CJ Corrections 127
Extra Credit Paper
The death penalty or capital punishment is a concern that has ignited debates and apprehension in today’s society. Capital punishments goal is to come to a verdict of fatality by execution, for a crime one has committed. In order to receive the death penalty, an individual needs to commit certain types of crimes known as capital crimes. Capital crimes include disloyalty, lying under oath, kidnapping, rape, terrorism and assassination. The United States can permit the criminal to have a level of forgiveness by allowing the criminal to decide further techniques. Although an immense majority is beside the death penalty, I believe it is unfair and unjust manner when one is being held to a death penalty. I believe you shouldn’t kill a life as a punishment but let the criminal serve the rest of their life in jail especially because some people who are held to a death penalty are actually innocent and not the correct criminal. A society that respects a life should not have to be put on a death penalty. Citizens who are in support of the death penalty are in disparity with resolutions to put an end to this wrongful manner. One might not even think to use other solutions such as life imprisonment or parole. In Furman v Georgia in 1972, most people at the time thought that there would never again be an execution in the United States but they were wrong. In 1976, in Gregg v. Georgia, a new argument arose that new capital-sentencing methods would be that they had gladly diminished the predicament of impulsive obligation of death. Now days, in the death penalty segment of experiments, jurors are to make detailed findings relating to the occurrence or deficiency of justifying and infuriating the cause involved in ones crime.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document