Preview

Do Shareholders of Acquiring Firms Gain from Acquisitions?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
13122 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Do Shareholders of Acquiring Firms Gain from Acquisitions?
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES

DO SHAREHOLDERS OF ACQUIRING FIRMS GAIN FROM ACQUISITIONS? Sara B. Moeller Frederik P. Schlingemann René M. Stulz Working Paper 9523 http://www.nber.org/papers/w9523 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 February 2003

We are grateful to Harry DeAngelo and Ralph Walkling for useful comments. The views expressed herein are those of the author and not necessarily those of the National Bureau of Economic Research. ©2003 by Sara B. Moeller, Frederik P. Schlingemann, and René M. Stulz. All rights reserved. Short sections of text not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit including ©notice, is given to the source.

Do Shareholders of acquiring firms gain from acquisitions? Sara B. Moeller, Frederik P. Schlingemann, and René M. Stulz NBER Working Paper No. 9523 February 2003 JEL No. G31, G32, G34 ABSTRACT We examine a sample of 12,023 acquisitions by public firms from 1980 to 2001. Shareholders of these firms lost a total of $218 billion when acquisitions were announced. Though shareholders lose throughout our sample period, losses associated with acquisition announcements after 1997 are dramatic. Small firms gain from acquisitions, so that shareholders of small firms gained $8 billion when acquisitions were announced and shareholders of large firms lost $226 billion. We examine the cross-sectional variation in the announcement returns of acquisitions. Small firm shareholders earn systematically more when acquisitions are announced. This size effect is typically more important than how an acquisition is financed and than the organizational form of the assets acquired. The only acquisitions that have positive aggregate gains are acquisitions of subsidiaries.

Sara B. Moeller Department of Finance Cox School of Business Southern Methodist University smoeller@mail.cox.smu.edu René M. Stulz Fisher College of Business Ohio State University



References: 26 Wruck, K.H., 1989, Equity ownership concentration and firm value: Evidence from private equity financings, Journal of Financial Economics 23, 3-28

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    finance manamgement

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hostile acquisitions create real animosities between the stockholders of the acquired and acquiring companies. Comment on the truth of this statement.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    M&a Exam Review

    • 2985 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Why do you think shareholders from target companies enjoy an average gain when acquired, while acquiring shareholders on average…

    • 2985 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Eagles Electronics Case

    • 3249 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Cremers, N. & Kose, J.2009, Takeovers and cross-section of returns: Review of financial studies, 22, pp. 1409-1445…

    • 3249 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    References: Do Acquiring Firms Knowingly Pay Too Much for Target Firms? Evidence from Earnings Management in Member-Firm Mergers in Korean Business Groups Jae Wook Jeong* and Gil S. Bae** This version, January 2011…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hello World

    • 18274 Words
    • 74 Pages

    Abstract Acquirers and targets allocate interim risk in merger agreements through Material Adverse Change (MAC) clauses and exclusions. While virtually all acquisitions have MAC clauses, there is broad cross-sectional variation in the number and type of MAC exclusions. Using comprehensive hand-collected data, we find that acquisitions with fewer firm-specific MAC exclusions, i.e., stronger abandonment options for the acquirers, are associated with higher acquirer announcement returns, higher combined surplus gains, higher target announcement returns, and better prior target performance. Fewer firm-specific MAC exclusions appear to be credible signals of higher target quality and are more prevalent when information asymmetries are likely high and signaling is particularly beneficial. In contrast, more market-wide MAC exclusions are not associated with higher acquirer or target gains although acquirers tend to assume the largely exogenous, market-wide interim risk when the expected completion periods are longer.…

    • 18274 Words
    • 74 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Edward Jones Case

    • 4171 Words
    • 17 Pages

    P. C. Haspeslagh & Jemison, D. B. “Acquisitions – Myths and reality”, Sloan Management Review, Winter 1987, pp. 53-58.…

    • 4171 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Danaher Case Study

    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages

    • Despite the claim that acquisitions destroy value certain companies excel as acquirers and deliver outstanding value for shareholders. • We studied the relationship between long term total shareholder returns (TSR) and different acquisition strategies and a variety of deal characteristics. – The only trait that consistently has a strong positive relationship with long term TSR across each industry is acquisition frequency. • We call them Serial Acquirers and many generate outstanding results by being better at planning, executing and integrating acquisitions than their peers.…

    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Forthcoming in Journal of Economic Perspectives. For their helpful comments we thank, without implicating, Menzie Chinn, Richard Clarida, Bradford DeLong, Charles Engel, James Hines, James Lothian, Bennett McCallum, Michael Melvin, Peter Neary, Maurice Obstfeld, Lawrence Officer, David Papell, David Peel, Phillip Lane, Kenneth Rogoff, Andrew Rose, Lucio Sarno, Timothy Taylor, Eric van Wincoop and Michael Waldman. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the National Bureau of Economic Research. ©2004 by Alan M. Taylor and Mark P. Taylor. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source.…

    • 12965 Words
    • 52 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research…

    • 15011 Words
    • 61 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    8. Lichtenberg, F. and Siegel, D. (1990). The effects of leveraged buyouts on productivity and related aspects of firm behaviour. Journal of Financial Economics. 9. Lubatkin, M. and Chatterjee, S. (1994). Extending modern portfolio theory into the domain of corporate diversification: Does it apply?. Academy of Management Journal, 37, pp. 109-136. 10. Pinegar, M. and Wilbricht, L. (1989). What Managers Think of Capital Structure Theory: A Survey. Financial Management, Winter, pp. 82-91. 11. Smith, A. (1990). Corporate ownership structure and performance. The case of Management Buyouts. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, pp.143-164. 12. McConnell, J. and Muscarella, C. (1985). Corporate capital expenditure decisions and the market value of firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 14, pp. 399-422. 13. Modigliani, F. and Miller, M. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance, and the theory of investment. American economic Review 48, June, 261-197. 14. Dividend Smoothing, Agency Costs, and Information Asymmetry: Lessons from the Dividend Policies of Private Firms. 15. Michael S. Rozeff , Growth, Beta and Agency Costs as Determinants of Dividend Payout Ratios, Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 249-259, Fall 1982. 16. Smith, A. (1990). Corporate ownership structure and performance. The case of Management Buyouts. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, pp.143-164. 17. Henri Servaes Tobin’s Q and the gain from takeovers: The Journal of Finance • Vol. LXVI, No. 1 • March 1991. 18. Easterbrook (1984): Two Agency-Cost Explanations of Dividends. 19. The Modern Corporation and Private Property, Berle and Means. 20. Brealey & Myers on Corporate Finance: Capital Investment and Valuation , Richard A Brealey, Stewart C Myers. 21. The Black (1976) effect and cross market arbitrage in FTSE-100 index futures and options.…

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mergers

    • 3420 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Fundamentals of Financial Management, 12e Chapter 23: Mergers and Other Forms of Corporate Restructuring After studying Chapter 23, you should be able to: Chapter 23 Explain why a company might decide to engage in corporate restructuring. Understand and calculate the impact on earnings and on market value of companies involved in mergers. Describe what benefits, if any, accrue to acquiring company shareholders and to selling company shareholders. Analyze a proposed merger as a capital budgeting problem.…

    • 3420 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Advanced Accounting

    • 5301 Words
    • 22 Pages

    1. Accounting standard-setting environments 2. Financial instruments and income tax allocation 3. Introduction to intercorporate investments 4. Consolidation subsequent to acquisition 5.…

    • 5301 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Table of Contents Page Table of Contents Abstract Declaration Acknowledgment List of Tables List of Illustrations ii vi vii viii x xiv…

    • 7769 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Scenerios of Brm

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Companies are much interested in acquiring other firms even when the latter operate in totally unrelated realms of business. For example, GenCorp Industries manufacturing asphalt plants for road construction acquired Ingersoll-Rand in 1996, and later acquired yet another company engaged in the business of food processing. Such acquisitions are claimed to "work miracles". However, given the volatility of the stock market and the slowing down of business, many companies are not sure whether such acquisitions are becoming too risky. At the same time, they also wonder if they are missing out on a great business opportunity if they fail to engage in this activity. Some research is needed here!…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scholar Paper

    • 14272 Words
    • 58 Pages

    First and foremost, I am dearly indebted to my supervisor Prof Madya Dr. M Fazilah…

    • 14272 Words
    • 58 Pages
    Good Essays