Preview

Differential Association Theory And Labelling Theory

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
136 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Differential Association Theory And Labelling Theory
As you stated, both differential association theory and labelling theory help to comprehend the reasons behind people’s engagement in deviant behaviours. However, many sociologist criticized them. According to some critics, differential association theory neglects the possible relationship between crime and social inequality. They also highlight the fact that it lacks evidence and proofs that the interaction with those who violate the rules leads people to adapt similar criminal behaviours. In addition, critics argue that labelling theory fails to provide the main reasons behind primary crimes. It also does not consider people who successfully resist the imposition of a specific label and it only focuses on those who accept those labels. In

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Some say labelling is not a ‘theory’ because it does not give an explanation of law, but questions why we have such rules. For Labelling theorists there is no such thing as crime, as we create the laws and punishments by defining certain acts to be deviant. Deviant means to depart from usual or accepted standards. Leading theorist Kitsuse said “it is the responses of the conventional and conforming members of society which identify and interpret behaviour as deviant which sociology transforms persons into deviants”. This means that it is not the actions themselves that are crimes…

    • 4485 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In support of this theory, Edwin Sutherland, a criminologist in 1939 introduced differential association theory of deviance – in which he identified 3 factors, which determine deviance.…

    • 6242 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This paper explores how Differential Association Theory, Techniques of Neutralization and the Hirschi’s Social Bonding Theory explain deviance in the crimes of larceny and murder. These theories have intertwining perspectives on why individuals partake in criminal behaviors such as theft and homicide. The Differential Association Theory acknowledges that criminal behavior is learned and not hereditary, Techniques of Neutralization expands on the idea that individuals lack responsibility for their actions and Hirschi’s Social Bonding Theory states four components influence the social bond: attachment, commitment, involvement and moral beliefs.…

    • 87 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Differential Association was designed by Ewin Sutherland and his theory can mostly be demonstrated through interaction with others, individuals learn the values, attitudes, techniques, and motives for criminal behavior. Ewin Sutherland also states that individual conducts when regarding differential association, people learn the same in criminal behavior as they do in other types of actions as can be non-criminal attitudes as well. Differential association is a leaned behavior that develops over time and one’s surroundings. Environment surroundings have a major influence in your daily life and who is in it. Learning theories stand in contrast to theories which argue that social class, broken homes, race, age among other valuables lead to crime.…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This theory also explains how labeling these indivudal and them becoming an outcast can affect the behaviors. This theory is to point out how social rproccesses of labeling and treating someoneas criminally deviant actually fosters deviant behavior and has a negative repercussion for that person because other are likely to be bias toward the offender because of the…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 4 Notes

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Differential Association- Reinforcement: A theory of criminality based on the incorporation of psychological learning theory and differential association with social learning theory. Criminal behavior, the theory claims, is learned through associations and is contained or discontinued as a result of positive or negative reinforcements.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Differential Association-a theory developed by Edwin Sutherland proposing that through interaction with others, individuals learn the values, attitudes, techniques, and motives for criminal behavior (how people learn to become criminals).…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Interactionists argue that a mistake most perspectives make is that they assume lawbreakers are somehow different from law-abiding people. The labelling theory suggests that most people commit deviant and criminal acts but only come are caught and stigmatised for it. It is for this reason that emphasis should be on understanding the reaction and definition of deviance rather than the causes of the initial act.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thank you for your post. I liked your answer to my question. I agree with you that if one were confident with themselves, they will not “follow” others and therefore the differential association theory would not explain deviant actions. It is funny that you brought up the speed limit question. I was driving home from work yesterday and everybody was speeding. I was thinking of how deviant they were! I had never thought of speeding as a deviant act until the activities inventory assignment last week.…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Labelling Theory

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Labelling theory addresses a larger definition of crime, referring not only to illegal conduct or actions but much rather to deviant behaviour in general. Deviance is seen as a quality attributed to a certain act by those who witness it directly or indirectly and deem it immoral and wrong. Behaviours acquire the label of being deviant by social interaction and maintain it by social learning. This new approach is in contradiction with the former views of crime as inherent to the action or behaviour and in some cases excusable by the circumstances such as anomie or social strain, which assume homogenous norms and equal responses or punishments to all those guilty.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Howard Becker is a sociologist that is often credited with the development of the labelling theory. However the origins of this theory can be traced back to sociologists at the beginning of the twentieth century who made invaluable contributions to the creation of the “labelling” concept. The first was Charles Cooley who wrote “Human Nature and the Social Order” in 1902, in which he introduced the term the “looking glass self”. This idea suggests that an individual will respond to society based on how the individual thinks society perceives them. Another was Frank Tannenbaum (1938) who studied juvenile participation in street gangs. He argued that when society defines certain behaviour as deviant, a “tag” is then placed upon the individual that displayed the deviant behaviour, thus causing further deviant / criminal behaviour. Although Cooley and Tannenbaum influenced Becker it was the much later influence of Edwin Lamert that truly led the way. Lemert was, by many of his peers, credited with introduction of the ‘original’ version of the labelling theory. In Lemert’s 1951 publication, “Social Pathology” he states that primary deviance is the original offence that causes a figure in authority to “label” the offender as deviant. Furthermore he states that if said offender accepts the deviant “label” offered to them, this will result in further deviance, known as secondary deviance. This may then lead to a “self- fulfilling prophecy” causing the individual to live up to their deviant label.…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lilly's Labeling Theory

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thus, when discussing labeling theory, it can be assumed that society is the most responsible for the deviant behaviors of its citizens for various reasons. The first, and presumably most significant, is the fact that powerful citizens are in charge of determining which behaviors are considered criminal and which ones are not. For example, wife battering was only criminalized when individuals were motivated to create legal reform, it was not always a crime (Lilly, 2015). Society is also responsible for such behaviors because they construct the labels that lead citizens to make negative assumptions about offenders that are often times untrue (Lilley et al., 2015). As a result, these assumptions influence people’s reactions to offenders, making room for stereotyping and stigmas that produce unequal treatment for all offenders (Lilly, 2015). For example, a murder takes places in our community. While the murder itself is considered a socially deviant act, weather or not it will be viewed as a homicide depends upon the reaction of others, rather than the act itself (Lilly, 2015). If the victim was a police officer, people are going to react differently than if the victim was a…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Organized Crime Paper

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The differential association theory focus on the social group-environment. In this theory it believes that people who associate with those who do not commit crimes will do the same. The opposite goes for those who are associated with those who does commit crimes (University of Phoenix,…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Labeling Theory

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Labeling Theory begins with the idea that people will be at odds with one another because their values and beliefs differ. Certain people then gain power and translate their normative and value preferences into rules which govern institutional life which gives the position to place negative labels on those who do not follow their rules, calling them deviants. Howard S. Becker popularized this labeling perspective. He believed that deviance results from social judgments relative to group norms that are applied as labels to certain forms of behavior. Becker stated: “Social groups create deviance by making the rules whose infraction constitutes deviance and by applying the rules to particular people and labeling them as outsiders”. He felt that studying the act of the individual was unimportant because deviance is simply rule breaking behavior that is labeled deviant by persons in positions of power.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays