Read full document

Democritus

Page 1 of 1
Assignment 5
Relate Democritus' ethics and his physics. How can he be concerned with right and wrong behavior when there are only atoms in the void? Compare his ethics to Parmenides' Way of Opinion.
!
Democritus was an atomist, and atomists wanted to explain the world without reasoning. They wanted to figure out the purpose, the prime mover and the final cause, which by todays standards is the more scientific approach to figuring out the universe. Questions should be answered with a mechanistic argument. His theory that everything is composed of atoms, which can not be divided, and that they have been, and always will be in motion.

!
Democritus believed in equality, that be a moral person and lead a happy life, you couldn’t have the maximum of anything, whether it be pleasure or pain. You have to avoid any extremes. Too much of even pleasure can even lead you down an evil path Democritus says. You have to maintain a balance, so if you are having too much fun, he wants you to even it out with a little pain or hardship. How it relates to his physics is that for the universe to be there needs to a space or void. That void, he says has an equal right as reality does because it is what helps it be. It is a vacuum that has infinite space, that moves an infinite amount of atoms, that are small, that they are invisible to the eye, and are eternal. He didn't believe that there was a supernatural being that created the universe, instead insisted that the world came about through because it was necessary. because of the nature of atoms. He thought that nature was like a machine. I think it relates with his ethics, that like with a machine if it is oiled to much or to less it will not work properly.

!
He’s concerned with right and wrong behavior even when only atoms are in the void maybe because if they don’t do what they are destined to do in the world, the world would not exist. Why are the atoms there, if not to make the world. I think that Democritus thinks (I think)...
Assignment 5
Relate Democritus' ethics and his physics. How can he be concerned with right
and wrong behavior when there are only atoms in the void? Compare his ethics
to Parmenides' Way of Opinion.
!Democritus was an atomist, and atomists wanted to explain the world without
reasoning. They wanted to figure out the purpose, the prime mover and the final cause,
which by todays standards is the more scientific approach to figuring out the universe.
Questions should be answered with a mechanistic argument. His theory that everything
is composed of atoms, which can not be divided, and that they have been, and always
will be in motion.
!Democritus believed in equality, that be a moral person and lead a happy life,
you couldn’t have the maximum of anything, whether it be pleasure or pain. You have to
avoid any extremes. Too much of even pleasure can even lead you down an evil path
Democritus says. You have to maintain a balance, so if you are having too much fun, he
wants you to even it out with a little pain or hardship. How it relates to his physics is that
for the universe to be there needs to a space or void. That void, he says has an equal
right as reality does because it is what helps it be. It is a vacuum that has infinite space,
that moves an infinite amount of atoms, that are small, that they are invisible to the eye,
and are eternal. He didn't believe that there was a supernatural being that created the
universe, instead insisted that the world came about through because it was necessary.
because of the nature of atoms. He thought that nature was like a machine. I think it
relates with his ethics, that like with a machine if it is oiled to much or to less it will not
work properly.
!He’s concerned with right and wrong behavior even when only atoms are in the
void maybe because if they don’t do what they are destined to do in the world, the world
would not exist. Why are the atoms there, if not to make the world. I think that
Democritus thinks (I think) everything nature made is made for a reason and atoms are
what make up the universe.
! The main point in Paramenides’ Way of Opinion is that even if something that is
believed to be truth by popular opinion, doesn’t make it the actual truth. For example
Even if everyone one says that if you jump off a bridge you will live doesn’t mean that it
is the truth. Comparing it to Democritus’ ethics, is a little hard to do. Maybe they are
comparable in the fact that Democritus says to be happy with what you have, your truth,
finding what is the truth in your situation,and make the best of it and Way of Opinion
talks about the same, popular opinion’s truth (like gods) is not necessarily the actual
truth, and that you need to find the “truth” that you believe to be true.
!