Cu In Brass Lab Report
TA Grading Rubric for THER 357 – Spec. Determ. of Cu in Brass
Student Version
A score sheet will be used to grade each formal lab report. Use the questions for each section as a guideline when evaluating a student’s work for the various sections of the lab report.
Title: Must include: Student’s name, Partner’s Name, TA’s Name, Date, Name of Experiment, Course and Section Number.
Purpose:
Did the student copy the purpose from the experiment (poor) or write something in his/her own words (satisfactory)? Were two or more purposes given (good)? Did the student show comprehension of how this technique is used industrially (very good)?
Procedure:
Are all of the materials and chemicals listed (satisfactory)? Are there separate lists for chemicals …show more content…
Is the consequence of the error discussed (very good)? Does he/she understand the difference between precision and accuracy (very good)? Does he/she understand that the computer is being used as a recording and graphing device (good) and the quality of the results is dependent on their technique (very good)?
Post-lab questions
The post-lab questions listed at the end of the experiment are to be addressed and discussed in the discussion or error section. They are NOT to be answered, as is normally done, as a list of questions. Even if all of the answers are correct, do not give a score higher than satisfactory for that section if this is how they answered the questions.
Conclusion:
Is the purpose of the experiment addressed (good) and briefly answered (very good)? Are any aberrations mentioned (very good)? Are the results of the analysis stated (good)? Is it clear why this technique is so important industrially (good)? Are the new techniques addressed (good)? Is only the %Cu listed (satisfactory)? Was improvement in technique addressed too (good)?
References:
Did the student cite only the lab manual (satisfactory)? Were other references cited (good to very good)?
Student Version
A score sheet will be used to grade each formal lab report. Use the questions for each section as a guideline when evaluating a student’s work for the various sections of the lab report.
Title: Must include: Student’s name, Partner’s Name, TA’s Name, Date, Name of Experiment, Course and Section Number.
Purpose:
Did the student copy the purpose from the experiment (poor) or write something in his/her own words (satisfactory)? Were two or more purposes given (good)? Did the student show comprehension of how this technique is used industrially (very good)?
Procedure:
Are all of the materials and chemicals listed (satisfactory)? Are there separate lists for chemicals …show more content…
Is the consequence of the error discussed (very good)? Does he/she understand the difference between precision and accuracy (very good)? Does he/she understand that the computer is being used as a recording and graphing device (good) and the quality of the results is dependent on their technique (very good)?
Post-lab questions
The post-lab questions listed at the end of the experiment are to be addressed and discussed in the discussion or error section. They are NOT to be answered, as is normally done, as a list of questions. Even if all of the answers are correct, do not give a score higher than satisfactory for that section if this is how they answered the questions.
Conclusion:
Is the purpose of the experiment addressed (good) and briefly answered (very good)? Are any aberrations mentioned (very good)? Are the results of the analysis stated (good)? Is it clear why this technique is so important industrially (good)? Are the new techniques addressed (good)? Is only the %Cu listed (satisfactory)? Was improvement in technique addressed too (good)?
References:
Did the student cite only the lab manual (satisfactory)? Were other references cited (good to very good)?