Moreover, smokers also have their own protection law. In the United States Smoker Protection Laws are state statutes that prevent employers from discriminating against employees for using tobacco products. So this shows that there are not many discrimination against smokers. Although employers can keep their workplace, smoke free, they can’t stop their workers form smoking during their free time.
Illegal racial and gender discrimination however was a serious issue back then. People was more open to make discrimination against race and gender. It is also important to keep in mind that there was no any law amended to protect equal racial and gender rights at that time. Society wasn’t really into accepting people from other races or gender holding higher position or post in work place. So they were very open in discriminating. Since their victim of discrimination are minorities, there is nothing can be done. Compared to smokers. They are in majority numbers, so their chances of getting discriminated are lower, compared to racial and gender discrimination victims. This is because, society always attacks the minority or weaker race or gender.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Smoking has become a debatable topic in recent years, with everyone having his or her own opinion of the issue. There is a sudden push to get everyone to stop smoking. In her essay "I 'd Rather Smoke than Kiss" Florence King takes on the anti-smokers and the way they are treating smokers today.…
- 727 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Let me briefly explain a bit farther my thoughts concerning this subject. Smoking is not inherently wrong, one has the right to smoke but when that right to smoke can adversely affect another especially their health then it should be controlled. Understandable, employees that work in a bar inherently take on reasonable risks in the performance of their duties, but should they be needlessly subjected to cancer causing agents like tobacco and second hand smoke? I say…
- 1790 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
Billingsley has the power to encourage change and write new policies to be effective immediately without any hesitation. While the employee’s are discouraged, they need to acknowledge that they do work for the health department and smoking is considered dangerous to the public. According to the Columbia Encyclopedia “smoking is considered a health hazard because tobacco smoke contains nicotine, a poisonous alkaloid, and other harmful substances such as carbon monoxide, acroleing, ammonia, prussic acid, and a number of aldehydes and tars. (Capella) So the health effects are smoking are really dangerous so smoking on state property should be eliminated immediately as you are representing a healthy lifestyle to the…
- 1275 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The literary story “The Smoker” is told in third person through the Doughlas Kerchek, a teacher of high school English. He teaches English at St Agnes High School which is an all girl private school. In this story it goes into detail about the character, Douglas, how he has a PH.D in English that he got from Harvard and how he lives this simple life alone. A solitary well –boxer- built man, good –looking early 30’s, he is a figure of interest among the young women and his collegues. The title refers to the recurring event of the Friday Night Smokers hosted by the Society of gentlemens club in Kerchek hometown in which Mr Kerchek went to often. He lived this simple life where he had a routine he did, and he did this day by day week by week.…
- 497 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Smoking cigarettes can cause lung problems. Both first-hand and second-hand smokers are affected by cigarette smoke. Scientific findings and researches show that the chemicals in cigarettes, apart from the smoke, can lead to health problems such as lung cancer. Smoking cigarettes should be banned in public places. In public places, more people, both young and old, can be exposed to the smoke from cigarettes. My position differs from those who might say that smoking altogether should not be banned. My position is that smoking in public places should be banned. It does not include smoking in private places like homes. Smoking in public places should be banned because it poses health risks to individuals who are non-smokers and who do not want to inhale the fumes from cigarettes. The risks are double to those who already have lung ailments.…
- 577 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
A) No, people have the rights to choose whether they are going to smoke Cigarettes…
- 855 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
By companies banning their employees from smoking can infringe on the employee’s right to of privacy. This right…
- 747 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
I've got to give it to you for getting your ideas together and for coming up with a very compelling writing essay. The points you brought out are quite strong and persuasive enough to be considered as main factors in banning smoking in the workplace.…
- 57 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The health effects of smoking in the workplace are well-known and recent studies have proven not only first hand smoking to be dangerous, but passive or second hand smoke to be just as, if not more dangerous. This is why I believe smoking should be banned both inside and outside of the workplace.…
- 273 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
One interviewee described smoking at her desk at work with other coworkers who smoked, which is no longer allowed, and described smoking much more often in this situation than she could now with the new restrictions. The candidate also described feeling judged when smoking in public, and would refuse to smoke in the places she felt people would “turn up their noses” at her (Poland). Another interviewee stated that while the new restrictions encouraged people to cut down on their cigarette intake or quit smoking altogether that she believed that smokers would just hide their addictions better. Closet smokers would become the new norm as the stigma around smoking would become larger and larger, making smokers “hide out with the rest of the lepers”…
- 797 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In the banning of smoking breaks article, employers are becoming increasingly aware of the severe health issues related to smoking and the impact of smoking on job performance, absenteeism, and the rising cost of insurance health care benefits. It is not uncommon to see an employer refuse to offer a job to a candidate that admits to smoking. Those employees whom smoke are given the opportunity to seek nicotine replacement therapy for quitting and this is routinely covered by most health insurance. There are also numerous public health organizations assisting with smoking cessation.…
- 656 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Going back to the 1700's when America was in the process of becoming America, smoking has always been present. Now in present day America, walking down the streets of any town, or road, you see and smell the awful and thick smell of tobacco smoke. 9 out of 10 times you are guaranteed to find an old cigarette on the ground. Attempts to better this issue have been made of course. Gruesome commercials tell the terrible consequences of smoking on the body, taxes have been raised on them, but people continue to smoke. But there still are the good citizens of this country who do not have this awful habit and are free from those horrific consequences of smoking right? Although considering the problem of second-hand smoking many of those "non-smokers" are still affected. I think it is agreed by society as a whole that this problem must be fixed at once. Here I will provide two intelligent solutions to this problem that I have come up with being only a innocent bystander.…
- 621 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Are smoking bans against smoking in public places really that necessary to protect non-smokers from the harmful chemicals of second hand smoke? The answer from a smoker is: Yes! However, another question that should be asked is: Do smoking bans infringe upon the rights of your freedom to smoke if you choose to smoke in places other than your personal residence or automobile? The answer from a smoker is: Yes! Therefore, the real question that must be asked is: Are smoking bans becoming too restrictive? Comment by SVSU: Quite a few questions here. Why not simply state these things?…
- 941 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Since people smoke everyday they bring their nasty habit to work you can smell it on their clothes and when you walk outside for a break. Every workplace is entitled to have a smoke free workplace for their employees. This rule is existence with state and local governments. Some benefits to keep the workplace smoke free would be they would not be exposed to it at work. Smokers that are willing have a better chance at trying to quit will have an easy chance by not breathing it and wanting a cigarette each time. The employer may have the healthcare costs reduced which shows that the company cares. The employee may less likely to miss work because of smoke related illnesses. The office equipment will last longer such as the carpet and furniture. Here is a brief policy for companies to go by to make sure their workplace is smoke free. No smoking of tobacco products of any kind. The manager has the final say on the designated smoking area outside of the building. This designated area will remain 20 feet form the entrance. All materials used including cigarette butts and…
- 974 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the article “Banning the Smoking Gun” written April 16, 2013 for the Sentential Carl DeBeer claims that smoking on campus should not be banned. His reasons for opposing the ban were: 1) it infringes on the smoker’s rights. 2) Secondhand smoke can cause harm, but it is the individuals choice to stand close to the individual smoking. The evidence he states is that one if you ban smoking people will smoke less. That is not true according to economist at the St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank they found that smoking bans do not have any significant effect on the number of smokers (according to David Nicklaus at St. Louis Today). Also shown in a study from Stanford University, that being with in eighteen inches of someone who is smoking two cigarettes in over an hour is just a bad as being in a bar filled with smoke for an hour and it is still that individual’s choice to stand there. He also in an article from the New York Times written by Michael Seiger stating that by limiting smoking section to many smokers would be forced to stand outside in front of the establishment putting the people walking in in danger of secondhand smoke. He used logos to convince me with his evidence. He does not state an opposing view in which hurts his argument in my opinion because there is no compromise between the two views. It is quite interesting to me because I walk past the smoking sections every time I go to class, also I got the surveys that were sent out and I answered once an ignored the rest. I want to find out more because I have no problem with the smoking and I would to know others views. I think that this a strong one sided argument if the opposing views where included I think that it would be…
- 322 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays