Preview

Discuss Some Ways Of Knowing More Likely Than Others To Lead To Truth

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
934 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Discuss Some Ways Of Knowing More Likely Than Others To Lead To Truth
In this essay I will discuss whether some ways of knowing are more like than others to lead to the truth. There is no single definition of the truth where every philosopher agrees with. What we can say is that the truth is one of the most important elements in our society which extends from “honesty, good faith and sincerity in general to agreement with fact or reality in particular”. Instead of just concentrating on the four ways of knowing, language, perception, reason and emotion, I will also look at the areas of knowledge, such as sciences and mathematics to help finding which of the four ways of knowing is the most likely to lead to the truth.

To answer the research question, we first have to look at the truth itself. In a dictionary is said that truth is “The degree to which a statement corresponds with reality and logic ”.Every human being defines truth in a different way. Truth can be what one is prepared to accept as truth, as well as something which is proved by a study for being true or what for example the media, books, government and yourself name to be true.
…show more content…
A good example is Isaac Newton’s theory of mechanics and universal gravitation. In this time everyone believed his theory describing the universe as being “true” and there was no evidence for it being not the truth. Than after some centuries some scientist discovered things where Newton’s theory didn’t account for. Therefore his theory was than called “untrue” and Albert Einstein’s evidence which fitted more into these discoveries was named as being true. This is evidence therefore, that science is a process, the truth will always change in time, but in this particular time period the truth cannot be named as “untrue” because it cannot be disproved by knowledge or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Knowledge is generally thought to require justified true belief, even if justified true belief is not sufficient for knowledge, as Edmund Gettier famously argued. In the Meno, Plato demonstrates that true opinion is not equal to knowledge. However, Gettier holds a different opinion that justified opinion is not equal to knowledge, but it is necessary to knowledge. I support the Plato’s opinion that true opinion is not equal to knowledge, and that justified opinion is not necessary to having knowledge of something.…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With this lesson, we begin a new unit on epistemology, which is the philosophical study of knowledge claims. In this first lesson on epistemology, Dew and Foreman discuss some of the basic issues raised in the study of epistemology and then discuss the nature of knowledge itself. They consider questions such as, “What do we mean when we say we know something?” “What exactly is knowledge?…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Truth is one of the main debated topic in philosophy. Many have different ideals on what is to be true , or on how to find their sense of truth. In, actuality one may not get a grounded definition of the truth but it relates to the correspondence between the idea of what something is in their head, to what they believe the idea refers to. Both characters in Shakespeare's Hamlet , Hamlet and Polonius , exercises their conflicts with deception in order of seeking the truth. Similarly, philosophers Descartes and Hume shares their distinctive principles of the truth systematically. Which their idea’s is in correspondence to the characters behaviors and attitudes in…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The difference between truth and knowledge itself moreover is a much simpler matter. Since the only semantic distinction between the two is that, truth is anything that is in accord with fact or reality whereas knowledge are any facts, information, and skills acquired through experience or education. However from an epistemological perspective disagreement still remain about whether our senses can be trusted to discover the ultimate nature of reality and subsequently establish if the perceived world as we know it is not just an illusion or a dream.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most scientific knowledge is durable, even though scientists reject the thought of they are accomplishing absolute truth. but when there are new information through new technology the knowledge might change. They rather modified ideas than reject them. For example, in formulating the theory of relativity, Albert Einstein did not renounce the laws of Newton of motion but showed them to be only an idea of limited use within a more general concept.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Knowledge is information that is understood to a point that it can be used as a skill to help oneself in certain situations. The reason that it is so highly valued is because it can be difficult to obtain. There is so much information in the world that not all knowledge can be known and acquired to benefit those who hold it. How does one learn knowledge? The topic I chose states that there are only two ways in which humankind can produce knowledge: through passive observation or through active experiment.” In this essay I will explain the extent to which I believe this statement is true. All human beings develop knowledge of a subject through observation of what is taking place, or experiencing the knowledge on a first hand level.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    For thousands of years, mankind has persistently pursued truth, knowledge, and understanding. For most, this pursuit is a driving force which usually doesn't end until one finds a "truth" that is satisfying to him or her. Even then, however, one may choose to look for an alternate truth that may be even more satisfying to them. This pursuit does not always follow the same path for everyone as there are different ideas as to how truth is actually obtained and which is the best way to obtain it. Two individuals and great philosophers of their time, Plato and Charles Peirce, each had their own ideas on how truth and knowledge could be obtained.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato and Aristotle view knowledge and the process whereby it is obtained. They both point out that many epistemological concepts which they believe where knowledge comes from and what it is actually. Most of them have been astonished me in certain ways, but I found that rationalism and "wisdom consists in knowing the cause which made a material thing to be what it is" make the most sense to me regarding the nature of knowledge. As the following, we will discuss about why these two philosophical viewpoints are superior and the others are inferior.…

    • 1414 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Traditional analysis of knowledge says to know that P. the following requirements must be satisfied: (1) You believe that P, (2) You have justification for P and (3) that P is true. This definition of knowledge was thought to have satisfied many philosophers for centuries after Plato, this was until philosopher Edmund Gettier wrote ‘Is justified true belief knowledge?’. In this short paper he argues that justification and truth is necessary for knowledge but not sufficient thus concluding that we need something more. Although Gettier hasn’t written anything since, there have been a number of responses that attempt to either prove the jtb theory as right, or to add or take away from the Jtb theory in order to make it a valid argument. Throughout this essay I will discuss the responses that Gettier has…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What does truth mean?

    • 929 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What does truth mean? Truth can mean many different things, to different people. I believe, that truth is what people accept as being correct when it can not be proven factually. "It is a relationship that holds that holds between a proposition and the corresponding fact"(Truth[Inernet Encyclopedia of Philosophy]). "According to, The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, truth is conformity to knowledge, fact, actuality, or logic." There are three major competing theories of truth. The three theories are pragmatic, correspondence, and coherence. The remainder of this paper will discuss all three of these theories, plus which theory seems to be the most defensible to me, and why.…

    • 929 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To start with, the scientific method can allow us to uncover truth. It is needed to say that it allow us to uncover provisional truth. Truth can be provisional because we accept it may change over time, as new discoveries are made and the supposedly “truth” is no longer but it’s replaced by another and new “truth”. We accept one statement as true or not according to its degree of objectivity. Scientific method recollects empirical evidence, which is measurable and comparable and allows for the application of consistency tests. The application of consistency tests reduces the impact of subjectivity and the limitations of sense perception in the recollection of evidence. This allows us to construct explanations that are objective enough for society to define these explanations as provisional truth.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Consider Darwin’s Origin of Species. We cannot observe animals evolve over time, because the human lifespan is relatively short compared to Earth. We can take what we discover through fossils and genetics to try and make sense of these changes. Darwin developed a reasonable interpretation from his research, but there is always going to be research that will revise his findings, because we never know if the next…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Study Guide: Truth

    • 414 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Distinguish the character and limitations of truth as derived by revelation and by the scientific method.…

    • 414 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    What is Truth

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages

    For thousands of years the pursuit of knowledge and the definition of fact plagued philosophers. In order to define what knowledge truly is, fact must be defined as well. If something is a fact, then that must mean that it is truth. Facts and knowledge coexist with truth due to facts being true and incorrect statements being false. Ergo, knowledge can be seen as truth. Then the counterpart of truth; error is one of the main problems of the knowledge of truth (The Problems of Philosophy, 12). However a question that is frequently pondered is “What is truth really?” In order to answer this obscure question philosophers have fabricated many theories. The most famous of these theories are the correspondence and coherence theory. Other theories of truth use said theories as a foundation that later branch off into different directions (Encyclopaedia Britannica). I will examine the strengths and weaknesses of both correspondence and coherence theory while finally using the flaws and benefits of both theories to state my position on how truth is strictly subjective.…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes vs Locke

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages

    René Descartes and John Locke, both seventeenth century philosophers, are often seen as two of the first early modern philosophers. Both Descartes and Locke attempt to find answers to the same questions in metaphysics and epistemology; among these: What is knowledge? Is there certainty in knowledge? What roles do the mind and body play in the acquisition of knowledge? Descartes and Locke do not provide the same answers to these questions. In this paper the similarities and differences between the philosophies of Descartes and Locke will be addressed.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays