Preview

Difference Between Malinowski And Radcliffe-Brown

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
349 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Difference Between Malinowski And Radcliffe-Brown
Bronisław Malinowski and Alfred Radcliffe-Brown are two anthropologists who contributed greatly to their field of study. Both considered themselves to be functionalists. The key difference between these two is how they explain the function of religion, more specifically whose needs did religion take care of. Both were influenced by Émile Durkheim, who believed that religion was an entity that all societies needed in order for them to be united and held together.
Malinowski defined religion with a functionalist theory of human needs, more specifically, the needs of an individual. He thought of religion as a form a psychological support for someone facing death. On the other hand, Radcliffe-Brown claimed that religion went beyond the individual.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Religion has held an important role in society since the beginning of civilisation and it has such power over people’s minds and shape the way our world developed. Whilst some sociological theories such as functionalist sees religion as performing a positive function in society as it can lead to social solidarity, integrating people into society, other sociological theories such as Marxist and Feminist totally disagrees with this and would argue that religion leads to instability and conflict in society.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The most common failing in defining religion is in failing to account for the many different nuances and possible expressions of religion (Molloy, 2013). One possible definition of religion is a unified set of beliefs, shared among a group, to connect with an idea of the sacred. This definition may be discounted due to its lack of reference to the worship of the divine; however not all religions are focused on the worship of a divine (Molloy, 2013). Another objection to the proposed definition is the requirement of a group. Requiring that a group hold the beliefs, however, can be said to what separates personally held faith and religion. The separation of faith and religion is vital to the study of religion because, even within a single religion, the privately held faith can change from one individual to the other. Lastly, this definition, by relying solely on the beliefs rather than the rituals, symbolism, and myths, allows for the existence of religions that may lack them, so long as the group shares the underlying beliefs of the religion.…

    • 859 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In C.E.M. Joad's essay "How Religion Arose, and Why it Flourished," Religion is described as a “psychological need.” Joad explains that we use God as a comfort device. Religious people look to God to abolish their fears that they may have. Joad argues that people are simply afraid of death. Joad claims believing in God is a security blanket; that God will protect them in death. I do not believe that religion is just a psychological device to make our lives better. I have faith and believe in God for the miracles he performs and guidance he provides in my life.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whether analysed on a personal or public level, the subject of religion assumes a significant role within the 21st century. According to Malory Nye in his book Religion The Basics, “Religion is everywhere in today’s world…” (8) and involves everyone via world events such as “the war on terror, abortion clinic killings, Jonestown mass suicides…” (11). By simply reading the newspaper, or turning on the television, one is actively engaging with religion. However, Jonathan Z. Smith suggests that “Religion is solely the creation of the scholar’s study. It is created for the scholar’s analytic purposes by his [or her] imaginative acts of comparison and generalization. Religion has no existence apart from the academy” (Smith 1982: xi). It is important to distinguish between two common uses of religion, one being as a category used by scholars to analyze aspects of different societies and two being the idea of religion which is publicized in the media and exposed to the general public. However, the term religion itself cannot be defined by one person and one view. Religion requires the knowledge and experiences of individuals in order to diversify the current culture and society. As highlighted by Nye, religion is used profusely by people all over the world, not only scholars; therefore, the study of religion cannot be limited to the interpretation of scholars because it primarily concerns people and their cultures (12).…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Webster, Religion is defined as a personal set or institutionalized system of beliefs, attitudes and practices. An alternate source defines Religion as the belief in and worship of a god or gods, or a set of beliefs concerning the origin and purpose of the universe. Throughout history we can note that religion has played a major role in various cultures, political changes as well as social society.…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Using material from Item A and elsewhere, assess the functionalist view that religion benefits both society as a whole and its individual members.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Functional definitions of religion defines religion in terms of the social or psychological functions it performs for individuals or society.…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Functionalists have put forward their perspective on religion and how it benefits both society and the individual starting with how religion brings people together harmoniously, creating social cohesion and a sense of belonging as people believe in the same thing and all abide by the same rules. Religion creates and maintains a value consensus whilst giving society social order. By conforming to religious beliefs this allows us to gain morals and therefore Functionalists see religion as a positive aspect to society.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The definition of religion is the belief in a superhuman controlling power, especially a God or gods. Religion is important to people because some people need that comfort that after they die, something filling and happy will happen to them, such as Heaven or Reincarnation. Religion is important to people because, some people like to have the feeling that someone is watching over them, and is guiding them through their life. While researching two different world religions (Christianity and Islam) , this essay will contribute ideas on the spread of religion, how people view religions and compare and contrast religions to each other to find similarities and differences.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Religion brings society together, by different individuals sharing the same religion and beliefs. These individuals meet up in big groups such as mass and church. To make these social interactions the society arranges different events and groups, where individuals can go for support, advice and answers. Many individuals who are religious follow the same religion as their family; this is because religion is most often passed down the generation in families. Some individuals change their beliefs to ask questions such as “why am I born” “why do I suffer?” “Is there an afterlife?” Some religion can control social norms like birth control, abortions, clothing, and food. The main functionalist sociologist is Emile Durkheim, his argument was that societies divide the world into two parts, which are the sacred and the irreligious. The sacred support their own religions (Christianity, Islamic, Jews etc.) however the irreligious do not believe in any of the religions. Even the irreligious pray to a god or attend church sometime in their…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Define Religion

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although most people have an idea of what they think religion means, when asked to actually put their definition into words, it proves to be much more difficult. Gary Kessler states that a good definition should be "useful for the purposes at hand, as precise as possible without being to narrow in scope, and as free from bias as possible" (14). Keeping this in mind, I have come to define religion as system of beliefs that seeks to find order within the universe, purpose in life, and the meaning behind death. Throughout history people have sought out answers for the fundamental questions of human existence: Why are we here? Does everything happen for a reason, or are they mere random occurrences? What happens when you die? People use religion…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are a variety of different definitions of religion including substantive definitions, which refers to focusing on the content or substance of a religious belief such as God, functional definitions, which refers to religion in terms of the social or psychological functions it carries out for the individual and there are also social constructionist definitions which focus on how members of society actually define religion. Functionalists hold a consensus view and argue that society requires both social order and solidarity in order for it to run smoothly, and religion is one way of providing this as it encourages shared norms and values.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A religion can be seen as a unified system of beliefs and practices which are relative to sacred things and beliefs (Giddens 1972, p.224). It can shape ones thoughts and feelings and gives people a sense of hope and something to believe in. All three main sociologist writers Karl Marx, Max Weber and Emile Durkheim offer different perspectives on religion and how important it is to society. Some of the theorists chose to have a positive view whilst others argue the unimportance of religion. This essay attempts to discover which theorist has the most accurate perspective of religion in modern times. This is done by firstly explaining the basic ideas regarding to religion put forward by Marx, Weber and Durkheim. Then both Marx's and Durkheim's thought will be compared and contrasted in order to determine the differences and similarities between their ideas. Finally, it will be explained which one of the theorists views and ideas are the most relevant to contemporary times and why.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sociological Theory

    • 1940 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Our understanding of religion has been influenced by the contributions of sociological theory. Functionalists view religion in terms of how religion contributes to society. Durkheim claims that the one purpose that all religions serve is ‘the celebration of the social group’. A religion is a way of fulfilling social cohesion and satisfying societies need for a community. For example the aboriginal society, they were a community split in to tribes that worship a particular totem. Durkheim claims that the function of the totem is to create a clan identity. Members of the clan may have nothing else in common apart from their collective conscience, which is their shared norms, values, beliefs and knowledge. Therefore when the…

    • 1940 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Defining Religion

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the functional definitions that were defined in the book and by Clifford Geertz, I found little error and would like to expand on my opinion on their definitions. The book defined religion, if I remember correctly as, any person 's reliance upon a pivotal value was that person finds essential wholeness as an individual and as a person-in-community." Well, I broke the definition down into similar terms to appreciate its meaning. I interpreted this definition as someone 's dependence on an essential value where that person finds it necessary for personal completeness. In other words ones religion is what it takes for that individual to feel complete, I do not feel that this is true for all religions. Now when I broke it down for my personal clarity, I found error in this definition. Not all people practicing a religion would agree that they depend on their religion to complete them as a whole. Yes this would be true of most religions but not of all religions. That is why I find it erroneous when it is being used to define a word that has many more options for words of choice than referring to it as being necessary for wholeness,…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays