Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Development of Common Law and Equity

Better Essays
1093 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Development of Common Law and Equity
Development of common law and equity

Introduction
I have been asked to write a essay on the development of common law and equity. Common law refers to the law created by judges that was historically significant but has been since replaced by parliament common law is the basis of our law today it is an unwritten law that developed from customs and judicial decisions. It is parallel with equity which refers to the source of law created by the Lord Chancellor which was designed to supplement the common law and allow people the opportunity to avoid problems. Equity is 'the gloss on the common law'.
The following essay will go through step by step on how common law and equity have developed between the years 1066 to our present day.
In 1066 William the Conqueror invaded England, he found a country with no centralized legal system. It was William who set events in motion to bring about the system of law we have today. The law in 1066 was based on local custom with Local courts and Borough Courts applying the law as per the custom of the area.
William decided to centralize the law establishing a strong central government to control the land. To do this he arranged all the local custom based laws, discarding the laws which would not work, and keeping the laws which he thought did work. Those laws which were kept were then applied in ‘common’ by all the courts across the country, this is why it was reffered to as common law. As well as this central government the king appointed judges who travelled to major towns to decide any important cases.
By 1250 a common law had fully developed with rules, which applied to the whole country At first the common law system appeared to be fair but soon became rigid and fixed. A civil action could only be started by way of a writ. The writ sets out the cause of action and the grounds for the claim. Initially, when circumstances arose that were not covered by an existing writ, a new one was created. However, by the end of the13th century this was stopped, so if a person wished to bring a case he/she would need to fit his/her circumstances to an existing writ in order to bring the case to court. This led to hardship as there were not enough writs for the actions people wanted to bring to court.
The other major problem with the common law system was that there was only one solution available at common law, which was money. In some cases money is not the appropriate solution.
As a result of these problems many people either had no right to take their case to court or wanted another solution. Instead of accepting this they petitioned the King for help. The King delegated the power to hear such cases to his Lord Chancellor who heard cases on an individual basis. The Chancellor was not bound by the rigid rules like the common law judges and decided each case on the basis of what he thought fair or equitable. It was then that the system of equity started.
The common law being too rigid required a safety valve to allow people access to justice and different solutions. As his workload increased the Court of Chancery was set up in 1474 to hear cases brought under equity as opposed to the common law.

The most important aspect of equity was that it allowed a person to claim for a solution other than money. By supplementing the common law equity has been described by some as the ‘gloss on the common law’. It adds the finishing touches by offering additional solutions and covers any problems in the common law.
The two systems often came into conflict but it was not until 1615 that this dispute was eventually resolved. In the Earl of Oxford’s case in 1615 there were two conflicting decisions from the common law court and the Court of Chancery. The final decision was referred to King James I. The King’s verdict was that where common and equity conflict then Equity should prevail. Without this decision equity would have been useless and eventually disappeared. This decision ensured the continuation of equity as a system of law available to supplement the common law.
The two systems continued to be administered by the separate courts until the Judicature Acts in 1873-75 the result of these Acts was that courts were merged into one High Court, which could deal with both common law and equity. It also stated that where there is conflict equity will prevail. It is important to remember however, that we still have the two systems; common law being the major one with equity helping out when the court thinks it fair. It also overcame once and for all the problematic writ system as new cases could now be started.
Equity was at first successful and popular being less rigid than the common law in that the court did not have to follow previous cases and could grant new solutions. The most important aspect of equity both historically and today is that it allows a claimant to claim a solution other than money.
Equitable rules have allowed people to gain differrent solutions other than money over the years where they would not have been able to under common law. Modern equitable decisions have often led to Acts of Parliament being passed to reflect equity.
Equity has had a great impact on the law, allowing relief where the common law has failed. It must be remembered that equity’s role both past and present is as an addition to the common law and only available if the common laws solution is inadequate.
When equity was developed it acted as a safety valve in two ways, allowing people access to the court without going through the writ system and access to more solutions. Today there is no rigid writ system but there is still only one solution under common law. Equity therefore today continues to supplement the common law by offering a full range of solutions.
Common law is the basis of our law today it is an unwritten law that developed from customs and judicial decisions simarlarly equity still plays a part today with many of our legal concepts having developed from equitable principles the word equity has a meaning of fairness and this is the basis on which it operates, when adding to our law.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Creation of U.S. Laws

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Thorpe, M. (2012). U.S. Law and the History of English Common Law. Retrieved from http://www.godlessgeeks.com/LINKS/CommonLaw.htm…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    First Continental Congress

    • 2052 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The common law of England was one of the three main historical sources of English law. The other two were legislation and equity. The common law evolved from custom and was the body of law created and administrated by the king’s courts.[7]…

    • 2052 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The origins of criminal law are explored with a brief history of law in England and the law of early America. The history of the common law in England is examined with its influence on American law. The issue of constitutional law is discussed. Other law such as administrative and regulatory law is presented.…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law Opinion Paper

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As the nation started to develop and declared independence from the common law of medieval England, common law was enacted and then adapted to America’s needs.. These laws are based on the interpretation of judges. This is because only the most serious crimes had statues written. For this reason historical common laws are also refered to as judge made laws. In this case, the judges become useful when it comes to comparison of past and present decisions made by a judge in…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Answer: By the reign of henry II, the practice of sending the royal justice throughout the country “on circuit” began to result in fairly uniform body of law developing around the country- the common law. The judges were assisted in finding an agreement among them by keeping records known as plea rolls. They set out not only the facts of each case and judgement, but often the reasoning behind the judgement, in much the same way as the modern law reports does.…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Role and Function of Law

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1) Common Law unlike other laws is laws made by the courts and need not be an act of the legislature. It is based on the fundamentals of previous cases with similar conditions. The traditions of Common Law within the United States can be linked to similar laws used in Britain. Whatever colonies that Great Britain conquered and gained control over, Common Law was the law put in place to govern the people. Common Law stresses the fact that if a case was judge in the past and a verdict was given, similar cases in the future should have similar or the same verdicts.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Common Law Dbq

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1933 a well know metaphor by Ashburner which reads “The two streams of Jurisdiction though they run in the same channel, run side by side they do not mix their waters”. What is meant by this metaphor is that equity and common law operate together they are certainly not governed by the same principals. The Judicature Act also abolished all the old Courts and replaced them with the High Court of Justice. Furthermore, the High Court of Justice is divided into five division’s one Court with five different sections. They are Chancery, Queens Bench, Common Pleas, Exchequer, Probate and Divorce this new court system replaced the old individual courts. “Business is divided between the courts and every Judge of each division was bound to administer whatever rule of law” i.e. common law and…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American Legal System was built from Europe. The settlers brought their rules and principles from England to America and established them in the new colonies. It was known as the common law which was formed from historical events that originated from English events. The laws were formed from Norman Conquest of England. The common law was a system used to settle disputes through local customs, which were part of the English traditions.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Substantive Law

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Common law is a system that was adopted within the U.S. from England. It is based on precedent, legal principles that were established from earlier case law instead of statutory laws. Common law is the traditional law that developed in an area or region from judges when they were settling disputes or cases and these laws change over time. An example is a common law marriage. For instance, a couple lives together and after a period of 7 years the "marriage" or union is then deemed to be legal in some states.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Common law comes from the Anglo-Saxon tradition, it was derived by judges, courts, as well as tribunals through a series of decisions. These decisions were then used to establish precedents whereby those who followed in subsequent decisions had a basis upon which they could make determinations on a proper course of action in any given situation. Common law developed with colonial America in very different ways and whereas most American states base their laws on common law, Louisiana based its laws on the Napoleonic code.…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Political And Legal System

    • 2897 Words
    • 23 Pages

    ■ The basis of common law is tradition, past practices, and legal precedents set by the nation’s courts through interpretation of statutes, legislation, and past rulings. ■ Common law is open to interpretation by courtsit is more flexible than other legal systems. ■ Judges have substantial power to interpret laws based on the unique circumstances of individual cases. Religious law is a legal system strongly influenced by religious beliefs, ethical codes, and moral values, viewed as mandated by a supreme being. ■…

    • 2897 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    laws were mostly influenced by the Old English common law. The concept of stare decisis was…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Magna Carta

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “Under Henry II (r. 1154-1189), England developed and extended a common law – a law common to and accepted by the entire country, unique in medieval Europe” (McKay et al., 2015, pg. 396). When Henry’s son John took the throne, he was a disappointment. When his military lost to France, they made John sign the Magna Carta in 1215, “which became the cornerstone of English justice and law” (McKay et al., 2015, pg. 396).…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aequitas

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    English law has deep historical roots and equity started due to the imperfections of the common law system. In 1066 William 1st invaded and conquered England; he claimed ownership of the country under the concept…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fusion Fallacy

    • 2529 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Prior to the enactment of the Judicature Act 1873, the administration of common law and equity was completely separated. The principles of equity developed in the Court of the Chancery where a ‘petitioner could seek relief from the harsh or unjust operation of the law’.[3] The Chancery Court was a court of conscience charged with ‘an extraordinary power to prevent the injustices and supply the deficiencies that were perceived in the operation of the Common Law’.[4] The disadvantage of this system was that courts of law refused to recognise equitable rights or interests. The Judicature Act 1873 was enacted in order to merge the administration of law and equity. The effect of the Act was the abolition of the old courts and the creation of a new High Court of Justice that combined the jurisdiction of the old courts.[5] The judicature system was implemented in WA by enacting in the Supreme Court Act 1880 (WA) provisions equivalent to the Act. These provisions are now located in sections 16(1), 24 and 25 of the Supreme Court Act 1935 (WA).…

    • 2529 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics