Preview

Daughter of Time

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
712 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Daughter of Time
The Gifts of Investigation Throughout history there have been various rumors that King Richard III murdered his two nephews known as the princes of the tower. When Detective Alan Grant received a portrait of Richard Plantagenet, his desire to solve the mystery was peaked. As Grant investigates the allegations against Plantagenet, an abundance of information was recovered. Alan Grant’s ability to make wise selections, view a variety of perspectives, and thoroughly analyze the information allowed him to solve the mystery. Alan Grant discovers and receives a plethora of information during his investigation. He begins his investigation by requesting information from everyone that he came in contact with about the princes of the tower and King Richard III. Grant was informed several times that the princes were smothered with a pillow. During his search, he receives information from several resources such as textbooks from the “Amazon” and historical accounts, he noticed many inconsistencies. For example, he learned that More was only five years when Richard III ascended to the throne and eight years old when Richard III died, therefore his historical account had to be hearsay information. However, Grant regarded information by Miss Ellis and evidence that was corroborated by several witnesses. As Grant reviewed the perspectives of his sources, he came to notice that the bias of the source deeply affected the information. Detective Alan Grant’s ability to determine which information was reliable and unreliable aided him in the process of solving this mystery. While Grant reviews his sources’ accounts, he was able to see through their eyes. In this novel, Alan Grant views the perspectives of Cicely Neville, Richard III, and King Henry VII. As Grant reads the account of Cicely, he learns more about Richard’s personality. The detective learned that “In Richard’s hero-worshipping eyes, everything Edward did had always been right” (60) and Richard deeply cherished


Cited: Tey, Josephine. The Daughter of Time. New York City: Simon & Schuster New York, 1995. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This extract from the Handbook to the Maude Roll is regarding the Yorkist overthrow of the last Lancastrian King. The Canterbury roll, henceforth referred to as the Roll, is written between 1429 and 1433. This is during the reign of the Lancastrian King Henry V. A Yorkist scribe writes our extract at a later date. Shirota identifies this later date as sometime after 1460, but most likely after 1461 because Richard III is identified as Duke of Gloucester. Our extract fits in to the wider context of the Roll in a many ways. Our extract is the justification for the deposition of Henry VI by Edward IV, and is one of many depositions featured throughout the Roll. One of the earliest depositions featured in detail is that of Archigallus, a British King, who is deposed for his violent tyrannical ways. Archigallus is eventually restored for changing his ways and becomes a just king. We can pare our extract with another section of the Roll. There is an earlier extract that talks of Henry Iv, when he was still Henry of Darby, imprisoning Richard II and how he became…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    sure that the bones actually belong to King Richard. Who is to make the decision that the bones are truly his though? Without all of the evidence supporting positive, who is to know?…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wormald consistently and effectively uses evidence from both contemporary and modern sources to support her arguments throughout the article. Her evidence is largely used critically, with evaluation of source material appearing in either the main body of the text or in the footnotes. Consequently, this evaluation of evidence provides for a stronger and more convincing argument by demonstrating the reliability of her sources. Wormald is also able to acknowledge flaws in her evidence, but successfully justifies the use of flawed evidence by arguing for its importance, and demonstrating how it can still support her arguments, such as the vengeful writings of Anthony Welton. It is unclear, however, exactly how far the evidence may be extrapolated to the wider British population, as much of the evidence is taken from upper class and educated individuals in personal contact with the king.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mysteries and supernatural events have fascinated humanity for centuries. One of those mysteries was” Jack the Ripper” who terrorized London in 1888 and even the whole world.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Go Between Quotes

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In his novel, the author takes us on a momentous journey which sees the protagonist, a naive young boy, Leo Colston; lose his childhood innocence as a result of his involvement in a forbidden love affair between the sister of his aristocratic friend and a farmer on the estate they manage. The forthcoming tragedies wholly depend on the social constraints of those days. This setting is therefore of great significance to the enjoyment of the novel. As the story continues, Leo becomes drawn deeper and deeper into their dangerous game of dishonesty and desire, until his role brings him to a shocking and premature revelation awakening him into the secrets of the adult world and the evocation of the boundaries of Edwardian society.…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In these particular lines of act 3 scene 5 from Richard III by William Shakespeare, Richard orders Buckingham to spread rumours around Guildhall about the deceased King Edward. His intention is to convince the public that he is the rightful heir to the throne of England. There are four rumours that Richard tries to spread, including the illegitimacy of the princes, Edward’s wrongful murder of an innocent man, the unfaithfulness of the late king, and the incident that Edward himself is not of royal blood. In order to secure his position as next in line for the crown, Richard uses these lies to separate and hide the children of Edward and Clarence. Richard uses his deceiving public mask and clever manipulation, to acquire more power. By twisting around the actions of his brother’s corrupted ways, he exploits others, such as the general public and Buckingham. Appearances are not reality.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The activities of the king and the duke show us as much about the victims of fraud as it does about the perpetrators. Discuss, making close reference to the text. Include a detailed discussion of one of these characters' scams.…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Dickson Carr lived a fortunate life, attending the distinguished Hill School, eventually studying abroad at Haverford College. His privileged approach to education led him down a successful career path within the literary world. Due to the prosperity of his works, John Dickson Carr was deemed the “master” of lock-room mysteries. From a young age, John Dickson Carr was a passionate writer. By fifteen, he has his own column in the local newspaper. His interests included clocks castles, armor, legends, and fortune, all elements that were worked into his compositions. Despite living in a quaint coal mining town, John Dickson Carr’s life was not a “rags-to-riches” Cinderella story.…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    His loss to France really put a big blemish on his record. He is also dismissed as an almost pathetically led king who lacked the nous in political judgment. Edward IV, on the other hand, is described as a decent enough ruler who grew prematurely aged by drink and debauch and opened the way for usurpation for the malevolent Richard III. On the controversial issue regarding Richard III’s wickedness, Norwich disagrees with those stating that he was a much-maligned emperor, stating that he was a ruler devoid of principle and conscience and would do anything to satisfy his political ambitions[CITATION Mic002 \p np \l 1033 ]. Norwich further alludes that there is little doubt in Richard III’s role in the murder of Edward V, his 12-year-old brother and the rightful heir to his…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Most of what you think you know about Camelot, Guinevere and Lancelot and the evil sorceress known as Morgan le Fay is nothing but lies.”1 For centuries, men and women across the globe have been enveloped in a tale, which, regrettably, is not true. King Arthur, or rather, Arthur Pendragon, was for many years accepted to be the mythical ruler of 5th and 6th century Britain. The tale of a boy who, at the young of age of fifteen, became the king of the Britons began in the 12th century and has since been altered to suit contemporary audiences’ expectations and desires. There have been occasions in history when the extent to which people have come…

    • 2549 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Edwin Drood

    • 3781 Words
    • 16 Pages

    One of the most famous Dickens's novels, The Mystery of Edwin Drood offers a lot of themes which could be discussed. One of them which is probably the most interesting is the doubleness of character John Jasper. It is probably the most interesting because John Jasper is one of the main characters. Although according to the title of the novel readers expect Edwin to be the main character, the story focuses on Jasper who is at the beginning presented as positive, Edwin's uncle who supports him and helps him. Towards the end of the novel readers have reasons to believe that Jasper himself is Edwin Drood's murderer. The novel has remained unfinished so no one will ever find out who was supposed to be a murderer. This fact makes the story more interesting and keeps readers' interest. John Jasper reveals himself as a very complex character who joins two different and in a way opposite characters. There is the impression that he embodies at least two completely different persons each of whom is complex enough to be discussed. There are also some suggestions by the critics that Jasper could be the description of the author's person – Charles Dickens himself. Different suggestions will be presented and discussed further in this work.…

    • 3781 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Does King Arthur Exist

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The famous legend of King Arthur and his knights of the Round Table is arguably one of the most highly acclaimed themes in British literature and history. Although the Arthurian legends, full of magic and heroism, seem to be far-fetched and a complete fantasy, evidence to prove the existence of the so-called “King Arthur” actually does exist, just not in great numbers. The historical foundation surrounding King Arthur is not enough to validate that he actually existed, yet it still leaves historians dubious that it is all a fantasy.…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Princes in the Tower

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of England 's greatest scandals was the disappearance and murder of two princes in 1483. The children of King Edward IV, Edward V and Richard, Duke of York were allegedly "imprisoned" shortly after his death. King Edward 's brother, Richard, Duke of Gloucester, secretly wanted the throne for himself. He would 've gone to extremes to make sure it happened. Yet, there is still great debate over him actually murdering his nephews. The Princes in the Tower focuses on the life of the two princes, how Richard III took over, and the death of the two boys.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I would worry not of it until after my walk. I returned to the stairwell and after lighting a candelabra I climbed the cold stone steps toward the abbey roof. Atop the stairwell I discovered that the doorway onto the roof had been jammed with small wood splints and the hinges pasted with glue. I had now begun to ponder the equivocal nature of both the staff and of Cousin Henry’s death. How could Henry have had stiffened the doorway when it was so obviously sealed from inside? With the base of the candelabra, I smashed against the hinges until eventually they broke away from the frame. The door crashed to the gravel and stone rooftop and I promptly stepped outside.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He is driven only by his own will. This will is simply to have unlimited power – Richard wants to become king, and for this, he is able to do anything, even when it comes to killing. And he kills a lot: there is quite a high number of people before him who would become king if the current one dies, so he has to eliminate each and every of them to make sure that the crown finally lands on his head. And he does a great job: he is far the cleverest person in the play: he plans each and every step one by one, and successfully carries his plan out afterwards. He doesn’t realize, however, that he is just another card in the hands of history. At that time, England, and especially the ruling family of England was rotten. Deep down in corruption, hypocrisy, there is not a single character that we could feel sorry for – and Richard is the one who makes order, cleans the scum, before a new order can come. That’s why, when he finally becomes the King of England, he is lost. He has played so many roles, that he just can’t switch back to being himself. Actually there never has been a Richard himself as he always played roles, acted, and disguised everybody. He is the cleverest of all, but he has a lack of conscience. A king has to represent the whole country with his strong identity, and Richard does not have an identity at…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays