Preview

Descartes First Meditation Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1251 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Descartes First Meditation Analysis
In the First Meditation, Descartes goes into depth on reflecting about the number of falsehoods and deceptions that he’s fallen for during his lifetime. This causes him to question everything that he has perceived as true or real, even something as concrete as the senses. It’s here where he attempts to deconstruct all the perceived notions and build a new foundation based on absolute truths, things that cannot be doubted. However, the most polarizing topic, and the one that I shall be arguing for today, is the idea that it is not only God who is the one that has allowed us to be deceived, but in conjuncture with a malicious demon.

Descartes argues that we often have perceptions in life that seem incredibly obvious and unquestionable, things that surely must be real. Yet at times our senses can deceive us. But why would God deceive us if he is the model of perfection? Instilling a fault from a faultless being doesn’t make sense, as doing such would go against him being as impeccable as he is, unless it isn’t god who is behind this curtain of confusion, but instead a deceiver, a cunning demon causing me to question my own judgements.

“So I shall suppose that some malicious, powerful, cunning demon has done all he can to deceive me – rather than this being done by God, who is supremely good and the source of truth.” (Rene Descartes:
…show more content…
However; the most compelling idea of this is that if I were to immerse ourselves into this line of thinking, what types of conclusions could I draw about the world, about myself, and about life in general if everything I think I know and experience is nothing more than a mischievous demon tampering with my mind? If this were to be true, then everything that I know in life would be false, which would call into question, is a life with no real consequences or rewards for my actions, actually a life? Would this not simply be a meaningless

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Throughout Meditation One in The Meditation of the First Philosophy, Descartes reflects on a number of falsehoods he has believed throughout his life. He does this to create a system in order to clarify whether they are true or false, so that he can build a basic structure from which future knowledge can be based. This approach is called Method of Doubt. Doubt is defined as a feeling of uncertainty. Descartes opens Mediation One by stating that if he wants to establish information that is firm and lasting in the sciences, he would have to begin from the earliest foundations from which his current knowledge has been built upon. He establishes that the task includes breaking down the components that make up his general knowledge.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hum112 Assignment 1:Essay

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This surprise is first revealed after three paragraphs of Descartes debating the truth of his own existence between the conscious awake times and the unconscious dream times and the relationship to things in nature. According to Descartes (1636), “In thinking it is necessary to exist” and “that all things which we very clearly and distinctly conceive are true.” It is at that point that his focus turns to describing the proof of existence of God as the creator of all imperfect things.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Phil 101 Questions

    • 4817 Words
    • 15 Pages

    1. Why is it important to Descartes to determine as early as possible whether God exists and is a deceiver?…

    • 4817 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes conclusion on premise 6 about God’s existence argues that the clear and distinct perceptions provide the foundation or basis for the truth of our beliefs and that is so because God, who is not a deceiver would not allow Descartes to be mistaken about that which he clearlyl and distinctly perceives. His notion of clear and distinct perceptions and their truth requires God’s existence.…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes’ arguments for his methods of doubt were things may not be as they seem based on the perception of our senses may be skewed, our dreams may lead us to believe that what we dreamed might be real and that what we know as God may be false or that God may be a demon instead.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This gives an insight into why Descartes relies so heavily on the God in his meditations. It seems he uses God to support his meditations and uses God as a solution to his philosophy of doubt. God is vital as he is the answer to Descartes’ most complex ideas on doubt and enables him to preach God’s ability to relieve us of doubt but further more he want to reveal to us that God is the reason for all matter , for our…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    "Give a detailed account of Descartes ' systematic doubt or methodical doubt in Meditation 1, making it certain that you distinguish between real doubts and so called hypothetical/metaphysical doubts. Then, explain in detail, exactly how Descartes dispels each and every one of these doubts during the course of the subsequent Meditations beginning with the cogito. Do you think that Descartes has been completely successful? Explain."The main goal of Descartes in Meditations on First Philosophy was to find truth behind all of his beliefs in order to build a solid foundation of certainty, and to focus his beliefs strictly on his idea of certainty; essentially to question knowledge. Descartes beliefs are mainly based on the theory that, if someone thinks that they really know something, they must be correct. Descartes meditations bring…

    • 3392 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “ (39). The source of his errors is rooted into the last sentences of this essential paragraph. He argues, “ since the will extends further than the intellect, I do not contain the will within the same boundaries: rather, I also extend to things I do not understand. Because the will is indifferent in regards to such matters, it easily turns away from the true good; and in this way I am deceived and I sin” (39) He doesn’t only apply his ability to exercise free will on matters he understands, but also on matters that he does not understand. His ability to think leads him to think. argue and question many ideas. In some of these cases an opportunity may arise when has to choose a side of the matter. The free will he posses do not tell him the correct side to choose. He rationalizes it into his on his own understanding and then he chooses a side. This can lead him to make an error and be imperfect because the side he might have chosen could be the wrong choice. God gave him the ability to think and choose but God does not tell him the correct choice and this can lead him to…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this outpouring of emotion the author conveys an annoyed tone that exemplifies to the audience why god is not real.Harris ends his article by explaining how much of the world suffering could be attributed to religion. He appeals to the contrasting idea of good and bad by admitting, “If God exists, either He can do nothing to stop the most egregious calamities, or He does not care to. God,therefore, is either impotent or evil.” (Harris n.p.). And, “Of course, people of faith regularlyassure one another that God is not responsible for human suffering. But how else can we understand the claim that God is both omniscient and omnipotent?” (Harris n.p.). He examinesthe good and bad in order to how god is not all powerful like they say because if he was people in this world would not be suffering. In this examination of god the audience is shown how god cannot be all good therefore he is either unworthy or god is fictionNeuroscientist, philosopher, and best-selling author Sam Harris argues about the existence of a god. He appeals to the logic of basic facts proving that there is no evidence showing the existence of a…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes constructs an argument for God’s existence on page 32-34 of his third meditation titled: Concerning God and He Exists. In this paper, I will summarize Descartes’s argument in my own words.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    God is the next doubt that Descartes brings to attention. He says that he is constantly deceived and God must have created him to be subject to this occasional deception. This doubt is quickly dispersed however when Descartes reasons that God is good and therefore would not deceive him because that would be contrary to his goodness.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the Meditations, Descartes successfully establishes methodical doubt about math and all sensory information, however, his answer to the doubt cast by the Evil Demon ploy does not fully relieve the dilemma of skepticism that his intense application of doubt has brought forth. Ultimately, Descartes is unable to satisfactorily answer the Evil Demon doubt because his argument does not prove that God’s existence would not prevent the serious errors in judgment and perception caused by the Evil Demon doubt.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Does God Allow Evil?

    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many people dispute the true intentions of God, himself, since the beginning of mankind. Opposing and concurring arguments can be just as primitive. Regardless of personal perspective on any indefinite theory, it is undeniable that the controversy between good and evil will inevitably exist. Two dominant philosophers discussed in “The Problem of Evil” are Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and David Hume. Both of these authors discuss interesting motives from both sides of the issue: why and why not God should allow evil.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Free Will Defense

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the most persistent challenges to God’s existence is also the root of one of the most asked, but least answerable, questions that we, as human beings, ponder—why is there evil? This dilemma of why the world is filled with evil, anything bad ranging from bullying to natural disasters, has motivated atheists, those who reject God and His existence, to bring forward an argument called “The Problem of Evil”. Due to much debate on the topic, theists, those who believe in God, have tried to resolve the problem of evil by presenting multiple theodicies—attempts to justify or defend God in the face of evil. In this paper, I will present counterarguments to two popular theodicies, the “Free Will Defense” and the “Soul-Making”, in an effort to…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Philosophy Exam 2

    • 1455 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Earnestly, Descartes ponders over the course of Meditation IV how an all-powerful and seemingly benevolent God could allow man to believe errors and falsehoods. In Meditation IV, Descartes compared God to a master craftsman, so wouldn’t it seem that his craft would be without mistake. Undoubtedly, Descartes is befuddled by the concept of sometimes believing in falsehoods although he was created by an infinitely perfect being, isn’t believing in falsehoods supposed to be a bad thing? If that is the case then who is to blame? However, Descartes perceives that it would be impossible for God to deceive him and would neither desire too because God is simply perfect in all ways. God had given a faculty that would not lead man to error as long as it was used correctly, thus it is the fault of man for believing in falsehoods. In my notes, the understanding is summarized as when one chooses to believe a claim that does not have sufficient evidence then one is to blame for rushing to judgment. In a perfect world, it would seem that man should never fall to error because of the faculty given by God, but continuously we give rise to an infinitude of imperfections. Descartes further presses on to understand why God allows falsehoods or flaws innately within man that lead to error; he attributes it to two things: faculty of understanding and faculty of free will. Because we can choose to question, seek answers, believe in what we want to believe, that is the reason for error. Descartes says that he does not question the mysterious ways of God, although he does seem to ponder his actions for these faculties alone testify to the tenacious and insatiable curiosity of man. At the end of Meditation IV, Descartes comes into an understanding about his perceptions since he had discovered the source of falsity and error that for as long as he is diligent of will and restraint within the bounds of his own knowledge, he will never be deceived. I do…

    • 1455 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays