Although it may be referred to by other names (direct exposition, objective narration, summary exposition, or simply narration), direct narration is where the narrator of the story addresses the reader directly. When conveying information by direct narration, the narrator simply states the information without any pretext of channeling it through a character or exposing it through some sort of prop.
As noted by Ansen Dibell in Plot, the simplest way is to just slip the information between scenes as the all-seeing, all-knowing (but impersonal and invisible) narrator.
But, warns Dibell, there's a price for direct narration: "Authorial intrusions-the story stopping dead while the author rambles on about whatever happens to interest him-used to be common-place, a hundred and a half years ago." For example, Melville's cetology chapters telling the folklore, anatomy, and habits of whales. "Now, though," notes Dibell, "they're much disliked."
Example of exposition through direct narration:
Meanwhile, in a saloon across the street from Cisco, Black Bart slipped a derringer into his coat pocket.
THROUGH CHARACTERS
"The other choice," according to Ansen Dibell, "is to have your characters give the necessary facts . . . ."
As stated by Jordan E. Rosenfeld, "Dialogue is a wonderfully versatile technique for giving the reader information necessary to drive the plot forward or deepen character understanding . . . ."
But Dibell cautions "Don't ever put into a character's mouth anything that's strictly and obviously for the reader's consumption. Readers aren't fooled, and you've turned your characters into unconvincing puppets, dummies making silly speeches at each other."
Another way for characters to provide exposition is through thoughts, especially recollection. According to Dibell ". . . you can have the exposition as one character's reflections or thoughts-the fiction writer's version of a soliloquy. Your character can think about something . . . and thereby let the reader know what you want to convey."
Example of exposition through dialogue:
Gabby grabbed Cisco's shoulder. "Be careful, sonny. I've heard that Black Bart carries a derringer
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
2. Create a personal diary or journal for that character, which describes the major events happening in the story—both "seen" and "unseen" in the play itself. You are writing as if you are that character, from their viewpoint and perspective, in the first person narrative form.…
- 459 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
|Narration |The art of storyteller and the |The order in which tell the story from |Keep the human sense in mind |…
- 653 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Ray Bradbury uses dialogue to draw out a conversation between the characters in the story. For example “George I wish you’d look at the nursery.”’ What's Wrong with it?”” I don’t know” ( Bradbury 1). This craft move is great it does not only make the story longer it also makes the reader like me think what are they talking about because it was at the beginning…
- 409 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Stephan King once said, “Writing good dialogue is art as well as craft” This means dialogue will help you visualize things, like scenery or people. What also helps visualize things is the word choice used. In the story The Pigman by Paul Zindel, the author uses word choice and dialogue to develop visual situations. In the story The Pigman by Paul Zindel, the author uses word choice and dialogue to develop visual situations.…
- 628 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The characterization method that is present in the poem “Bleeder” by Stephen Dobyns is direct because of the following reasons. My main reason I think the direct method is used because the narrator describes all the things he wants to do to the boy that bleeds. He says he wanted to make a cut into him and wanted to see how much he would bleed. Then the other campers were also like the narrator because at one point he said “We each know how much the other would like to see him bleed.” Finally there's the “man on the hill” which I think is the person in charge. You could tell he doesn’t care because he doesn’t interfere until a near death situation occurs. We know now that the narrator was weird because he stalked the boy but also had dreams…
- 176 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
This technique is evident in the novel when Gemma tells her life story to her grandchildren through the fairytale of Briar Rose. Again when Josef recounts his life through the war and when Gemma appeared in his life, telling her story. There is an alternate story that holds the audiences attention because they have more than one topic to focus on or think about e.g. within the fairy tale the prince says “But do you know courage?…And saying so he put his right hand into the thorns.” When Josef is portrayed as the prince we find out he also did something similar “Josef practically strolled up to the fence and, heedless of cuts to his hands & feet, flung himself up and over the wire.” The audience is now made aware of the events that will occur through the fairytale before they do in real life however some events will only barely touch on the fairytale expectation. For example the prince that saved Briar Rose is not your typical prince in real life, Josef is homosexual and therefore his intentions with Gemma are merely to save her…
- 900 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
As you all know, even a visual tells a story. However, characters in a text through distinctive voices demonstrate their personalities which contribute to an insightful understanding of the text.…
- 683 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
An excellent example of where dictation contributed to the plot would be when Mrs. Peters says, “My, it’s a good thing the men couldn’t hear us. Wouldn’t they just laugh! Getting all stirred up over a little thing like a-dead canary. As if that could have anything to do with-with-wouldn’t they laugh!” Although Mrs. Peters doesn’t come out and say it directly through the diction the reader is able to make a couple very important assumptions about the plot, for example, it is obvious that Mrs. Peters is nervous, because she won’t come out and say what she is thinking, this shows that she may have suspicions as to how Mr. Wright died. Also, aside from sounding nervous Mrs. Peters also seems to be doubting herself, this is important to the plot because the reader can make assumptions that Mrs. Peters knows exactly what has happened, but won’t say it because then it will become very real that Mrs. Wright murdered her husband. Not only does diction contribute to characterization but, it contributes to plot as well, involving the readers’ more into the story and keeping them on edge to know how the story will…
- 2105 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
“Oh, I have eyes… but no ears to speak of, just bits of dangling flesh. But that’s fine, like Dr Abrams says… He was joking, of course.” Conversational style of address Creates a close bond between the reader and the narrator…
- 5507 Words
- 23 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Exposition is a the revealing of the information of the story (Delbanco & Cheuse). Things like information on the characters, setting, and history are given so that the reader's…
- 1116 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Film, as a form of popular art, contributes greatly to various societies since its emergence for such a medium embodies the set of values and beliefs of the culture for which and within which it is made. Fritz Lang’s M (1931), which was produced during the Weimar Republic period, is an example of this role of motion pictures. In the following paragraphs, this essay will analyze the way the movie features the instability and insanity of the political and social situation through the examination of its narration and mise-en-scene. Narration, as defined in Film Art: An Introduction, is “the process through which the plot conveys or withholds story information” (Bordwell and Thompson 503). In this particular production, Fritz Lang used narration…
- 1218 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
(I don’t mean to bring politics into this paper, however, it’s good for this example. IF YOU WISH TO SKIP THIS PART LOOK FOR THE *) Take for example our president. Before President Trump was elected we witnessed his character on live television. Let’s just say that his character was not up to par, making sexual remarks to women, being racist, and just down right unpleasant to be around. These were extremely highlighted in is actions as a person! He was extremely rude to people, unwanted groping of women, and the list just goes on. *Another example would be theater. In theater the challenge actors have is to show a character in action, and have their actions reveal to the audience what kind of person they are, what is important to them, what they want, and what they love and hate. People don’t just go around saying what their exact character is to one another. People look closely at others actions to make a theory about what another person’s character is. Likewise, authors have to allow their characters show us what their character is through their actions and behavior, rather than tell us who they are through a narrative point of…
- 760 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
This method of narration sometimes entails the novelist to directly address the readers. This is known as Authorial Intrusion. In Ch.61 Jane Austen directly 'intrudes' into the action remarking "I wish I could say."…
- 1516 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Are the characters described directly by the narrator or indirectly through action and what they say?…
- 575 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
A soliloquy (from Latin: "talking by oneself") is a device often used in drama whereby a character speaks to himself, relating his thoughts and feelings, thereby also sharing them with the audience. Other characters however are not aware of what is being said.[1][2] A soliloquy is distinct from a monologue or an aside: a monologue is a speech, in which one character addresses other characters, whereas an aside is a (usually short) comment by one character towards the audience.…
- 383 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays