Preview

David Hume Evidence

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
347 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
David Hume Evidence
According to David Hume, “A wise man, therefore, proportions his belief to the evidence.” In order to believe in something there must be a solid amount of evidence to substantiate the knowledge or the belief. Evidence is in this case, is defined as something that is presented in support of an assertion. Though it is important to note that the support that an evidence provides could be either strong or weak. As for something to be considered a ‘strong’ form of evidence, it must be provided with anything that links it towards direct proof. Different areas of knowledge require different forms of evidence that would lead to prove the belief. By using two areas of knowledge as an example in this essay, I will discuss the extent of evidence needed

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    To be able to properly analyze these claims, however, the definitions of an expert and a pure fact must be established. An expert will be defined as someone who is trained or selected to fulfil a particular role. While this definition may be flexible, it encompasses all experts that will be discussed, namely historians, lawyers, and jurors. In the context of this essay, evidence is defined as an undisputable fact which allows for conclusions to be drawn which are disputable.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Powerful Ideas, An Introduction to Philosophy, aesthetics means "coming from the senses" which is a derivitive of the Greek word, aisthetikos (241). David Hume's believed that emotions are significant in both aesthetics and ethics. In addition, he stated that aesthetics involves both contemplation and judgment. He strongly believes that not everyone is suitable or qualify to judge art.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his article “The Ethics of Belief (Clifford, 1877) W.K. Clifford sought to argue that “it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence” (as cited on p190). The aim of this essay is to establish whether indeed this view offered by Clifford, when considering religious faith, is convincing. In order to do this I will consider the arguments that Clifford put forward, including that which to believe anything based upon insufficient evidence always does harm and so is wrong. Such a statement is in direct opposition to those religious believers who regard their blind faith as a virtue and for whom evidence is something that is unnecessary in order to believe. Along with discussing Clifford I will detail the responses given by James who disagreed with Clifford and in response attacked his views within his own paper “The Will to Believe”. James believed instead that it is more important to achieve truth than to avoid error. Both men, in my opinion, offer strong and persuasive arguments however I do not believe that either stands without criticism, therefore throughout I will offer my own views on the foundations of their arguments, which I hope will establish, that although many of Clifford’s points are valid in particular and specific circumstances they do not offer, as proposed, a convincing view of religious faith.…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    LBST 300

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Please note: The term “specific evidence” means that when you refer to evidence you use the names of authors, names of historical persons, names of characters, titles of books, articles, poems by named authors, works of sculpture, names of paintings and/or rough dates of historical events. Essays that make a claim and then use evidence to persuade the reader of your viewpoint will score higher than essays with generalities.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    sample

    • 1972 Words
    • 9 Pages

    • All major assertions in the essay are supported by at least one piece of relevant evidence.…

    • 1972 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Hume puts forward two separate but very closely related arguments against miracles. Hume argues that the probability of miracles actually happening is so low that is irrational and illogical to believe that miracles do occur. Hume is an empiricist, meaning that he emphasises experience and observations of the world as the way of learning new things.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Back in Hume’s time, there were mainly three schools of thought regarding the nature of morality. This debate was initiated by Thomas Hobbes’ view that moral obligations and duties came from self-regarding motives. In response to Thomas Hobbes’ argument, there are two schools of thought, namely rationalism and sentimentalism. Rationalists such as Samuel Clarke argued that morality could be explained by pure reason , and acting morally is just the same as acting rationally. Hume is on the side of the sentimentalists, as he rejects reason as the basis of morality . Hume argues, rather, that it is our moral sentiments that serve as the basis of moral approvals and disapprovals . In Hume’s picture, each action produces certain feelings in the recipients, be it pain or pleasure, and it is through sympathizing with the recipients which we have an impression of the resulting pain or pleasure in the recipients, and thus approve of or disapprove of the active person’s character trait which led to the action.…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Midterm

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Evidentialism holds four logical possibilities in an attempt to justify their beliefs. There is historical evidence, negative apologetics, minimal evidence, and the Holy Spirit.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an effort to establish boundaries for the use of faith in argument, Locke offers descriptions of faith and reason as well as their proper usage. Although Locke believes both can be used to acquire knowledge it’s no secret that he places a strong preference on reason. So much so, that Locke regards all knowledge gained through faith alone as unreliable unless validated by reason.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “The Ethics of Belief” written by W.K. Clifford. Explains the idea of belief and moral righteousness by coming up with the conclusion that it is morally incorrect to believe in a claim with insufficient evidence or to create a claim without sufficient evidence. Clifford brings about various analogies that prove his claim to be true such as the ship-owner and the religious group on the island. Although these ideas helped set out the theory efficiently, William James essay “The Will to Believe” believes in the opposite by stating that anyone can believe in anything without the sufficient evidence provided for a specific claim. James’s, the essay provides counterexamples to Clifford’s work as well as provides strong examples and positions to help…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion we are introduced to three characters that serve the purpose to debate God and his nature, more specifically, what can mankind infer about God and his nature. The three characters; Demea, Philo, and Cleanthes all engage in a debate concerning this question and they all serve the purpose of supporting their views on the subject. It is the "argument from design" put forth by Cleanthes that is the focal point of the discussion, and it is Demea and Philo who attempt to discredit it.…

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Having the difference between one, having a reason to think a certain argument is true, or two, having a reason to persuade belief in that argument, taking step by step to create belief in an unquestionable argument that could be the logical thing to do, even if the argument shorts enough evidential assistance. The advantage of trusting an argument can be a reason it could take priority over the evidential strong point that’s liked by an…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume defined miracles as a “violation of the laws of nature” and consequently rejected their occurrence as both improbable and impractical. This view has been supported by modern scientists and philosophers such as Atkins, Dawkins and Wiles to a certain extent. However Aquinas, Tillich and Holland and Swinburne to a certain extent reject Hume’s reasons, instead arguing that miracles have a divine cause and that Hume’s arguments are weak. This essay will argue that Hume’s reasons for rejecting miracles are not valid and in doing so consider his two main arguments; lack of probability and Hume’s practical argument.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    David Hume's Miracle

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Given the third scenario, according to Hume a marvel is the occurrence of an event that is unlikely but is very possible. For instance, being struck by lightning, or a person who had no prior health issue suddenly dying of a Heart attack. A miracle is an event that based on the laws of nature is impossible. For instance, walking on water, or a corpse coming back to life. On page 579 of Hume’s Enquiry concerning Human understanding Hume states, “Nothing is esteemed a miracle if it happened in the common course of nature. It is no miracle that a man, seemingly in good health, should die suddenly, because such a kind of death, though more unusual than any other, has yet been frequently observed in any age or country. There must, therefore, be a uniform experience against every miraculous event; otherwise the event would not merit that appellation.” In the end, there is no testimony that is sufficient to establish a miracle, unless that testimony is false.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Claims require evidence, or else they are disregarded, but to what extent? Evidence is a fact or a piece of information that portrays the validity of a belief or proposition. For example, in science, you cannot claim a theory if it is not backed up with supportive evidence. However in matters like the reason of existence or religious beliefs, to what extent should evidence be provided? In Hitchens quote, he claims that if one makes a statement without providing evidences to back it up, the claim can quite possibly be disregarded without the need to even provide evidences to deem it untrue.…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays