Preview

Critically Assess Marx's Theory of Class and Stratification.

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1546 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Critically Assess Marx's Theory of Class and Stratification.
Marx class theory derived from his belief that class divisions are not found in all forms of society; classes are a creation of history. For Marx, classes are defined and structured by firstly, who owns or has property and means of production and who does the work in the production process, secondly the social relationships included in work and labour, and thirdly who produces and who rules the surplus human social labour can produce. All of these aspects of Marx class theory will be further explored in this essay.

Marx believed that class divisions are not found in all societies, classes are a creation of history. The earliest and smallest societies (tribal and primitive) were classless. It is universally true that all human beings depend on the quest of meeting their basic needs – food, water, shelter and clothing. In these primitive societies, the working day was taken up with required labour in order to meet society’s basic needs and forces of production were distributed equally amongst the community. But when basic needs are met, this leads to man’s creation of new needs, as humans are forever dissatisfied animals. Marx defines human beings as producers (Callinicos, A, p.98, 1996). Humans seek to transform nature to enable them to meet their needs and do this through two different mode of production. The first ‘forces of production’ which depends on what Marx calls the ‘labour process’.
‘‘Labour is first of all a process between man and nature, a process by which man, though his own actions, mediates, regulates and controls the metabolism between himself and nature’’ (C I 283).
The relations of production is the social aspect, which involves the property rights of the productive forces, it is what distinguishes the modes of production for one another. Improvements in the labour force are determined by if man is able to produce the same amount of things but with less human labour. By been able to produce more effectively, therefore meant man gains more

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Marx believed that class conflict derives legal change. To better grasp this he created hos social theory: “classical Marxian model.”…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Week 1 Sociology Notes

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Karl Marx’s class conflict theory states that the bourgeoisie (or the capitalists) are locked in conflict with the proletariat (the exploited workers). Marx believed that this conflict could only end when the working class united and violently broke free of the “bondage”. Once this happens, society will be classless and people will work according to their abilities, while receiving goods and services according to their needs. Although Marxism does propose revolution, it should not be confused with communism.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society there is a class divide between the wealthiest one percent of the population and the poorer ninety-nine percent. Therefore, Marx believes this economic division is a result of the law reflecting the interests of the dominant class, rather than the general interests of…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The class was divided into two, the bourgeoisie (capitalist) and proletariat (working class) where they exist on what status they have.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Karl Marx’s model helps to explain the industrial capitalism by first generalizing history leading up to today’s current society as being created due to the history of class struggles. Rather than the more traditional complex hierarchy system, Marx describes society as being split into two classes, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. He described these two classes in terms of binary oppositions, with one class having the absolute power, and the other being oppressed by that power. The bourgeoisie class was said to be the oppressor, which Marx defined as the social class that owns the means of production and the employers of wage labor in a capitalist society. Marx views the class as emerging from the wealthy urban classes in pre and early capitalist societies. They resulted when the demand for a larger scale and efficient means of production led to the division of labor and the arrival of industrialization. The proletariat class was said to be the class which was being oppressed by the bourgeoisie class. According to Marx they were the workforce of bourgeois enterprise and were a class of laborers which were able to make a living only as long as they…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    As one of the major systems of stratification, class is based on ownership of resources and on the type of work that people do. Marx and Webber acknowledged social class as a determinant of social inequality and social change. For Marx, people’s wealth determines their class position. The stratification of society into different social groups results in disparity in income and wealth and uneven access to available goods and services. People with high income or wealth have more opportunity to control their own lives. People with less income have fewer life chances and must spend their restricted resources to obtain basic living requirements.…

    • 1699 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through the course of time, members of society have experienced racial and gender inequalities to extend that members in society also face class difference. Class difference will dictate individual’s position of power in society. In society there are two groups of people, those who owns the means of production and those who don’t. In the article, “From the Communist Manifesto (1848)”, Marx examines the class division in society. The capitalist system divides into two different classes, the bourgeoisie in modern day known as the 1% and the proletariat which are considered the working members of society. This system is established to benefit the bourgeoisie (1%), thus leading to the alienation and exploration of working…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx often capitalizes on the notion that what distinguishes humans from other animals is rooted in 1) our existential purpose (through our relationship with nature and our surroundings) and 2) our social interaction (our relationship with other human beings) – in short, this can be thought of as labor (because, in the capitalist system, labor is a process which encompasses both of those things to some degree). In capitalism, both of those relationships are diabolically purported into a system in which the worker is subject to misery and suffering by nature of his occupation. In civilized societies, man’s primary goal in life is not constrained to the necessities of subsistence (food, water, shelter, procreation) because, according to Marx, if material production is the point of departure when analyzing capitalist society, we can accept the aforementioned as “given”. Without these limitations, human purpose expands exponentially, no longer are people required to do labor (as we have defined above, by the two principles) simply for the sake of their mere survival, but rather…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sociology 100

    • 3219 Words
    • 13 Pages

    15 short-answer based questions ½ page. Define, get examples and write answer. If there are 2 sides to a question, mention them.…

    • 3219 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx's Theory of Class

    • 349 Words
    • 1 Page

    Marx believed that there were two basic classes that existed in his period: capitalists and labourers. He distinguished capitalists as the dominant group and the labourers as the inferior. The dominant class control the means of production and the lower class is forced to provide labour. Based on this, it is axiomatically acknowledged through historical evidence that forms conflict occur in every differentiated society. More importantly, Marx said “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles”, meaning history is basically a struggle between classes for dominance, regardless of the era.…

    • 349 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx

    • 1993 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Class is not simply an ideology legitimising oppression: it denotes exploitative relations between people mediated by their relations to the means of production. In Marxian and similar theories, the term ‘class’ is used as a technical term connected with a theory of ownership and control.…

    • 1993 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Manifesto

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Marx and Engels defined class by the ownership of property. Such ownership grants a person with the power to exclude others from the property and to use it for personal purposes. In relation to property there are three great classes of society: the bourgeoisie, who own the means of production such as machinery and factory buildings, the landowners whose income is rent, and the proletariat who own their labor and sell it for a wage. “Freeman and slave, patrician and plebian, lord and serf, guild-masters and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant opposition to one another, carried on an uninterrupted, now hidden, now open fight, a fight that each time ended in a revolutionary reconstitution of society at large, or in the common ruin of contending classes” (Manifesto). Class is determined by property, not by income or status. Class is therefore a theoretical and formal relationship among individuals.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxism

    • 2818 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Wright states, “instead of seeing “classlessness” as the practical normative principle motivating Marxeist theory, this principle might better be though of as “less classness.” This implies a shift from an idealized end state to a variable process. Capitalisms vary in the degree of exploitation and inequality that characterize their class structures and in the extent to which socialist elements have interpenetrated the system of production. 131…

    • 2818 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The area of social stratification has been the starting point of many arguments about how and why societies are divided. Some societies will shout that they are classless whilst others will construct a whole culture around the divisions within. Individuals will vehemently point out that they are from one class when others have said differently. Some groups within society will inform other groups that they are in an especially disadvantaged position because of all the other groups advantaged position. In short, social stratification is a minefield waiting for the sociologist to jump into, backwards and blindfolded. However, even with this hostile environment, sociologists have tried to explain the reason why society is stratified. What follows is a brief analysis of the ideas of the two major stratification theorists, Karl Marx and Max Weber. For Marxists, class is a matter of economics, that is, how the individual fits into the pattern of modern capitalist society. Put simply, there are two main classes: the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. The bourgeoisie consist of those individuals who own the means of production, property, factories, and etc, and exploit the proletariat who only own, or can sell their labour to the bourgeoisie. The bourgeoisie gain profit from the proletariat by extracting surplus value, that is, by paying them less than the product is worth. Marx argued that the whole of capitalist society was constructed in order to support this idea including the society's infrastructure. One of the most important support mechanisms for the bourgeoisie being the creation of a false class consciousness for the proletariat, by which individuals do not feel that they are exploited. Marx distinguished between a "class in itself" and a "class for itself." A class in itself is simply a social group whose members share the same relationship to the means of production. He goes on to argue that a social group only fully becomes a class when it becomes a class for…

    • 1120 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    One cannot discuss production without comparing it to exchange and both these concepts cannot be discussed without linking them to kinship and the concept “domestic mode of production”. Humanity is dependent on modes of production, distribution and consumption in everyday life. Wolf (1982) states that “Marx adopted the term production for this complex set of mutually dependent relations among nature, work, social labor and social organization” (Wolf, E. 1982:74). Production is therefore the process of converting raw materials into a material for human use. Wolf (1982) notes that Marx illustrated that there was a difference between work and labor. “Work represents the activities of individuals, singularly or in groups, expending energy to produce…

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays