Preview

Did Stalin's Accomplishments Justify His Means

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
498 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Did Stalin's Accomplishments Justify His Means
Did Stalin’s accomplishments justify his means? While in some ways his methods prepared Russia for World War II and caught the country up with the rest of the world, his methods for reforming the Soviet Union were brutal, cut throat and resulted in the deaths of millions. Therefore, after much thought, I have come to the conclusion that Stalin’s accomplishments did not make up for the horrid acts he committed for the ‘greater good.’ During the time that he was in power, it is estimated that he was responsible for the deaths of around 20 million of his own people, not including the millions more that perished in WWII. Stalin himself was ruthless and paranoid and the people lived in fear, Stalin the only person truly safe from the midnight disappearances and …show more content…
People feared being taken by the Secret Police in the ‘bread trucks’ and of being sent to the Gulag in Siberia where survival in the brutal conditions was highly unlikely. At one point at least one in twenty people were in the Gulag, and as a result, the country ran largely on slave labour. Although many argue that Stalin prepared Russia for the war, it also should be noted that he killed off at least 50 per cent of the army officers during the Purges out of pure paranoia, leaving the army brutally unprepared for war. The some accomplishments and advances are therefore overshadowed by the loss and suffering. Most people were unable to even reap the benefits while dying, locked in the Gulag or living in a state of constant fear. And if Stalin had been on the “wrong side” in the war would he still be viewed by the world as the same man? In fact many believe that he was just as bad as Hitler himself. Slaughtering millions should not be overshadowed by the few positives and should not just be just diminished to a means to an end for the greater good of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Joseph Stalin Dbq Analysis

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Joseph Stalin established a modern totalitarian government in Soviet Russia. He is known as the “Man of Steel”. A totalitarianism is a type of government that takes total, centralized, state control over every aspect of public and private life of their people. His rule had changed the people of his empire in numerous ways. Stalin had total control over economic needs. According to document 6 “By 1940 Russia produced more pig iron than Germany, and far more than Britain or France. Numbers of cattle grew in the 1920s, but fell increasingly during the collectivization of agriculture after 1929, and by 1940 hardly exceeded the figure for 1920. Since 1940 the industrial development of the Soviet Union has been impressive, but agricultural production has continued to be plumiding”. The document illustrates how pig iron had significantly increased as a result of the “Five Year Plan”, however heavy industry led to expense of food supplies. This would cause limited production of consumer goods. It caused a step back because of the severe shortages of housing, food, clothing as well as other necessary goods. The Five Year Plan didn’t help much to excel their economic as Stalin hoped, it impacted by creating famine. Stalin rising to power promised an economic boom for Russia however, in that process many people suffered and died of starvation. According to document 5, “The purge began its last,…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In terms of social the soviet people experienced the same harsh treatment during the war as before the war in terms of punishment. There was less purges during the war but the NKVD was still active during the war, led by Beria they still punished the soviet people if they were dishonest and disloyal to the soviet people. They were still very harsh and the soviet people despite dealing with a war also had to deal with this. The war killed up to 1 fifth of soviet people, both innocent people and soldiers, this had major impacts on the soviet people due to many families being destroyed and manpower was drawn short so people had to work longer hours in the factories. Other social costs during the war consisted of many of the soviet people being took by the Nazis and put into labour camps. These labour camps meant certain deaths and up to 100 000 soviet people were took into these camps and not many of them were to return after the war. Also during the war Stalin did some good for the ordinary people in terms of that he did reintroduce the churches to give people hope in terms of religion. This increased morale within the soviet people and made people maybe appreciate Stalin more.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many historians, including myself would agree with the argument that the USSR achieved victory over Germany in spite of Stalin, not as a result of his leadership. However, its validity can be questioned as there are several points contradicting the argument, suggesting that Stalin was in fact a successful wartime leader. Even points such as Stalin being a hearty Georgian should be taken into account as it gives an insight into his motives and ‘rise to power’.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stalin is known as one of the most brutal and ruthless dictators in human history. He feared that the Ukraine, the largest of the non-Russian republics, was a threat to his Communist empire. In 1929, Stalin eliminated any threat from Ukrainian nationalists. Over 5,000 spiritual and intellectual leaders such as priests, bishops, writers, professors, and scientists were arrested and either murdered or sent to prison camps in Siberia. They were falsely blamed of planning a rebellion, but Stalin’s motive was to eliminate those who could organize and resist. This left the common citizens without any guidance or direction (Gavin).…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin are widely regarded as the greatest tyrants of the twentieth century, accountable for more violent deaths than any other leaders in history. Both have been individually and collectively labeled mass murders, tyrants, “authors of terror”, and even “twin demons of the twentieth century”. The shared political methodology of both dictators was heavily based around totalitarianism. Their apparatus of power and repression led to absolute and ruthless authority over the population of their respective nations. The disparity in Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin’s rise to power, economy, policies, totalitarian rule and methodology confirm who the greater oppressor was.…

    • 3537 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Josephe Stalin DBQ

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Stalin presented himself as if he were greater and more powerful than everyone else (DOC 10.) Unfortunately for him the people of Russia didn’t see this characteristic; Stalin’s methods damaged the Russians. His act of collectivization was found to be extremely unfair and hurtful. Numerous actions were taken place…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Khrushchev’s vilification of Stalin in his address to the Twentieth Party Congress was meticulous in detailing precise failures of his predecessor’s rule. Above all, Khrushchev strongly elaborated on Stalin’s extremities, especially the cult of personality that he had built up over the years. The speech also in turn attacked ‘Stalinist repressions, arrests, terror and murders…[and] for bungling foreign affairs and mishandling the war’. Despite this, Khrushchev was cautious in limiting his other criticisms of Stalin, and it was this focus on him as an individual rather than of the overall Soviet system that defined the boundaries of acceptable criticism. As such, the speech sought to condemn Stalin without endangering the party’s validity or the system that had indeed allowed Khrushchev to rise to power.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stalin and Purges

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The aim of this investigation is to assess how the purges of 1934-38 helped Stalin preserve his power in the Soviet Union. In order to evaluate this, the investigation assesses Stalin’s role in relation to the purges, as well as their purpose. An analysis of this should indicate the extent to which the purges were successful, and their contribution to Stalin’s power. In the section entitled Evaluation of Sources, two sources used for this investigation (The Great Terror: A Reassessment, and Origins of the great purges: the Soviet Communist Party reconsidered, 1933-1938) are evaluated according to their values, limitations, origins, and purposes.…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin Dbq

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1917, Russia was crumbling into pieces. The World War I was draining all of Russia’s resources. There was shortage of food throughout the country, which left people starving. At the battlefront, millions of Russian soldiers were dying, they did not possess many of the powerful weapons that their opponents had. The government under Czar Nicholas II was disintegrating, and a provisional government had been set up. In November of 1917, Lenin and his communist followers known as the Bolsheviks overthrew the provisional government and set a communist government in Russia. However, in 1924, Lenin died and Josef Stalin assumed leadership of the Soviet Union, which was the name for the communist Russia. Stalin was a ruthless leader who brought many changes to the Soviet Union. Stalin’s goal was to transform the Soviet Union into a modern superpower and spread communism throughout the world, and he was determined to sabotage anyone who stood in his way. He used many methods such as collectivization, totalitarianism and five year plan’s to achieve his goals. Stalin’s rule brought both harmful and beneficial consequences to the Soviet Union; however, the negative factors were so terrible, that they overwhelm the positive factors.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through the show trials and ‘The Terror’, Stalin shaped the Communist Party and Soviet society to a significant extent from 1934 to 1941 through the use of fear and control to assume total power with no opposition. The Great Terror aimed to target individuals who undermined Stalin’s regime, and was catalysed by the assassination of Sergei Kirov, a Bolshevik revolutionary working below Stalin who would often challenge him. Through the use of political purges, Stalin shaped the Communist party to a significant extent, eliminating and denouncing any possible rivals while also creating fear within his government. Similarly, through the show trials and the purges, Stalin significantly restructured society, creating a need for obedience through the use of terror within soviet society. However, Stalin…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the time, Stalin seemed like he was the greatest person on Earth. He made himself seem as if he was above everybody, both physically and mentally. After all of the revolts that were occurring in Russia, he just took over. He went into power right after Lenin had died and took his place, over Trotsky who also wanted to rule over Russia. Well he didn’t and we can’t change that. All we can do is remember Stalin and remember all of the things he did to make people support him and his cause to industrialize Russia.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fear. It’s a powerful force and often what both drives us and restricts us. Fear can be a powerful motivator to accomplish things that many would otherwise consider unimaginable- sometimes with a negative outcome. Consider the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War Two, in which fear that citizens of Japanese ancestry would act as spies caused America enact one of their worst human rights violations. Also consider the extreme case of Joseph Stalin, in which fear of betrayal and sabotage caused him to murder and execute members of his own government, many of whom were actually loyal. While many historians and psychiatrists have since argued that Stalin’s paranoia stemmed from underlying mental conditions, his terrible actions were…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin's Great Terror

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    His followers loved him so much and were so loyal they would do anything for him, like “If it was necessary to cut you to pieces, [stalin's people] cut you to pieces.” He was very involved with the killing, and if he wasn’t involved he planned it, and watched. If Stalin didn’t kill you he would send you to a gulag. A gulag was labour camp where Stalin would send his enemies. Was it better to live and be sent to a gulag? Or be tortured and die? He would do anything to make sure anyone unloyal to him, a person able to lead, or anyone he disliked would disappear. If he didn’t kill them he might have left them to physically and mentally scarred they couldn’t even imagine disliking Stalin. This was one of the worst events in history, and it went unnoticed by Russia’s own people as it went down.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    of society.” A prime example of oppression justified by “bettering the society” are the policies of the Russian Dictator, Joseph Stalin. Stalin believed in order to survive as a whole the russian people must work to increase economic standing against advanced capitalist nations. Stalin’s speech entitled “The Need For Progress” provides proof of his stance, “Do you want our socialist fatherland to be beaten and to lose its independence? If you do not want this, you must put an end to its backwardness-in the shortest possible time and develop a genuine Bolshevik tempo in…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin was more effective than any other ruler of Russia in the period 1855 – 1964 in dealing with opposition. How far do you agree?…

    • 1007 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays