English 099
April 24, 2011
The Death Penalty Should
Be Mandatory For People
That Kill Other People
The death penalty is the punishment to a person that does a capital crime or capital offence. This is a topic that has been discussed among many societies across the country. The judicial system uses the death penalty to dissuade people from horrible crimes. The death penalty should be mandatory for people that kill people because it gives a person to revenges his or her death legally and it makes society feels safe. This is why the death penalty should be mandatory for people who kill other people. People go through a time in their life when they have a loved one murdered in a violent crime. It is not fair for a person to have a friend or family member killed by another person and they get away with it. This is why people who kill other people should get the death penalty. Even though death penalty trials are long, it will give the person some closure in their life knowing that the killer of their loved one is also dead and will never hurt anyone ever again. This is just a way for people to get revenge on another person who killed their loved one legally. Having the death penalty mandatory for people who kill other people makes others in societies feel safe. People would die to a day to day basis if the death penalty wasn’t mandatory for those who kill other people. Any giving day a person can get murdered for whatever reason. With the death penalty in effect, it slows the crime rate down and gives people an opportunity to think before they commit a murder crime. They would know that if they kill someone, they might as well end their own life because there death is around the corner.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Some people might agree with the death penalty. Families get devastated when someone they love and care about has died. Its different when that person they care so much about has been murdered or killed. People tend to hate that person and have the urge to do just about anything to them in order for them to suffer, which causes us to take, revenge on them. This matter has lead to the death penalty. This is a punishment that slowly kills the man or woman that has committed the crime. Why should we have pity on those who choose to kill? If they felt powerful enough to kill, then we should be able to do the same to them. Whatever their reason is that they choose to kill they should be punished someway, somehow.…
- 288 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The death penalty is an extremely vital way of the criminal justice system. The punishment of death can help decrease crime rates. Also, this way of death can lessen the amount of criminals and give families closure. It gives closure because, the families now know that this person will never be able to hurt them or anyone else ever again. The death penalty is a very good way to end many troubles within the U.S.…
- 849 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The death penalty is set in place to punish individuals for the most violent crimes. Its purpose to keep the death penalty legal was to deter people from doing these horrible crimes. That attempt has failed terribly. According to a report conducted by the National Research Council, it was said that we could not depend on the death penalty to deter the effect of murder rates. “Claiming that the death penalty has a deterrent effect on murder rates are fundamentally flawed and should not be used when making policy decisions” (Radelet & Locock, 2012).…
- 679 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
For instance, it is unfair to the criminals in which the evidence against them is weak and in which it was an accident. Executing a person who could possibly be innocent is morally wrong and inhumane. I believe that for the criminals to die in such a public and painful way is cruel and unusual. It is not an effective way of handing out justice. The death penalty can also keep the victim’s families stuck in an angry stage of grief. Moreover, the death penalty might bring the opposite of what survivors of crime most need; accountability, healing and closure. Those criminals have family and loved ones too. Some of them even have a wife and children, why should they suffer by seeing or knowing that their loved one is being sentenced to death?…
- 576 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The purpose of the death penalty is to allow states the right to punish criminals with the highest possible punishment, death. People argue that it is morally wrong for the death penalty to exist, because it allows people to “play God.” Others believe that it helps protect our country from criminals and save lives. Due to this controversy, the death penalty has became a major source of debate in the United States.…
- 603 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
It provides a punishment and deterrent for someone who's already sentenced to life in prison.…
- 880 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The mother of a teenager killed during a shooting rampage at a Chuck E. Cheese restaurant in Aurora in 1993 is begging the governor to let convicted killer Nathan Dunlap die. "Sit back, make no decision, allow the one that 12 people made after listening to all the evidence 17 years ago stand," said Sandi Rogers in a statement sent to Gov. John Hickenlooper. Sandi 's son, Ben Grant, was 17 years old when he was shot and killed with his co-workers. Dunlap had been fired from the restaurant before he came back and shot five people at closing time. Four died, one survived. Ben had only worked at the restaurant for three weeks before the shooting. Sandi said Ben didn 't even know Dunlap. "He 'd never met the guy, he 'd never even seen the guy before," Sandi said back in 1993. Ben 's family and friends said he was a bright, strong, funny young man. "He never got to get married, and have children, he never got to see the world," Sandi said. The sole survivor of a mass shooting in 1993 is tired of talking about the man who changed his life forever. “Every time I have to speak on this, it re-opens wounds,” said Bobby Stephens. Stephens was 20 at the time of the shooting. He was picking up some extra hours at the Chuck E. Cheese restaurant where he worked when gunman Nathan Dunlap came in to rob the store. Dunlap shot and killed Sylvia Crowell, 19; Ben Grant, 17; Colleen O’Connor, 17; and Margaret Kohlberg, 50. Dunlap also shot Bobby Stephens in the face, but didn’t kill him. Stephens lay wounded and bleeding until the robbery was over. Dunlap was convicted and sentenced to death for his crimes. Now, 20 years later, Dunlap learned he will live at least a while longer. Gov. John Hickenlooper announced on May 22, 2013 he’s granting a temporary reprieve of Dunlap’s execution. Capital punishment, also dubbed the “death penalty” is the premeditated and planned taking of a human life by a government in a response to a crime committed by that legally…
- 1453 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Let me begin with money issues that comes along with death penalty also known as capital punishment. Death penalty is quite costly. From 1090’s government spent shocking 2.3 billion dollars on pre-trials, trials, appeal, and jury selection of capital punishment cases. Article by Katherine Baicker titled…
- 200 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The death penalty is an age-old punishment where a person is put to death for certain serious crimes such as murder. This punishment is intended to make potential murderers think twice before killing someone out of fear of losing their own life. Personally, I agree with the death penalty because, for a civilized society, preventing murder should be a priority. The death penalty is the most severe punishment available, as it takes a person’s life away, and in addition to serving as punishment, it also serves as a means of preventing the criminal from committing further crime. This punishment, in name alone, is an indicator of just how detrimental the individual’s crime really was.…
- 1227 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Roy Brown is a conservative who believes in individual rights and the right to life. He believes there is no deeper violation of a citizen’s right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness than the government killing them when they’re actually innocent. With the use of the death penalty, mistakes are highly inescapable (Brown 1).…
- 370 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
It is necessary not only exercise regularly but also eat healthy foods to stay in good physical condition.…
- 489 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Capital punishment or the death penalty is a legal process whereby a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for a crime. The judicial decree that someone be punished in this manner is a death sentence, while the actual process of killing the person is an execution. Crimes that can result in a death penalty are known as capital crimes or capital offences. The term capital originates from the Latin capitalis, literally "regarding the head" (referring to execution by beheading).…
- 666 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The death penalty is the punishment of execution “given” to someone legally convicted of a capital crime which is why term is also called capital punishment. The death penalty is legal in 31 states with 19 left not legalized. There are many pros and cons that go hand in hand when dealing with this delicate subject. When taking those into consideration you may decide on whether you support or are against the death penalty. To support the death penalty would…
- 270 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Proponents of the death penalty say it is an important tool for preserving law and order, deters crime, and costs less than life imprisonment. They argue that retribution or "an eye for an eye" honors the victim, helps console grieving families, and ensures that the perpetrators of heinous crimes never have an opportunity to cause future tragedy.…
- 4827 Words
- 20 Pages
Powerful Essays -
“Should the Death Penalty be Banned as a Form of Punishment.” Balance Politics. N.p., 12…
- 842 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays