Preview

Death Penalty Speech

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
737 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Death Penalty Speech
From the execution of a young Maori boy named Wiremu Maketu in 1842, to when Walter Bolton was hung for the poisoning of his wife in 1957. The death penalty was believed to be an effective means of deterring murders in New Zealand. Now think about this, say your brother, sister, parent or friend was recently murdered. The convicted killer is prosecuted and sent to prison. A comfortable two man jail cell, with food, medical care, bedding and all of life’s necessities on call. The thing is, where is your loved one? They're either 6 feet under in a decaying wooden box or sitting atop a mantelpiece in a nicely decorated urn, and the irony is, you and your family are paying for that criminal. Directly through your taxes.
Currently in New Zealand, the average period of incarceration for murder stands for 23 years. Eventually that once savage criminal will walk free on parole after a quarter of their life in a jail cell. So again I ask, where is your loved one? They’re still dead. Who can value a killer’s life at a quarter of the expense of your deceased? Although the death penalty won’t bring them back, it certainly will bring a sense of closure to the still grieving families as opposed to having another killer released back onto the streets.
The question still remains, however. What happens these so called “rehabilitated citizens” that are now free to go about and continue their lives? What actually guarantees you and me the peace of mind that these criminals won’t repeat their crimes once they are released? There are too many accounts of repeat murders from ex-convicts too even risk that statistic. What is the use of enabling danger to have its place in society? Another family torn apart, another friend lost, all at the hands of our flawed judicial system. When someone is humanely executed, the cycle stops there. There is no opportunity for more senseless murder or crime to arise from immuration. And you may be thinking what if an innocent man was wrongly sentenced

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Capital punishment is the ultimate sentence administered by the government for committing dangerous offenses. The word “capital” derives from the Latin word “capitalis,” meaning “of the head.” Original instances of capital punishment included beheading and hanging, leading to the use of word “capital” today. Through history, communities have considered some types of crimes so terrifying that the death penalty has been enacted for them. Over time, changing moralistic values and notions on government authority have limited the number and sorts of crimes considered worthy of death. Many countries have eliminated capital punishment totally, dismissing it as an inhumane reaction to criminal…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Does the government really want to give prisoners a second shot at murder? Government officials would hold that negative responsibility like a burden. We can keep these things under wraps by simply prohibiting parole hearings after 15 years, or even shorter than that time span. Because after 5 years people in prison are usually there for good. It’s too much trauma to handle and it leads to psychotic breakdowns. What happens to the peoples trust if a deranged man or woman is released into the community? Fear will definitely spread and even if a criminal had a sudden change of heart the citizens will drive him crazy enough to do something again.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Mbuba (2012) after a person has been released, and they are labeled as a criminal, they are left with limited choices that results in them reoffending (p.232). Inmates need to learn once again what it is like to be social, they need to learn how to be in an environment where they could go as the please if they are not under parole. This does not mean that incarceration should not be used. In my opinion, incarceration should still be used. For the most violent offenders, they should be placed in maximum security, for other offenders, they can be placed in medium-security or minimum security depending on their charge. The changes that need to be made in the current system is allowing offenders the opportunity to have effective correctional intervention. There should be reentry programs that focus of the three core principles of offenders such as risk, needs, and responsivity. Which is why Listwan, Cullen and Latessa (as cited in Latessa and Holsinger, 2016) report that programs that fail to develop clear goals, plan for relapse, and use effective classification will fail ( 2006, p.…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty has been an ongoing debate on whether it should be allowed or whether it violates our constitutional right. While most developed Western nations have stopped executing the United States continues to execute offenders (Zimring 2004). From 1977 through 2008 1,136 people have been executed, which consisted of people who committed murder (Procon 2010). Those who are in favor of the death penalty believe it is an important tool to help deter crime and it cost less than life imprisonment (Procon 2010). They believe retribution helps console the grieving family and it also ensures that the offender will never be able to commit another heinous crime (Procon 2010). According to Grant (2004) some people believe that some offenders should face the death penalty because of vengeance and retribution for violent crimes. During the…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The human physic is very impressionable and once the sweet taste of freedom is experienced after a long term of confinement. It is beneficial to society and the ex-convict to have the tools necessary to survive the world that once casted them off as criminals. Unfortunately, some doubt the efectviness of rehabilitation like conservatives. The reason for this idea is because to a conservative our society is being too soft on these once ex violators and believes that we are cuddling them instead of smacking them in the face with the harsh reality of the crimes they committed. The key to rehabilitation is mainly preparing convicts of normal life and how to react among normal society. One key step to preparing convicts is job training. With job training it gives people the skills to live a normal life and to understand the real means dedication. Therapy is also another step one has to go through in order to follow social norms. Some criminals are just plain angry, if anger is linked to their criminal behavior than therapy is beneficial in deterring their emotions in committing acts of violence.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cost of the Death Penalty

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Costs and Consequences of the Death Penalty, written by Mark Costanzo, neatly lists reasons for opposition, and abolishment of, the death penalty. Costanzo provides a review of the history of the death penalty, a review of how the death penalty process is working today, questions on whether or not if the death penalty is inhumane and cheaper than life imprisonment. He also questions if the death penalty is fairly applied and the impact, if any, that it has on deterrence. He closely examines the public's support of the death penalty and questions the morality of the death penalty. Finally, Costanzo provides his own resolution and alternative to the death penalty. Each of these items allows the reader an easy, and once again, neat view of how the death penalty can work against out society rather than for it.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death Persuasive Speech

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page

    You are making a decision. The most terrifying, gut-wrenching decision you will ever have to make; death or death? This decision you are hypothetically making stares so many people in the face each day. What would you do if you were told you had only six or less moths to live? On top of knowing you have so little time, you, in those few months, will experience severe pain, discomfort, and emotional distress beyond comprehension. Therefore, I ask you again, death or death?…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I don’t feel anyone should receive a lengthy prison sentence. On the other hand I do believe in the Death Penalty. You’re either a waste to society or we should be doing something to make you more presentable in society. Life without Parole should be off the books as far as I’m concerned. Its cruel and usual treatment. Three violent crimes or two a jay walking, I’m sorry but I haven’t heard of Ted Bundy reoffending. Or even of Mason family members being considered seriously for parole. So how is someone who commits not 1 not 2 but 3 heinous crimes given an opportunity? And the few murderers who were released in the late 80s early 90s to have bought on our tough on criminals actions, would they have ever seen a 3rd? Or was their 2nd always have been life anyway? Psychology and Law Tredoux, Foster, and Alfred…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is always the problem of someone being wrongly convicted. “At least 4.1% of all defendants sentenced to death in the US in the modern era are innocent, according to the first major study to attempt to calculate how often states get it wrong in their wielding of the ultimate punishment”(Pilkington). Even though the number of innocently convicted people is not that high once an innocent man or woman has been executed there is no way to undo what has been done. The criminal justice system is not perfect and they too sometimes make mistakes. “Whether our criminal justice system has executed an innocent man should no longer be an open question. We don't know how often it happens, but we know it has happened. Cameron Todd Willingham's case proves that. As long as our system of justice makes mistakes -- including the ultimate mistake -- we cannot continue executing people” (Scheck). Sometimes people make mistakes but innocent people being convicted and executed for a crime they didn’t commit is a mistake that can be prevented by making sure the death penalty isn’t an option for punishment any more. Innocent people don’t have to worry about this anymore if the death penalty is no longer possible there are also other options of punishment besides…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is a waste of money, time and space. The death penalty simply confuses the community and blurs the line between right and wrong, since you are hypocritically punishing someone for killing another human, by in return killing them also. The death penalty isn’t decreasing the murders so why re-instate it? Imagine the affect on young children when they find out what happens to hazardous criminals, it would ruin the child’s innocence. They death penalty bring nothing but suffering to the family of the criminal, and a negative atmosphere throughout the community. If it were your child on death row wouldn’t you want them to have a second chance? Once again, I state with utmost important, the death penalty should remain as a figure of the past and we should remain civilised and keep our-self and community away from this inhumane act as long as…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my perspective the death penalty does not reach the minds of most criminals because a criminal rarely believes he/she could be caught. They hold a belief that they are intelligent enough to outsmart authorities. There is other whom holds such anger towards certain crimes that they believe death is a rightful punishment, but death does not “undo” a crime they have committed. I think it would be better for a criminal to think and reminisce their conscious. Their death would only put peace in their state of mind and except them from the punishments that prison holds for them. Families harmed by these criminals are sometimes frightened by the thought that they’re persecutor could escape and harm them again, however someone sentenced to life in parole in the united states has never escaped or been released. There is also a possibility that an innocent person could be convicted of a crime they did not commit, even with all our new technology and DNA testing there is always a chance of making a…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First off, the cost of a death penalty court case is tremendous, in comparison to a life sentence case. A Public Defender’s Office in Idaho spent 44 times more time on a death penalty case than a life sentence appeal. Because the time spent on a case directly relates to the cost, giving life sentences instead of the death penalty would be more cost effective for the U.S. government. In addition to this, even people who have done horrible things like murder and treason can contribute to society in a meaningful and positive way. However, society is not able to benefit from these people and may suffer from it. One man, Stanley Tookie Williams, was given a death sentence in 1981 for participation with a brutal gang in which he murdered four people and had two counts of robbery against him. During his time on death row he tried to become a better person. He wrote a series of eight books aimed at children in an attempt to turn them away from gang-violence, an attempt to prevent them from following in his own footsteps. While he filed appeals to get out of his death penalty, he was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize multiple times. Despite all of this, he was eventually executed in 2005. His efforts at directing kids to a better path in life show us that even the worst criminals can change, that even the worst criminals can have a positive impact on our lives. If he had more time before execution, who knows how many more…

    • 1868 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    You might again be thinking that since prison is worse, as I said earlier, then wouldn’t you want them to go to prison so they would suffer more? The answer is no, it is not about getting revenge and getting to see the murderer be tortured so you can be satisfied, it's about honoring the person's death and knowing there is no chance that person will get to harm another human being ever again. There is no point in putting someone in prison for life for them to suffer, the person they killed is gone, gone from their home, gone from their families, gone from this world, and nothing is going to change that. To keep the public safe and to honor the victims death you must simply put an end to all of it, including the criminal.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate for restoration of the death penalty in Australia has been ongoing since the 1985 abolishment of capital punishment in Australia. Following the abolishment of capital punishment, Australia has not seen any rise in the number of homicides and murders, suggesting that execution does not deter criminals. Each time another heinous crime is committed, public outcry reignites the debate on the reintroduction of the death penalty. In Australia today many obstacles are preventing the restoration of the death penalty including the high cost of capital punishment and the history of innocent people being executed however recent political leaders have mentioned that the return of the death penalty could be appropriate. The death penalty was abolished in Australia decades ago but the battle against capital punishment was left incomplete.…

    • 1860 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since 1976 there has been 1, 416 people killed by the death penalty. The death penalty for many people is a good thing, but to others they oppose. I for example, oppose because of my Christian background.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays