When the same scenes are described in different ways, many things inevitably change. As each writer has his/her own idea about how the scenes should look on paper, the results may differ significantly. In this essay two works are compared the epic Beowulf and John Gardner's novel Grendel. The differences between them arise because the authors concentrate on different details. As a result of the lack/presence of suspense, the choice of the point of view, and the choice between telling' and showing', these two works differ. In the original Beowulf, the hero's fight with Grendel lacks suspense. Throughout the whole scene the author makes sure the readers know how the battle will end with Grendel's doom. In the following examples, he repeats the same message in different ways:
"Close to the building crept the slayer,
Doomed to misery."
"But Wyrd had otherwise willed his doom;
Never again should he get a victim
After that night."
"But a woeful end awaited the wretch,
That very day he was doomed to depart,
And fare afar to the fiends' domain."
In the newer version, however, the outcome of the battle is revealed only at the last possible moment. This happens because in Grendel the story is told by Grendel himself. He is very strong; moreover, he had never met his match before. As a result, he is so confident of his success that he admits to himself that he will die only after he is mortally wounded by Beowulf. o
"The room goes suddenly white, as if struck by lightning
He has torn off my arm at the shoulder
I really will die!" The change in the point of view is rather important when comparing these two works. Beowulf is told in the third person narrative. Here, the author concentrates on the actions of the characters and on the battle itself. This might not be very appealing to some readers. Gardner's version, written from the point of view of Grendel, the monster, should be more interesting to read. The writer gets inside the head of Grendel and...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document