Preview

Difference Between Principalities And Republics

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1189 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Difference Between Principalities And Republics
In the start principalities and republics have been discussed as two types of states. Principalities can be further classified as one which is coming through generations i.e. inherited and the other one is newly acquired. The new principalities can be, either acquired through strength or luck, added to the old ones or can be set up as a new one. Theses principalities can be under the rule of prince or can be as a free land. The principalities running down in heritage are comparatively easier to maintain and the prince’s rule tends to be stable because of the norms and culture being followed there.
The newly acquired territories, if following the similar traditions as the heritage ones, were easy to rule because the way they lead their lives
…show more content…
Agathocles came into power, although having strength, by unfair means, which brought him power but could not bring him exaltation. Moreover Oliverotto came into power by killing but later on was murdered himself. These sort of unfair acts can be justified once when the prince is getting into power but if the frequency of such acts tend to increase then they can’t be justified. People should not only sustain such unfair handling but they should also be given some fair dealings with time.
In civil principalities, the ruler is chosen amongst the locals but the leader can also be chosen by the nobles. When nobles want to gain control they want a ruler to be made amongst them and when people are oppressed they want the prince to be amongst them. No matter how the prince is selected, he shouldn’t forget his role of helping people and strive to bring about good for everyone. And once he realizes this fact, there are really less chances of him being grassed by his
…show more content…
The ruler can either have an army of his own or rely upon others. Fortification of the city is involved in the later stage of prince’s strength. One more type of state is the one in which the ruler’s control is never ending. No matter how he acts or treats his people, the citizens never raise any question against him. It is referred to as ecclesiastical state. Army to defend the state can be either of the prince or some mercenaries. But its best to have a prince’s army as mercenaries might turn against the control by gaining more power. The popes gained power in the Roman Empire in a similar manner. Learning the art of war is really important for the prince as it is really crucial skill to maintain control of his area. Hunting can prove out to be a good exercise in this regard as it not only improves the strength but also makes the prince familiar with his area.
To appear generous the prince has to put up a frugal outlook. To put up this show of generosity the prince has to charge more taxes and it might agitate the people. So a more intelligent prince will act a little miser and save up the resources when they are actually needed. A prince should be caring but this mercy and care should not be taken for granted. If both love and fear can’t be implemented simultaneously, then fear should be implemented. An intelligent ruler has to decide upon the conditions that what is going to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Joseph Stalin Dbq Analysis

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Over the course of time, rulers are known as sovereigns who protect their empire as well as their people. They are required to sustain order, harmony as well as being content with their empire. Throughout history we have seen many leaders the good & the bad. Not all leaders were willing to listen to their people, as well as giving them what they want but some enforced their power and struck fear into their people. Rulers did many things throughout the course of history to show and acquire dominance across their empire, Louis XIV of France & Joseph Stalin of the Soviet Union are prime examples who used terror and manipulation to gain sovereignty of their empires.…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Early modern Western Europe faced political changes from 1500-1750. These were based on three main political ideas: monarchy, balance of power, and religious reforms. The main type of government became monarchies, which had one main ruler and a parliament. The parliament was a group of state-elected legislatures, used to represent the citizens. Document five, Political Craft and Craftiness on page 420-421, explains the qualities that Machiavelli thought that a prince should have to be a proper prince. In the past, empires had one ruler and that was it, which meant that the citizens had no say in what was going on in the government. This made the process of law-making more fair than if just one person were making all of the decisions. Balance…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavellian princedoms had mighty military forces that usually used brute force and size to annihilate enemies. The military would draft peasants if needing more troops. They would also destroy…

    • 514 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    rules and guidelines made the kings seem selfish. Machiavelli had said in his book how a ruler…

    • 709 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    City States vs. Empires

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    With the advancement and development of city-states to empires, culture and economics changed drastically. The social classes of the two arrangements of civilizations were altered, but some factors stayed the same. In ancient city-states, councils of nobles usually governed and ruled. In the Greek city-state of Athens a democracy and ruling of the people was established. Numerous councils were opened up to the people of Athens, for their voices to be heard. As we moved into empires, social classes become more apparent with a ruler, or emperor, on top and other classes falling below him. In both organizations, there is some type of hierarchy leader on top, whether it is the emperor or the leader of the council or general in high office, such as Solon.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machiavelli Paper

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When acquiring new territory the best way to set it up from the perspective of a prince is as a principality, because then you have all of the power, which is the goal when taking over a new territory. In order to maintain the power you must gain the trust of the people, and turn it in to fear but not hatred. From the perspective of a prince that is the best way to preserve control of your subjects.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nothing brings a prince more reputation than great enterprises and proof of his capacity. Princes who can frankly said who their…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The title of king itself supplies the bearer with too much power for which one man can hold. "All Men are created equal." He had none that denied him of any of his wants and desires, whether personally or politically. A ruler must only be able to derive their "Powers from the Consent of the Governed," of which the king had none. Wise rulers must surround themselves with those they trust. The best rulers truly represent their people.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The best definition of a sovereign state is one that is ruled by an authoritative government and is independent of external control, has the power to pass laws, and preserves order by enforcing those laws. The goal of an early modern monarch was to acquire absolute power within his/her state. The concept of the absolute authority of the state was one of the most prominent Roman influences on Western Civilization. According to this concept, the state can do no wrong and the individual has no rights except those that the state confers upon him or her. Countering this was the medieval legacy which resulted in diversity of many kinds: language, laws, customs,…

    • 36747 Words
    • 147 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli insists that a ruler must do whatever is in his power to rule his people regardless of whether his actions are moral or immoral and that "...it is safer to be feared than to be loved when one of the two must be lacking....For one can generally say this about men: that they are ungrateful, fickle, simulators and deceivers, avoiders of danger, greedy for gain, and while you work for their good they are completely yours, offering you their blood, their property, their lives, and their sons..." (Jacobus 44). These comments support…

    • 1033 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are reasons why many of history’s greatest empires have tended to be either oligarchic or monarchial in nature. In observing the development of two of the ancient world’s most prominent models of representative government, the Athenian democracy and the Roman Republic, it can be concluded that when coupled with the political, economic, and social changes that come with expansion, the complications inherent with systems with democratic design prove incapable of running an empire.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is a Country to Do?

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The man who is to be king must be both loved and respected by the people. He must…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What also happens when you give a ruler too much power, they will do everything possible to control every aspect of everybody’s life, such as in Antigone, Creon is telling everyone what to do and punishes them if they don’t. He punishes Antigone for burying Polyneices, her brother who Creon did not think was worthy of a burial, and he also threatens the sentry if he does not find the person who buried Polyneices saying,…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sometimes there are rulers who listen to their people and try to fix a problem, however there are some who are out there for themselves and don’t care or…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    which will not be difficult, for all they ask is not to be oppressed… all else seek to win the populace over to his side. Which will be easy to do if he protects their interests” (Machiavelli 32). This an important point that every ruler should have into account if they want to have a loyal populace, it is in some way logical and realist: if a ruler stays in good terms with his people, then they will follow him; if this person is not on the side of the people, then why should the people should him?…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays