Preview

Deontological and Teleological Ethical Theory

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1667 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Deontological and Teleological Ethical Theory
Teleological Ethics = Consequentialist Ethics
Morality of an act is based on the outcome or consequence of the act
Deontological Ethics = Non - Consequentialist Ethics
Morality of an act is based in the act itself.
Types of Teleological Ethics 1. Utilitarianism – Utilitarian moral theory is classical utilitarianism, 2. Varieties of ancient Greek virtue ethics – Aristotle Ethics is an Example a. The goal of ethics is to explain how one achieves the good life for human beings.
There are only two basic kinds of prescriptive moral theories: teleological theories, deontological theories
TELEOLOGICAL ETHICAL THEORIES
Teleological moral theories locate moral goodness in the consequences of our behavior and not the behavior itself. According to teleological (or consequentialist) moral theory, all rational human actions are teleological in the sense that we reason about the means of achieving certain ends. Moral behavior, therefore, is goal-directed. So from the teleological point of view, human behavior is neither right nor wrong in and of itself. What matters is what might happen as a consequence of those actions in any given context. Thus, it is the contextualized consequences that make our behavior, good or bad, right or wrong.
Many moral theorists would argue that morality requires an analysis of my motives (or intent) that brought about that behavior. However, from a teleological perspective, motives really have nothing to do with the rightness or wrongness of the act. What really matters lies in the potential pains and pleasures associated with the short-term and long-term consequences.
HEDONISM
Teleological moral theories must somehow connect the consequences of human behavior to the foundational moral concepts of good and bad, right and wrong, and moral and immoral. The hallmark of most teleological moral theories is that they identify these moral concepts with pleasure and pain, or happiness and unhappiness. Hence, moral acts are

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    It gives the belief that whatever it takes for us to gain personal happiness and whatever benefits them is moral. For example when two boxers are in a boxing tournament and they are competing for championship and one of the boxers does a “below the belt” blow and somehow it went unnoticed, the boxer became champion even though he cheated. But because he was willing to do whatever it took to win the championship title, a “below the belt” blow was considered moral. When comparing deontological system vs. the teleological ethical system, they are actually the opposite of each other. The teleological ethical system judges the consequences of the act rather than the act itself. It believes that if the action results in what can be considered as a good consequence, than it must be good and that the end result will justify the reason that the act was committed in the first place. What branches from the teleological ethical systems are utilitarianism, ethics of virtue and ethics of care. Utilitarianism is defined as what is considered to be good is based upon the action. If an action outweighs to harm that the action causes, then the action is good.…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethical theories are all different but some have similar views. Ideas change over time and the theories above prove that. The moral rightness of an outcome is best described as utilitarianism. The moral rightness of an action, regardless of the outcome, is best described as duty ethics. These two are opposites because one focuses on the action and one focuses on the outcome only. Duty ethics has two imperative commands that are important and necessary to follow if you want to be rational. Utilitarianism is all about happiness and producing the greatest amount of happiness. Of course, this is not always good because happiness is not everything. Utilitarianism sort of ignores human rights and virtues. Duty ethics is considered too strict for…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    moral action in duty for its own sake, the other in the maximization of human happiness;…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics has been used as a basis of human morals from Greek times to today’s hectic and fast paced society culture; it is based on a number of factors both of a personal and cultural aspect focusing on a people’s conception of right and wrong. Either way philosophers use logic, critical thinking, and reason to find the answers to a wide variety of non-empirical human questions to what is morally right and wrong. Below I have provided information on three ethical concepts of utilitarianism ethics, virtue ethics and deontological ethics.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics refers to reasonable standards of right and wrong that advise what humans should to do regarding benefits to society, obligations, fairness, or specific virtues (Velasquez, Andre, & Shanks, 2010). Utilitarianism, virtue, and deontological are three ethical theories that deal with individual beliefs and actions. Each person possesses ethics and morals but may not know what they are or how they are used in certain situations. Comparing the three theories will help understand where ethics stand in an individual’s life.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Psychological Egoism

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Let’s consider the chapters on Hedonism and the connection between our pursuit of happiness and the consequential behavior that is then elicited; as well as the natural law theory which persuades followers to behave naturally. In both cases these behaviors were motivated by our understanding of what’s moral and what’s immoral. It’s essential to make the distinction between the theories themselves and the resulting behavior that’s performed.. The discussion of our ethical considerations, however, goes “hand in hand” with our behaviors because without one, it’s impractical to consider the other. These ideas are…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mid Term Exam

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare and contrast the two teleological philosophies: egoism and utilitarianism. Discuss the bases that each type uses to evaluate the morality of activities.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout this paper, I will contrast and compare two moral theories in attempt to uncover what one provides a better argument and can be applied as a universal moral code. The two moral theorists Immanuel Kant and J.S Mill have created two distinctly different theories on morality and how to develop a universal moral code. Both theories focus on intentions and consequences. Kant believes that the intentions and reasons of our actions can be measured and defined as morally correct, where as Mill believes that our intentions really play no role in morality, and that we should focus on the consequences and outcomes of our actions to evoke the most happiness for the most people. Even though both philosophers make incredibly different points, each encompasses strong arguments as well as issues with their approach. However, Kant will be successful in articulating a better universal moral theory through the use of his categorical imperative.…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    If we want to fully understand morality we must analyse the meaning of the key moral terms used, what it means, what it does and how it may be verified. Take the word ‘good’; we may describe it in an absolute way, “this is a good essay” or in a relative way, “compared to the previous one, this essay is good”. Or in a utilitarian way, “this essay will get a good result” However none of these uses or descriptions actually tell us what the word good means.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human beings have an innate ethical sense that urges them to make predictable choices. Although most people believe their actions are guided by logic and reason, reason often acts only as a way to justify these choices. Ethics is a learned behavior, a behavior that starts from childhood. Every individual has choices in life. And everyone’s perception of right and wrong may not be the same. This discussion will be based on is ethics natural or learned behavior?…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The philosophy of ethics has been studied and debated for many centuries. While there are varying definitions of ethics, many who study the topic would agree that ethics can be described two ways. First, ethics can be considered to be the standards of right and wrong that outline what a human being ought to and ought not to do. In other words, they are the standards that tell us to be honest and give to others, rather than to lie and steal. Second, ethics can refer to the actual study of ethical standards. The term study can be understood in different ways as well. One can study ethics by simply trying to understand what ethics are. Others can study ethics by digging deeper into what they believe to be right versus wrong. When studying ethics, one will begin to learn about normative ethics. The “Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy” (2009) website explains normative ethics as ethics that involve arriving at moral standards that regulate right or wrong. It explains normative ethics as a type of “proper behavior litmus test.” Three strategies of normative ethics include virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics. These three strategies will be explained in further detail here.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    What is morally right or wrong doesn’t depend on what ideology you believe in, Moral Relativism or Divine Command Theory, but your own individual self-morality. Believing in Divine Command Theory can become a problem when there is doubt of motivation and Moral Relativism can result in morality becoming inconsistent. The standard of consistency requires that “a moral theory should be consistent in the sense that its principles, together with relevant factual information, yield consistent moral verdicts about the morality of actions, persons, and other objects of moral evaluation” (Timmons 271). In this essay I will argue that both Moral Relativism and Divine Command Theory have their flaws and the only way to ‘do the right thing’ is to rely on your own sense of morality.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Deontology is an ethical theory whose name is derived from the Greek word “deon,” meaning duty or obligation. Most ethical theories are concerned with what is right or good, and they often attempt to find this by applying a rule or several rules that seem to fit with outcomes that we most commonly find are "good". Deontology is a non-consequentialist moral theory. While consequentialists, such as a utilitarian, believe the end will always justify the means, a deontologist will assert that the rightness of an action lays in the intent. It is the inherent nature of the act alone that determines its ethical standing. Deontology implies that certain actions are…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This obligation to help others introduces the concept of utilitarianism. In general, this idea requires an individual, or society as a whole, to act in such a way as to promote "the maximization of goodness in society – that is, the greatest goodness for the greatest number" (Pojman 107). Therefore, the person is the focus of happiness. In addition, utilitarianism falls in the category of teleological ethics, which is concerned with the conclusion or the consequences of a particular act, and not the means by which that end result was produced. Using the act of lying as an example, Pojman states, "the act that is right produces the best consequences…the only thing wrong with lying for the teleologist is the bad consequences it produces" (107). It is not the act itself that makes lying bad to the teleologist, but the end result. Normally, t…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    PETER ABELARD ON ETHICS

    • 860 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As an ethicist he developed a theory of moral responsibility which was based on the agent 's intentions (intentionalism) this view that the agent’s intention determines the moral worth of an action. Moral goodness is defined as intending to show love of God and neighbor and being correct in that intention. Abelard lists as the components of behavior (a) mental vice, (b) will or desire, (c) pleasure, (d) voluntariness, (e) consent and intention, and (f) the action or deed itself. All these go in unison; one has a vice, desires that the vice be satisfied, voluntarily consents with the intention of satisfying this desire, and takes pleasure in the successful completion of the bad act.…

    • 860 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays