Preview

Deontology vs Utilitarianism

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
379 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Deontology vs Utilitarianism
DEONTOLOGY vs UTILITARIANISM

The theory of deontology is derived from the writings of German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804). Kant stated that a universal law should provide the basis for each act, and that the intention was of more importance than the result. Deontology is a duty-based ethical position, where one 's actions are based on what is ethically correct, regardless of the consequences (Porche, 2004). Deontological theories hold that actions are morally right are those in accordance with certain rules and duties, rights or maxims. Actions can be morally obligatory, allowed, or prohibited and consequences do not matter. In deontology intention is relevant. A person is right in acting certain way only if this person acts for the right reason. Examples of deontological rules are Divine Command Theory, Golden Rule, Natural Law and Rights Theories, Kantian Ethics, The Non-Aggression Principle. Deontological theories hold that an action 's rightness or wrongness depends on its conformity to a certain moral norm, regardless of the consequences for example right vs good. According Motta 's opinion listed on web site www.E-how.com, the differences between deontological and utilitarianism is: "Duty-based ethics are often called deontological and consequentialist ethics are often labeled as utilitarian". The site further explains that deontological pertains to theory of binding responsibility or duty. Such theories are also called "a priori" in that they are based upon knowledge gained prior to experience. No concrete lived-through experience is necessary in order to attain these duties deductively from reason. If in deontology intention is more important than the results, Utilitarianism is a normative ethical theory that places the locus of right and wrong solely on the outcomes or consequences of choosing one action/policy over other actions/policies. As such, it moves beyond the extent of one 's own



References: Porche, D. (2004). Public & community health nursing practice: a population-based approach..Thousand Oaks, Sage Publication Motta, M. (n.d). How to Distinguish Between Duty-based Ethics and Results-oriented Ethics. Retrieved from http://www.ehow.com/how_2180734_between-dutybased-ethics- resultsoriented-ethics.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Eth 501 Module 1

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Everyone has the duty to make the right decision or action. The question with deontological ethics, however, is to whom or what is that duty. Utilitarian ethics have an easier way of determining the choice or decision at hand. What maximizes the most amount of good for the most amount of people? Deontological ethics, however, makes decision independent of consequences for the majority or for one’s self. A deontologist makes a decision because it is right. Also, deontological decisions are found to be moral only if the motivation is moral. If the motivation is not ethical, then the action itself is not ethical regardless of how much good was done in the process of doing that action. (Deontological ethics,…

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    As according to the Merriam-Webster, and Kantian ethics, Deontology is defined as the ethical idea of judging the morality of actions based on their adherence to the rules (Merriam-Webster 2013). In simpler terms, this means that actions are judged on whether or not society, or god, or any predetermined standard believes them to be okay. People must act from duty. For example, a Deontologist, or someone who practices Deontology, from the 1850s would judge slavery to be acceptable (Slavery in the United States 2013). However, a Deontologist today would not consider slavery to be acceptable, or in other words, would consider it morality forbidden. This change in judgment is due to the fact that slavery was considered to be widely acceptable in society in the 1850s but now it is considered widely unacceptable. Another principle of Deontology is that the humanity principle, which states that you…

    • 1233 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eth316 Week 1 Assignment

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Having a full understanding of the similarities and difference between deontological ethics, virtue theory, and utilitarianism begins with by explaining every ethic theory. With deontology ethic theories is that there is a vital importance on the relations between liability and the principles of actions, which human take. The virtue theory is defined as humanizing excellence in life and founding an characteristic of a good person. Utilitarianism is a theory that states that an action is right when that action can create more help for yourself or group than other back up actions.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unlike virtue theory, deontology has a heavy emphasis on duty in action, in adherence to rules. The right action is important here, where upon completion, should bring about the greatest good for all involved. This is somewhat similar to utilitarianism, which does focus on the consequence of the greatest good. However, deontology does not lean on the consequence itself, but more so the principle behind committing the right action. (Boylan, 2009). In turn, the ethics behind deontology is about principle and following rules.…

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Deontology: A nonconsequentialist ethical theory that claims an act is to be evaluated in terms ofits accordance with a specified set of rules. (Mosser, 2013)Virtue Ethics: An ethical theory that focuses on the character of the agent in evaluating moral behavior, in contrast to utilitarianism or deontology; often associated with Aristotle. (Mosser, 2013)Utilitarianism: A consequentialist ethical theory that evaluates moral claims in terms of their outcomes and to the extent these outcomes generate the greatest benefit for the greatest number. (Mosser, 2013)I was at the grocery store checking out in the self checkout lane, and I noticed that A single mom and her 3 kids were having to take out items because she had reached her limit, I noticed…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deontology is defined by the moral obligation of rules and duties. The rules and duties are based on the correctness or principle of an action without regard to consequences. This compares to utilitarianism where the right action is determined by how the action brings about the greatest utility to the group as a whole (Boylan, 2009). Both theories disregard the consequences of that action. Deontology ignores the all consequences, where utilitarianism ignores the consequences to the individual.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism revolves around the concept of “the end justifies the means.” It believes that outcomes as a result of an action have a greater value compared to the latter, the morally right action is the action that produces the most good. It also states that the most ethical thing to do is to take advantage of happiness for the good of the society. This normative theory considers the overall good for all people and not just a single person.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the four deontological systems that we have discussed, I would like to share my thoughts about the Kantian Deontological System. Kantian Ethics is formulated by Immanuel Kant in which he discussed that the nature of duty is based on human reason. For him, human reason, not human nature, can determine what is right and wrong. He also stressed that human desires are not the right measurement for ethics. In addition, Kantian Ethics is known for its two kinds of command or imperative: the hypothetical and categorical imperative. According to Immanuel Kant, hypothetical imperative has conditions and has no value. We do a certain action or decision because we are waiting for something in return or because we are afraid of punishment. On the other…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    QUIZ ON MORAL PHILOSOPHY 1. Which moral theory includes the “interests” of sentient animals (other than humans) into the moral landscape as having rights which do not simply depend on what humans assign them? Aristotle Virtue Ethics. 2. In the video on Deontology, what example does Kant use to illustrate a negative duty (which is perfect) and which cannot be modified to suit the situation.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The deontological/Kantian ethical-decision making philosophy was created by the philosopher Kant. His view on ethical-decision making is about how we morally commit an act or decide on something in the sense of obligation. Kant indicates that ethics is about acting upon our own duty, essentially doing what we ought to do. This philosophy is solely about duty. For example, one can say that “I ought to do my homework”, in this case it would be my duty do my homework in order to get a good grade. Another proposition is, following a maxim when it comes to acting on an action out of oughtness. This maxim one may have is like a policy that one will follow by, when a particular situation or event arises.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another theory is the deontology moral theory. While utilitarianism revolves around the concept of “the end justifies the means”, and deontology works on a concept that “the ends does not justify the means”. Deontology is another moral theory that is dependent on the Scriptures, which may refer to rules, moral laws, and intuition. It is based on the Greek word “deon” and “logos” meaning, “the study of duty”. In other words deontology is based on the idea that we have a duty to do certain things and to not do certain things. For example, if a person refuses to shoot someone because they feel they have a duty to follow the commandment “Thou shalt not kill”. This sentence becomes a rule that the person lives by. Deontologist have strong feelings about the words “right” and “good”. Rights have to do with actions. Good has to do with outcomes. They feel that “right” is the only consideration. Deontologist are people who freely choose to accept certain constraints and who decide…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The word deontology means the science of duty. Immanuel Kant, the philosopher most associated with deontology, defined a person as a reasonable, uncontrolled being who has the capacity to recognize moral laws and the power to decide to act morally or immorally, according to his/her duty (1785/2012). A person’s decisions are made by respecting others; this is our duty as humans. Kant further expanded on duty by distinguishing two types, hypothetical and categorical imperatives. Categorical imperatives are duties that are pure, outright and absolute. There are two questions Kant formulated in relation to categorical imperatives that can be asked when deciding if an action is right or wrong. Can this action be applied to every circumstance as universal law? Is the action being taken a means to an end? If the answer to the first is yes and the second no, then according to Kant, the action is morally right…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The deontological theory contends that right and wrong are determined by the consequences of an action. Deontologists do not negate that consequences are significant but they believe there are more relevant aspects to the moral duty of the action. Deontology mainly focuses on Immanuel Kant and W.D. Ross. Kant based his view on moral principles that define between right and wrong. He also views deontology as an act on any maxim if and only if you can will it into a universal law. Kant introduces that there are rules to determine situations and he also shares that we should never treat people as means to ends. In this way, rational beings should always treat each other as ends in themselves, never as only means. Kant believed that humans have intrinsic worth and we should act to respect the mortality for us and others. He also believed that when humans recognize their worth, they cannot see themselves being used as entities to an end. Kant also shows the importance of not actually doing the right thing, but doing things for the sense of duty for getting moral worth in return. W.D. Ross developed the prima facia obligations. These obligations are obligations that override other obligations. According to Ross, there are seven types of obligations: 1. Duties of fidelity, 2. Duties of reparation, 3. Duties of gratitude, 4. Duties of justice, 5. Duties of beneficence, 6. Duties of…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Deontology is an ethical theory whose name is derived from the Greek word “deon,” meaning duty or obligation. Most ethical theories are concerned with what is right or good, and they often attempt to find this by applying a rule or several rules that seem to fit with outcomes that we most commonly find are "good". Deontology is a non-consequentialist moral theory. While consequentialists, such as a utilitarian, believe the end will always justify the means, a deontologist will assert that the rightness of an action lays in the intent. It is the inherent nature of the act alone that determines its ethical standing. Deontology implies that certain actions are…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe Utilitarianism is much better ethical theory compared to deontology when making an ethical decision because ‘the end justifies the means’ instead of ‘the end does not justify the means’. When making moral decisions utilitarians believe each decision must achieve the greatest amount of good and decreasing the amount of bad that could happen. Deontological ethics says otherwise it tends to follow a strict set of moral rules showing an absolute approach to most decisions. These ethical theories can be said to be complete opposites when compared especially when it comes to using someone as a means to an end, consequences of decisions, and the use of the universal code of ethics.…

    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays

Related Topics