Preview

Describe The Relationship Between The Northern And Southern Colonies In The 1600's

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
479 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Describe The Relationship Between The Northern And Southern Colonies In The 1600's
During the period of 1650 and 1750, English colonies developed fast but into very different shapes in North America. There’re couples of reasons, concluding social, geographic, and economic conditions, for that. John Smith settled in Jamestown, which is a part of the southern colony, looking for gold, however, ends up by growing and trading tobacco to make money; John Winthrop came into New England, which is a part of the northern colony, for religious free; William Pann came into Pennsylvania to spread his thought of religious, Quaker.
First of all, as always, social conditions play the biggest role. By the 1700’s, the northern and southern colonies had already developed into two different societies. This is mainly because the northern and southern colonies had different distinct reasons for settlement. The northern colonies were established for mainly religious freedom, while on the other hand, the southern colonies were established for economic freedom. At the same time, the relationship between Native American and the settlement influence the development a lot as well. The northern colonies especially for Pennsylvania colony, they are Quakers, who treasure equality as one of the most important value. Thus they treated Native American
…show more content…
The climate also affected the different outcome between the north colonies and the South colonies. The north colonies were much colder, as a result, their soil was not good enough for farming, so the people of the north colonies need to find other ways to survive, while on the other hand, the south colonies, which is totally different from the north colonies, had rich soil and the colonists there used that benefit to set up huge plantations and farms. What’s more, southern colonists planted tobacco, which also called “cash crop”, could even earn more than gold since people can easily get addicted to it. On the other hand, northern colonists could only find another way out,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The main cause for the differences in their economy is due to the climate and location of each of the colonies. For example, the Virginia colony had good fertile soil and had the perfect weather condition for growing crops, while on the other hand, Massachusetts was a mountainous region that did not have as good of soil. Because of this, Virginia’s economy was based on crops, mainly tobacco, and the Massachusetts colony had to find other ways to use their natural resources to boast their economy. The Massachusetts colony had a lot of forests and trees, so they specialized in shipbuilding. The New England economy also consisted of fishing, and a small amount of crops, but nothing comparable to what Virginia was putting out in tobacco. The economy was clearly more diverse in the Massachusetts colony but there was something the Virginia colony had that Massachusetts did not, and that was land. Because there was an abundant amount of cheap land, it drew more colonists to that region. Another part of their contrasting economy was trade. Virginia was involved in the triangular trade, which traded slaves from Africa with goods from the colonies and England. Massachusetts trade differed from that of the south in two ways, “The lack of staples to exchange for English goods was a relative disadvantage, but the abundance of their own shipping and mercantile enterprise worked in their favor” (Tindall, 123).…

    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the 1700s, the regions of New England and the Chesapeake experienced dramatic changes and stimulated development due to the increase in immigration from Europe to this new world of the Americas. The immigrants that came to the New England colony differed in terms of reasons for coming and differences in ways of establishing a foundation for the society verses the Chesapeake colony. The differentiating motives, interactions between the natives, and the formation of the structure of society created the differences in development between these two distinct societies.…

    • 692 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    New England and Middle Colonies developed differently because the Anglican Church was persecuting Protestants and Catholics. Therefore these groups settled in New England and not Virginia/Middle Colonies. This impacted political development because the Middle Colonies were for profit, and as a result they developed different politically.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The New England colonies to the north and the southern colonies were vastly different in their economies. The New England colonies' colder climate and low soil fertility made farming in these colonies a struggle. They did however have the advantage in that the coasts of New England were some of the most fertile fishing locations in existence. This led the New England colonies to whaling…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the seventh century, Europeans established colonies in North America. The English colonies were originally established because proprietors from England were granted charters to settle and govern lands. Other European colonies were established around trading posts. Over time, the English gained control of the thirteen colonies through force or purchase; eventually, by regions were known as the Southern, Middle and New England colonies. Although the colonies were under the control of the English and had many commonalities, each region created a distinct culture. These similarities and differences can be evidenced when comparing the role of African Americans, a role of women, and types of settlers of the Middle colonies and The Southern…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the 17th century, many colonies were founded on the North American continent. The most significant colonies were created by Englishmen who left Europe for several reasons. Even though most colonies were founded by fellow Englishmen, there were two regions that evolved into two distinct societies. There were many factors to why these two regions evolved so differently, but the biggest factor were the motives of each colonist.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In our modern, developed world, it can be difficult to imagine how isolated the colonies were from each other. We get news and information at the touch of a button. But in the 17th and 18th centuries, there were few roads that linked one colony to another, and few forms of information other than word of mouth. Most people received more news from Europe than from another region of America. So, each colony grew distinctly from the others, following the local patterns established by the earliest settlers.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The northern and southern colonies were recognized for different purposes, were populated by different groups of people and had different economic bases.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The New England colonies and the Southern colonies are slightly similar in some aspects, but drastically different in most. For example the new england colonies were strictly puritan and they did not tolerate any other religion but the southern colonies were not dominated by a single religion which gave way to more liberal attitudes and some religious freedom. The economy of New England was powered mostly the manufacturing in factories, whereas the Southern colonies’ economies were more agriculturally based. The social structures were different, because the New England colonies didn’t believe in slavery, so the social ladders were not the same. Religious tolerance was another major difference in these two regions. Overall the New England and Southern colonies are slightly similar, but their differences set them apart from each other.`…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Middle Colonies were all royal provinces at one time. The local government was controlled by the people and was different than the New England and Southern Colonies. The type of government was known as the county-town, sometimes call the mixed system which came from the proximity of New England and also the Southern Colonies, somewhat from the character of the population as well as from the climate and physiography of the country. That made life of necessity a medium between those of the New England village and the southern plantation. In New York the township had possessed basically all the powers in the local government. The evolution of Pennsylvania went in the other way. William Penn created a private county system, but as the population…

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There were many similarities and differences in the many different colonies in North America. They all had farming and ranching, with fertile land. They all had basically the same climates in each of these colonies, they had freezing winters and very warm and humid colonies. All of these colonies were by the coast with sandy shores. They all had different founders, in the New England colonies their founder was Thomas Hooker, in the middle colonies their founder was William Penn, and in the southern colonies their founder was George II and James Edward Oglethorpe. They all had different geography, in the New England colonies they had forested hills with sea coasts, in the middle colonies their colonies they had rolling hills with lots of trees,…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The social, economic, and cultural differences between the New England and Southern colonies are a direct result of the characteristics and motivations of the settlers themselves. The geography and topography did not have an immense effect on the differences between the two colonies. The Massachusetts Bay Colony and Plymouth Colony alike were both founded on the pillars of religion. On the contrary, joint stock companies like the Virginia Company traveled in search of wealth in the form of Tobacco. The geography and topography did not have an immense effect on the differences between the two colonies. These two formulated ideas are the basis for what prompted the differences between the North and South of Colonial…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the settlers of the New England and Chesapeake region were both settled by people of English origin, by the 1700s, they had transformed into very different societies. This was because of a number of reasons. Between the settlers, the New Englanders moved for religious purposes, while Chesapeakes moved for want for material wealth.The people of New England also consisted of more families than the predominantly young male population of the Chesapeake. Their governing styles were also different, New England being more about fairness and equity while their southern neighbors were more concerned with gaining material wealth and not about helping the poorer of their communities.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Colonies in the North and South were adversely affected by differences in climate and geography which shaped the political, economic, religious, and social developments in these regions and the future nation they would become.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Differences between the three colonies are distinct. The New England and Middle colonies acquire an identical social structure compared to the South, which has slaves and indentured servants. The New England and Middle colonies dislike discrimination because of their lifestyle, which designates man as equal in God’s eyes. Another dissimilarity is religious toleration. Although the New England colonies have an equal social structure, they do not endure those who possess a different faith other than a Puritan lifestyle. The Middle colonies possess a strong certitude for religious freedom. This is shown in their welcoming of other people of different faiths. The South also possesses some form of religious toleration for others. The economy of the colonies is also different. The New England colonies have a manufacturing type of economy because of the infertile land compared to the Southern colonies, which has a farm-based economy. The environment impacted the economy and agriculture in the New England Colonies; farming was not as important for making a living because of climate and geography. The environment also impacted the economy and agriculture of the Southern Colonies; farming was an important way to make a living because of its climate and geography. The differences between the New England Colonies and the Southern Colonies in agriculture included the climate and geography. The New England Colonies looked to their natural resources as a way to make a living; the environment forced them to look for other ways to make a living other than farming. The Southern Colonies didn't develop all their natural resources as a way to make a living; there was excellent soil for farming income, so there was no need to develop natural resources for manufacturing. The differences in manufacturing occurred between the Southern Colonies and the New England Colonies: The Southern Colonies developed their main natural resource, their farmland, and not much manufacturing; the…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays