Preview

Donald Trump's Competitive Advantage

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
747 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Donald Trump's Competitive Advantage
Over the course of the recent presidential election protecting American jobs from other countries has been a major issue and may have played an important part in Donald Trump’s victory. The president has stated he will impose massive tariffs on China and Mexico. I do not believe the United States should try to strong arm other nations to trade with our economic might by using tariffs and subsidies. When nations do try to influence trade with other nations the consumer usually pays the price. The producer may also have to pay more for materials if other nations reciprocate by implementing the same trade restrictions put on them. When countries try to protect their own industries companies may start depending on the government and put the burden …show more content…
The U.S. Federal government as assisted sugar producers for over one hundred years with the use of tariffs. Twenty-six years ago the congress passed the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 by which they assisted the agricultural industry. The bill was aimed at helping most of the agricultural sector. I will be discussing the impacts it has had on sugar producers in particular. The the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 has helps farmers by placing a tariff on sugar import after a certain weight has been imported into the country. In addition, the Department of Agriculture also provides loans to sugar producers to make sure the can profit. In a free market American sugar producers would not be able to stay in business due to other nations significantly lower production costs. The loan can be paid back with cash if market prices are higher or they can just give the sugar to the government which will pay off the loan regardless of world market prices (About Sugarcane). This has led to sugar producer to become dependent on government assistance which in turn has taken away the incentive for sugar producer to grow other crops. Another consequence is the American consumer has historically paid more for sugar the rest of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the period 1865-1900, technology, government policy, and economic conditions all changed American agriculture a great deal. New farming machinery had a large role in the late 19th century, giving farmers the opportunity to produce many more crops than they had ever been able to previously. The railroads had an enormous influence on agriculture. They were able to charge the farmers large fees, expenses that farmers barely had enough to cover, in order to transport their goods throughout the expansive country. The booming industry also changed American agriculture, creating monopolies and gaining incredible wealth with which the farmers simply could not compete. Economically, the monetary policy along with the steadily dropping prices of agricultural produce led farmers further into debt, eventually producing outcomes such as the crop-lien system and sharecropping. All of these tie into government policy, which, more often then not, favored the large and wealthy industries and monopolies over the farmers.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Corn production has gone up due to the help of ammonia fertilizer. Corn farms do not practice organic agriculture. Crop yield has gone up four times compared to Ian and Curt’s ancestors in the early 1900’s with the help of fertilizers and herbicides to kill the weeds. The government subsidizes large farms to plant on more land and to buy out their neighbors if they do not want to grow crops. Farmers get rewarded for overproduction of cheap corn which keeps the production of corn going on full blast. Majority of the corn produced gets fed to animals or us in the form of high fructose corn syrup which is empty calories. Due to consolidation of family farms into large farming operations, the consumers are harmed while the cooperation benefit because they get cheap corn produced in surplus to turn into high fructose corn syrup or feed to sell to livestock producers. Consumers are harmed because more high fructose corn syrup is being produced and put into the foods we consume on a daily basis. Corn is in everything that we consume, such as sodas and hamburgers. High fructose corn syrup has adverse effects such as a higher risk of acquiring type 2 diabetes and obesity. The table sugar consumption has decreased, but high fructose corn syrup consumption has increased by 30% because it is cheaper to buy and produce. In the late 1980’s high fructose corn syrup has taken over half of the sweetener…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Document A shows, over the course of the 35 years from 1865-1900, agriculture went from good to bad. Wheat went from $2.16 a bushel to $.62. Cotton and corn both followed in a similar suit, dropping from $.83 to $.10 a pound and $.52 to $.35 a bushel, respectively. As farmers began getting less and less profit from their produce, they tried to compensate more and more by producing more. Over time, this caused overproduction, driving prices down even more. The trend of overproduction is also demonstrated in Document C. However, as Mary Elizabeth Lease points out in Document G that even though they were producing more crops they were still cheated. The farmers were barely being paid for their crops and yet they were being told they were suffering from overproduction and when ten thousand children were starving every year in the United States. Poverty was affecting every citizen, whether they were white or black. This was demonstrated in Document E. This document shows how…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sugar Trade DBQ

    • 820 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The rise of absolute monarchies in Western Europe during the 1400’s brought a new economic theory called mercantilism. In mercantilism countries desired a favorable balance of trade, in which raw materials were imported from their own colonies, manufactured, and then exported. After the discovery of the Americas, cane sugar was introduced to the West Indies and became a prominent plantation cash crop. From that time sugar trade remained part of the global economy. In the era of 1492 to 1750 key factors such as favorable climate, demand for sugar, and profit from the slave trade, drove the sugar trade to flourish.…

    • 820 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The businesses of British manufacturers also declined because the taxes minimized the colonists’ purchasing power. The Sugar Act ruined the economy of Britain and the colonies. It significantly reduced foreign trade and distorted the stability of colonial currencies. Since money was not being exchanged, the currency value deflated. The decrease in value meant colonies had to spend more money to buy goods. This influenced the loss of island trade partners such as Haiti and the Canary Islands, causing a global economic recession (“The Sugar Act”). Not only did the instability of the colonial currencies affect foreign countries, it also had a negative impact on British sellers because the colonists had to pay more for their goods. In addition, buyers from outside Britain had no motivation to purchase their goods since the colonists were not trading with them. The Sugar Act ultimately hindered the financial recovery of…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sugar Trade Dbq

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The sugar trade was a successful time in England’s lands, and a new experience for the rest of the world. Cane sugar dominated the world just like tea and coffee, and so demands became high. Profits were made from the demands of the people, which brought the nation great wealth. Of course, none of this profiting could have been done without the help of slaves. The sugar trade was only successful through the will of the…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The immediate addiction European citizens developed to the new sweetener drove the sugar trade between Europe and the Caribbean. In order to feed this addiction, slave labor in the Caribbean emerged, taking advantage of the islands which proved to be perfect for the growth of Europe’s newest drug. The population of Europe strongly desired sugar for sweetening imports, especially coffee, tea and chocolate. The citizens craved the sweet taste and demanded to be supplied with more of the drug. The price of slaves, the driving force behind the production of sugar, reflected this love of the sweetener, as the demand for sugar rose so did the price of slaves. But, as the price of slaves rose so did the price of owning and maintaining a sugar plantation…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    You might ask, “What drove the sugar trade?”. Let me tell you by starting off saying; consumers demanded sugar. Consumers demanded sugar because the producers became wealthy off of sugar, sugar was sweet so people wanted it and was very efficient due to the labor of slaves.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In terms of the important history of sugar that effected people until currently by having a huge part in trading and being one of the reasons of slavery. Firstly, before many years the consuming of sugar was the highest between the other products, which was the reason of the dramatic Increase of trading. “Sugar was by far the most important of the overseas commodities that accounted for a third of Europe's entire economy”. ( Whipps, 2008). For example, Sugar trading began from Spain and Portugal and it has expanded to South America, and then it expanded whole world. (ShahThis, 2003)…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sugar Trade Essay

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As stated before, one of my thesis was that one things that drove the sugar trade was its…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Farm Subsidies

    • 2787 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The current Farm Bill is set to expire in 2012 and in this climate of spending reductions and budget balancing, there has been a lot of talk about reducing or eliminating many farm subsidies. The purpose of this paper and my research is to see what if any impact the elimination of the commodity subsidies would have on the local farming economy. The objectives of this paper are to examine the history of farm subsidies, the current Farm Bill, various commodity subsidy programs, criticisms of the current programs, and get a local perspective of the current effectiveness of the subsidy programs.…

    • 2787 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    food scarcity in haiti

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For instance, the expense for production of Haitian sugar was about three times higher than the global price during the 1980s. Changes within the sugar market which were mostly caused by the global replacement of corn-based fructose for sugarcane, put even more pressure and strain on Haitian producers. One consequence of this circumstance was the engagement of importing sugar, which was then re sent to the United States under the Haitian sugar quota. Unfortunately, the reductions within…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Donald Trump Benefits

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages

    President Trump intends to cut taxes on businesses and renegotiate trade deals (mainly NAFTA). This is no secret Trump has been preaching this since the beginning of his run for Presidency. Taking us out of NAFTA was a big point, but would that alone really have a risk? Robert E. Scott of the Economic Policy Institute states that roughly 300,000 manufacturing jobs have…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Agricultural Subsidy

    • 3026 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Agricultural subsidies and tariffs have been widely debated for several years and this is an issue that is not going away. There is no doubt that the subsidies and tariffs have benefits for some while simultaneously being detrimental to others. The chief area of concern is regarding the faceoff between developed nations, such as the United States and the European Union, and underdeveloped or growing nations, such as Brazil and African nations. What essentially is occurring is that a developed nation comes up with a price that they feel an agricultural product should be bought and sold at in the world market. Once they have this figure, if the going rate of the product dips below the number then the governments respond by giving subsidies to the farmers of their nation. These subsidies offset the dip in price and allow the developed nations farmers to still maintain their profit margin at no extra cost to them, while tariffs protect domestic farmers from cheaper, developing country export prices. If developed nations did not do this, farmers from their respective nations would not be able to compete with the far cheaper producers in developing nations. By doing so, richer nations are covering portions of the costs for the farmers allowing them to compete on the world market and in some cases dominate it. In developed nations if the subsidies were removed, it may in fact benefit the average consumer in those nations. They would be able to get their goods at a lower price while also not have to lose as much in taxes to pay for the subsidies. On the flip side, they might not have as much access to the products because in all likelihood the market for agricultural products would no longer appear feasible, thereby pushing producers out and depressing the supply.…

    • 3026 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kruijk, H. (1979). The effect of tariff and non-tariff barriers on U.S. sugar imports. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40438918…

    • 560 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays