Preview

Drone Strikes Argumentative Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
774 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Drone Strikes Argumentative Essay
Did you know in a five-month period between January 2012 and February 2013 there were multiple drone strike bombings? However, 90% of the people killed are not intentional targets. Yes, believe it or not, within a 5 month period only 10% of the targets are killed, while civilians and hopeless families had to suffer from the U.S. actions (Friedersdorf, Conor). While unmanned aircraft or drones are killing and traumatizing civilians, many believe these actions are copacetic as they make the United States impervious. Conversely, many believe these drone strikes are impeccable to prevent our complications, instead we truly are fabricating a more variety of dilemmas to the opposing countries and the United States. Presently, one of the argumentation for drones are its cause and effect, and one being how many civilians actually end up becoming terrorists after an attack (Drones-procon.org). Jeremy Scahill, an author, states, “ The vast majority of militants operating in Yemen today is "people who are aggrieved by attacks on their homes that forced them to go out and fight". As can be seen, our drone intrusions are destroying people's homes and families, that their hatred towards the U.S. is completely justifiable. Ordinarily speaking the United States are killing fewer terrorists than they are fabricating, and only producing motivation for multiple bombings as well as killings in response …show more content…
Are drones worth using for military comprehension? Because of the fact that the United States are actually killing innocent civilians and composing terrorists in order to kill low-value threats (Drones-procon.org) For the most components, the benefits of these drones are not really benefiting such as using the money saved for the same use and eventually being associated with a potential war involving drones. So the answer is no, drones are only causing more havoc than they are helping and should not be
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Drone Usage in War-Time Tactics
    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Drone Usage in War-Time Tactics

    Since the introduction of drones in war, the NY Times claims that the “CIA have not committed one civilian fatality, while allowing the troop death rate to decrease dramatically.” During the constant bettering of machinery throughout the world, the use of technology has come to a halt when it comes to an unmanned aerial vehicle. Slowly proving to be more reliable than the average pilot, in the years progressing new found respect has been shown by doubting militaries. In a HALE UAV article written by Carlos Reyes he states that “drones can fly up to 60,000 feet, being able to steadily winds at 15 mph compared to 50 mph winds at 40,000 feet.”(Reyes) and are able to outdo a pilot by almost 10,000 feet, due to the -75 degree weather. Portrayed by the US State Department as drones being useless, the use of drones has relentlessly grown to underestimated levels. A drone is classified as being “a UAV that is able to be controlled and sustain flight for numerous amounts of time, by a remote control”. The art of flying an attacking airplane remotely has made a strong peace appeal to not only the military but the citizens of the United States as well. By allowing the use of Drones in war time tactics, the innovation through this "technological leap" will help decrease in civilian deaths as well as increase in terrorist fatalities.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of CIA Drone Strikes
    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of CIA Drone Strikes

    CIA drone strikes have the potential to decimate terrorist organizations in an inexpensive manner and reduces boots on the ground combat for American soldiers. Though, we need expansive and additional congressional oversight of drone strikes and CIA targeting. The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) is devoted to regulating and reviewing every aspect of the drone program, however, committee members are often met with denial and restriction of information. We need to make sure our drone program is met with regulation and preemptive strikes must be strictly reviewed in a legal manner prior to, in order to prevent the endangerment of innocent civilians, radicalization and mobilization of extremest retaliation, and to preserve the reputation…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    I the Current Administration's Policy on Drone Strikes Constitutional
    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages

    I the Current Administration's Policy on Drone Strikes Constitutional

    On September 11, 2001, everything changed. Terrorism had never been seen on such a massive scale. As a result of the massive attacks on U.S. soil, changes had to be enacted. The fight against terror was now a global war effort. The War on Terror was not a popular choice, but it no one expected it to go on for this long. It is now being fought by technology, which led to the drones being used against U.S. citizens suspected of terrorism. The president can authorize these strikes with the claim that these citizens pose an imminent danger to the security of the United States. However, the Obama administration’s definition of imminent threat is vague and without oversight or any checks and balances. There are various military, governmental, and ethical concerns regarding the use of drone strikes ordered by the president. The use of drones is valid, but the administration has not presented any valid defense of their tactics, which paints a poor picture of Oval Office tactical policy.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Historical and Religious Significance of the Bombing of Civilians in World War Ii
    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Historical and Religious Significance of the Bombing of Civilians in World War Ii

    For as long as there has been war there have been soldiers, and as long as there have been soldiers there have been civilians. A civilian is defined as any person not in armed forces yet time and time again people have launched attacks against these neutral parties for both political and economic reasons. Although these attacks have taken many forms, one of the most severe and vicious ways this has been done is through aerial bombing. This tactic can be even more harmful than other forms of attack due to its very nature. While bombings kill as many civilians as other similar attacks, aerial bombing can destroy the buildings and infrastructure of a place as well, devastating the area for years, even after the bombing has stopped.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drone Warfare: A Rhetorical Analysis
    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Drone Warfare: A Rhetorical Analysis

    Drone Warfare, enacted by George Bush and expanded on by President Obama to provide a haven for Americans against the terrorist group, al-Qaeda. The use of weaponized unmanned surveillance drones allowed for far better independent targeting decisions, rather than retrieving intelligence from sources within the real country where the warfare would take place. These strategic implications created a question among Americans, is the use of drones to target individuals right? This question has arisen due to a high number of civilian casualties, making it seem inhumane to do. However, Kenneth Anderson provides readers a strong argument as to why drone warfare is strategically effective in his article, “The Case for Drones” with his organization pattern,…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    ABstract Glass Castle
    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    ABstract Glass Castle

    These armed attacks with drones have been the cause to killing major al-Qaeda leaders and dozens of lower-ranking operatives. Drones are the Obama administration’s weapon of choice and Obama has signed off on over 400 attacks in the last four years. President George W Bush, however, only oversaw less than 50 strikes during his term. US drones have killed about 3,300 al Qaeda, Taliban, and other operatives in Pakistan and Yemen. The drones allow for a pilot’s life to not be in danger at the battlefront or risked being shot down. A pilot can sit at his desk, safely, on US soil and control the drone just as he could flying it. “He can, for instance, choose a moment when his victim is isolated, or traveling in a car, reducing the chance of harming anyone else.” These pilots watch the target for days, weeks, even months to gain knowledge on the person and their routines. This…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Using Drones
    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Using Drones

    When we're using drones, we're putting a meaningless drone's life at risk rather than a soldier's. Drones are just helpful technology that have no psychology connections to the world. Meanwhile, soldiers are humans with bonds to friends and family. A soldier dying and losing his connection to the world would have much more of an impact than a technological tool. If a drone were to get shot while entering a country to spy, we would just find a new drone. But if a soldier were to do the same, there would be a massive impact to the people the soldier had interacted with. Meaning drones are irrelevant to the…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Michael Sandel Doing The Right Thing Analysis
    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Michael Sandel Doing The Right Thing Analysis

    Just because we have the technological power to use drones to take people/things out, that does not necessarily mean that we should. The main concern being brought up, that while we as a nation may have always killed people with a certain form of ease in the name of war, it has come at a high cost. It is expensive, and not too easy. However, with this drone system it is easier, less expensive, and does not require so much blood shed. This is an area of concern because this may become us as a nation to become much more relaxed when it comes to moral…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Drone War Is Still A War Summary
    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Drone War Is Still A War Summary

    Plaw states that one point in favor of drones is that they are weakening Al Qaeda, the taliban and affiliated groups. Also, they have a primary responsibility for protecting their own civilians. “Second, I doubt that ending drone strikes would substantially reduce anti-Americanism in the Islamic world or put a dent in radical recruitment.” However, that might be true, but they are still costing the lives of innocent civilians of those lives being women and children. Plaw says that to avoid these casualties drones can be sent out with a clearer justification of what it is going to do. He also explains that the drones are a lot less harmful to civilians then they are to Al Qaeda affiliates. The civilian casualties can be minimized therefore drones aren’t as dangerous as some…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Drone Killings
    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Drone Killings

    According to Kevin Zeese and Margaret Flowers, authors of “Anti-Drone Movement Grows: Ethics, Legality and Effectiveness of Drone Killings Doubted”, the use of drones by the U.S. military causes more trouble than what they are worth. Additionally, Zeese and Flowers reiterate their points by detailing attacks which “create situations in which violence begets violence”. However, as drones do collateral damage to objects around an established target, they are able to eliminate a large threat without endangering too many civilian and soldier lives. In fact, drones cause less damage to surrounding areas, use less resources, and are able to stay on for longer periods of times than soldiers. Hence this response paper challenges the viewpoints of Zeese…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drone Warfare Argumentative Analysis
    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Drone Warfare Argumentative Analysis

    On April 12, 2016, the Coalition for Peace Action co-sponsored the Ethical, Moral, and Faith Implications of Drone Warfare conference at New Brunswick Theological Seminary. Alongside of the leadership by Robin Suydam, the Peace Coalition partnered with local Reformed Church in America congregations in order to bring attention to our Interfaith Network on Drone Warfare campaign. This event was highlighted by drone victims accounts as well as excerpts from leading drone warfare documentaries. The evening closed with a riveting speech by former army chaplain, Chris Antal.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drone Home Analysis
    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drone Home Analysis

    Drones are capable of being used by terrorists and other criminals for their bad intentions. For example, in the article “Drone Home” on page 7, Lev Grossman points out the possible security concerns revolving the domestic use of drones.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Is Mary Shelley's Argument Of The Advancement Of Technology And Drone Warfare
    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Is Mary Shelley's Argument Of The Advancement Of Technology And Drone Warfare

    These machines destroy many enemy camps that contain the Al-Qaeda in places such as Somalia and Afghanistan. Drones also “have done so at little financial cost, at no risk to U.S. forces, and with fewer civilian casualties than many alternative methods would have caused.” (Byman). In the face of the riots all around the nation, Obama has called the reduction in America’s reliance to these machines even though they will still remain the government’s main weapon of choice for international warfare. These machines have done the task of killing the main leaders of the terrorist organization that has haunted us for many years and have denied the life of many of their sanctuaries. Knowing that this information was spread around the world, the citizens of America became more accepting of keeping the production of this new technology alive and to make it as strong as ever. Although it has not been the most approved program the military could use, the biggest advantage is that it actually works and it is the most efficient program for terminating enemy troops that the military has ever invested billions of dollars for. Many politicians and regular civilians “think it fair to say that the targeted killing program has been the most precise and effective application of firepower in the history of armed conflict.” (Hayden). From this quote, the reality of war has brought upon the competition of seeing which country’s military can create the strongest weapon possible. Since Al-Qaeda has started the War on Terrorism with America, Obama and the government have worked for many months on created these drones to help reduce the risk of terrorists towards the civilians. According to Michael Lewis, Drones used for war is actually the most humane forms of warfare that could…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drone Strikes In The United States
    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drone Strikes In The United States

    Since the attacks on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 and various other terrorist threats, the United States has used unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), or drones, to eliminate terrorists or potential terrorists. The US should continue using and developing drones as combat weapons because they have less collateral damage than impractical alternatives, keep our own troops safe, and aide military generals with photography and mapping of foreign countries. Moreover, because UAV's cannot guarantee the safety of the innocent bystanders, drones obtain the reputation of creating more terrorists than they tend to eliminate and not only do drone strikes violate the sovereignty in other countries, they also violate the rights of basic human rights. Consequently, drones may be perceived differently in the eyes of Americans and Pakistanis.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Persuasive Essay On Drones
    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Persuasive Essay On Drones

    Mankind used to be bound to the ground of Earth and it stood on the ground for a long time, but soon enough it found the ability to fly. The power of flight grants us new technologies to fill our needs. One of these new technologies gives us an extra pair of eyes and ears. These new creations are called drones. Drones solve many problems in the USA, but they also create some other problems as well. They can provide transportation of goods over the air and provide views from above for ground survey. However people complain that drones could invade people right to privacy. Having done extensive research on the subject of Drones, I believe that drones will do more good than harm. Even though many people fear that drones could threaten privacy in the US, but with proper regulations put into place, drones can…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics