Differential Association Theory In College

Differential association theory argues that we learn deviant behavior in precisely the same manner we learn about conventional behaviors: from our primary contact groups such as our peers, family, and coworkers. This theory states that we become more deviant; which is nonconformity to a given set of norms in a community or society, when exposed to higher levels of deviant persons and influences. I believe this theory best explains underage drinking on college campuses. This is because individuals exposed to social environments that encourage illegal activities tend to partake in them. Underage drinking can be viewed as the norm, especially within the college culture, because it is so widely accepted between different groups in terms of ethnicity and gender. I believe that many college students choose to partake in this due to the fact that their “social circle” and peers engage in it.
Travis Hirschi claims that there are four types of bonds that link people to society and decent behavior. These include attachment and commitment. I believe this theory is much like differential association theory because they both have factors that contain peer pressure. Though, control theory helps maintain social control and conformity by rendering people unfree to break rules, when differential theory claims that we learn deviant behavior through interaction with others. They both however, share the fact that delinquency and deviance may result if these bonds are broken within society. I believe this theory has a little to do with college drinking because due to the involvement bond, students will use this time by participating in conventional activities, taking away time from deviant act or