Preview

Differences Between Search And Seizure

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
546 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Differences Between Search And Seizure
So, in any case where Search and Seizure is acceptable, is there a way to compensate for the damages done during a search and seizure. One type of damage one can be compensated for is called compensatory damages. This is the typical type of damage that is thought of during a search a seizure. For example, while officers are searching your apartment, and a sofa was ripped in the process, then the person can receive full compensation for the value of the item that is damaged. Another damage that can be compensated for is pain or income loss. This could be if someone was incarcerated while the trial was still pending, and they happened to loose their job in the process, then the government will compensate for the value of the income lost.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    LEG 100 Final Exam
    • 5282 Words
    • 22 Pages

    LEG 100 Final Exam

    Question 2 5 out of 5 points Which of the following is not a part of the measure of compensatory damages? Answer Selected Answer: Correct Answer: Damages to deter others from engaging in similar conduct. Damages to deter others from engaging in similar conduct.…

    • 5282 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Richards SEARCH AND SEIZURE DBQ
    • 504 Words
    • 1 Page

    Richards SEARCH AND SEIZURE DBQ

    violation of DLK’s rights because they did not go in the house. They used a thermal imager yes…

    • 504 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fundamental Differences Between Search And Seizure Policies
    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page

    Fundamental Differences Between Search And Seizure Policies

    Some of the fundamental differences between the Americans and English were the idea of a monarchy, the search and seizure policies, and their judicial interpretations. In England, when the Magna Carta was written, it was used to limit the king’s power without completely taking it away. In America, the Constitution was written in such a way that the president’s power was equal to that of the other two branches of government. America was afraid of a ruler becoming too strong. Another contrast was the policy of search and seizure. The British created the writs of assistance, which allowed the government to take the property of anyone under the suspicion of any crime. The fourth amendment of the Constitution, however, protected anyone from the…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    LA 245 Study Guide
    • 6344 Words
    • 24 Pages

    LA 245 Study Guide

    Compensatory damages: money intended to restore a plaintiff to the position he was in before the jury…

    • 6344 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Civil Tort Complaint Example
    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Civil Tort Complaint Example

    The Plaintiff suffered damages from the wrongful assault by Bryce Caldwell including, pain and suffering, emotional distress, and other damages.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Salem Witch Trials Facts
    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Salem Witch Trials Facts

    compensation was paid as restitution to the families of those who were affected; much of the…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Difference Between Judicial Restraint Theory And Judicial Activism
    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Difference Between Judicial Restraint Theory And Judicial Activism

    The judicial restraint theory is based off the idea that judges should limit the exercise of their own power. For example, it would make judges think before shooting down laws, just because they can, with the exception being that they are unconstitutional. The opposite of judicial restraint is judicial activism. Judicial activism is when judges make rulings based on politics or personal beliefs rather than the law itself. The main difference between these two philosophies is judicial restraint is a bit more ethical then judicial activism. Both Clarence Thomas and Sonia Sotomayor are minorities to the Supreme Court. However, they both have very different viewpoints when it comes to how their race and background play a role in their rulings.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The concept of stop and frisk
    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The concept of stop and frisk

    In an effort to maximize an individuals rights during search and seizures along with stop-and-frisks, the United States government has developed numerous laws and amendments. The Fourth Amendment states, The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched , and the persons or things to be seized (U.S. Constitution). This amendment was first used in the court system in the case of Terry vs. Ohio (1968). This case was the case that shaped the stop-and-frisk laws that are found in our country today. In 1942 legislators started to authorize stops-and-frisks on less than probable cause under the Uniform Arrest Act. This act gave an officer the right stop a person in public based upon reasonable ground to suspect that the person is committing has committed, or is about to commit a crime, and then search him for a dangerous weapon if the officer has reasonable ground to believe that he is in danger (Whitebread, 2000). In 1968 the Supreme Court addressed the issue in terry v. ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889. In Terry an experienced plainclothes officer observed three men acting suspiciously; they were walking back and forth on a street and peering into a particular store window. The officer concluded that the men were preparing to rob a nearby store and approached them. He identified himself as a police officer and asked for their names. Unsatisfied with their responses, he then subjected one of the men to a frisk, which produced a gun for which the suspect…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Search and Seizure: in Plain Smell
    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Search and Seizure: in Plain Smell

    Rules for searches conducted in plain smell are complex and varied based on the circumstances and location of the search. Under the plain smell doctrine, an officer can use his sense of smell as probable cause to search if there is an articulable belief that the origination of the odor is an illegal substance, or if it indicates an exigent circumstance. Plain smell is a principle under the plain view rule, which basically states that evidence in plain view of an officer is not protected by the Fourth Amendment, as “seeing” the evidence in that capacity does not constitute a “search”. For the plain view doctrine to apply for discoveries, the following requirements must be met (Horton v. California, (1990) 496 U.S. 128,136):…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Unlawful Arrest
    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Unlawful Arrest

    How has the implementation of Martial law impact the increase in Unlawful Arrest in the United States from 1863-2015?…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Difference Between Civil Rights And Civil Liberties
    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Difference Between Civil Rights And Civil Liberties

    Ortiz 4 Flor Ortiz Professor Sherry Sharifian Gov 2305-73012 10 February 2018 Civil Rights Vs. 1 Civil Liberties Are civil rights and civil liberties the same thing? Many People believe it that way. There is a big difference between civil rights and civil liberties and you shouldn’t confuse them because that can change how you live your life. The differences between these two are that civil rights mean that you cannot be discriminated or treated differently and to get equal treatment.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil Liberties Vs Civil Rights
    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Civil Liberties Vs Civil Rights

    Every US citizen is born with Civil liberties and Civil Rights (or given when they become a citizen) They are very important and are a fundamental part of the constitution. Civil Liberties and Civil Rights are both almost the same except civil liberties protect individuals from the government and civil rights are rights every US citizen has.. Civil rights are rights that are given to US citizens they are rights to political and social freedom and equality. They include the first ten amendments of the bill of rights these amendments in the constitution are the right to bare arms, right to freedom of religion, the right to vote and even the freedom of the press. Civil Liberties are basic rights and freedoms that protect individuals from the…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    CJA 484 Criminal Law Foundations Evaluation
    • 1424 Words
    • 4 Pages

    CJA 484 Criminal Law Foundations Evaluation

    References: Kerr, O. (2005, December). Search and Seizures in a Digital World. Harvard Law Review, Vol. 119,(Issue 2), p. 531-585. Retrieved June 22, 2013…

    • 1424 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Illegal Searches of Prisoners and Those on Parole and Probation
    • 2812 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Illegal Searches of Prisoners and Those on Parole and Probation

    The criminal justice system works in such a way that certain behavior or actions are legislated as a criminal offense wherein the state or the federal government can prosecute an offender even if only being suspected. In this case, there exists rules or limits into which protection are of highest concerns. It does not only apply to civilian suspects but also extends to actual prisoners, and to those who are on parole and under probation. But in reality, it has become a worldwide issue in terms of illegal searches. It has even been stipulated in the U.S. Constitution 's Bill of Rights stating that these restrictions start on the premises of the rights to refuse to testify against oneself, the right to confront one 's accuser and the right to a trial by jury for people charged with crimes. But these federal protections may not always seem to hold especially when police enforcers are dealing with prisoners, people on parole and on probation status. This happens because the jurisdictions regarding these matters depend on the ruling court. The court regulates and decides whether the legislative rule, court practice or police action is permissible under the federal and state constitutional law. From here, we can say during the course of searches, we should be aware and vigilant of possible violations by the apprehending police officers. In such cases, knowledge of the legality, technicality and the law should at least be required or at least explained to the person being searched. As mentioned a while ago, the case becomes quite sensitive for people who are imprisoned, on parole and under probation. The situation for them is very difficult in the sense that they are…

    • 2812 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REGULATIONS OF ARREST AND DETENTION
    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages

    THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REGULATIONS OF ARREST AND DETENTION

    I think that there are not enough reasonable grounds for an arrest without a warrant. I think more reasonable grounds should be put into place in order to arrest someone without a warrant. This is because I think that if a victim phones the police with a worry they should arrest a person to stop them from doing something, however they usually wait until something has actually happened to the victim or their property.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics