Having the will and courage to overcome a loss of a relative is something extraordinarily tough to do. James Jarvis portrayed this courage, but at an even deeper level because it was his own son that died. His son, Arthur Jarvis, was killed by Absalom Kumalo, Stephen Kumalo’s son. James Jarvis has the courage to not only overcome the death of his son, but forgive to the Kumalo family and form a resilient friendship with them. By having this courage he “understands” what he “did not understand” before about the natives and is awarded with peace. (Alan Paton 214) …show more content…
He had the courage risk his reputation by profoundly aiding the native’s reconstruction of a “dirty old wood-and-iron” church. (Paton 174) James Jarvis dropped his blind “anger” that he held with the natives and did not care of the fact that it was in the middle of the Apartheid or how other wealthy land owners would think of him for these kind deeds. (Paton 214) Having the courage to do kind deeds for the natives even though he had been taught a discriminatory nature proves his courageous advantage over Stephen