Preview

Criminal Defense Case Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
787 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Criminal Defense Case Analysis
Criminal Defense Case Analysis When a person is charged with a crime the type of defense that they choose could ultimately determine their fate. There are many different types of defenses that exist in our criminal justice system. In this paper I will be taking a brief look at two different cases that have implored two different types of criminal defenses. I will look at the nature and types of defenses used in the cases and what evidence was used to demonstrate defense. I will describe how justification and excuse played a role in the cases and I will also be describing the outcome of each case. The first case that I will be examining will be in the case of the sleepwalking defense. On May 3, 1987, 23 year-old, Kenneth Parks, drove 14 miles to his wife’s parents house and viciously attacked them, killing his wife’s mother and severely wounding her father. “Accounts say he removed a tire iron from the car and entered the house, where he proceeded to beat his mother-in-law to death and choke his father-in-law into unconsciousness, while stabbing them with their own kitchen knife (Ramsland).” He then drove himself to a police station to turn himself in. “He told the cops over and over “I think I have killed some people with my bare hands”, identifying his victims and claiming it was “all my fault” (Ramsland).” “Kenneth Parks had a prior history of sleepwalking, so his attorney decided to use the defense of homicidal somnambulism (Ramsland).” Parks claimed he had no memory of any of the events of the night in question, and could only remember waking up in police custody, so therefore must have been “sleepwalking.” “On May 25, 1988, the jury acquitted Parks of murder and later of attempted murder, and while controversial the verdict stood (Ramsland).” This case is one of very few where the “sleepwalking” excuse actually worked. Others who attempted this same tactic later on, was found very unsuccessful, in other words not so lucky as Kenneth Parks had


References: Koenig, J. (2009, June 21). The 7 most baffling criminal defenses. Retrieved from http://www.cracked.com/article_17470_the-7-most-baffling-criminal-defenses-that-sort-worked.html Mills, N. (1994, June 06). The shame of "black rage" defense. Retrieved from http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1994-06-06/news/9406060097_1_kunstler-and-kuby-william-kunstler-colin-ferguson Ramsland, K. (n.d.). Automatism: The sleepwalker 's defense. Retrieved from http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/criminal_mind/psychology/automatism/1_index.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Salinas V Texas

    • 1542 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On the morning of December 18, 1992, two brothers were shot and killed in their Houston home. Police were called by a neighbor who heard the gunshots, and then seen a “dark colored” car fleeing from the house. It was later found out that defendant, Genovevo Salinas, was at the residence where the murders took place the night before December 18th. When officers went to Salinas’ house, they arrived to a dark blue vehicle that matched the witness’s account of the car. Police asked Salinas a few questions, he let the officers have his shotgun, and then the police asked him to come down to the station to answer a few questions so they could “clear him as a suspect.”…

    • 1542 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sheriff's Case Analysis

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The irony of the case centers on the sheriff’s campaign promises to return integrity to the office of sheriff. In an interview with the Palm Coast observer on October 24, 2012, while Manfre was a candidate for sheriff, he stated ““violated the public trust. … You’re not supposed to use your position to get things other people cannot get. … He’s the sheriff; … ignorance of the law is not a defense” referring to the incumbent sheriff. The demise of Donald Fleming, the previous sheriff, was due in part to a sustain ethics violation while in office. Manfre, shortly after taking office, changed the sheriff’s office mission statement to reflect the work of the office would be done with accountability, integrity and respect (Flagler Mission, 2013).…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bert and Jack Scenario

    • 945 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This essay will look at the case of Jack, who was charged with the attempted murder on Bert, and the subsequent dismissal of the charge. The difference between an incomplete and a complete attempt will be discussed along with the impossibility defense. The length that a defense attorney should morally and ethically go to in order to provide an adequate defense for their client will also be looked at.…

    • 945 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Danny Harold Rolling shall remain within the history of our criminal justice system as the most diabolical figure to emerge into society since his predecessor, Theodore Robert Bundy. Rolling had not managed to accumulate the same amount of murders as Bundy. However, he embarked upon a brutal tour, which succeeded to administer profound unrest into the heart of a community. Rolling was eventually apprehended by police and stood trial for the awful actions he had committed. Such deeds by which were regarded as not only legally deplorable, but also morally malevolent. In this paper, I shall present essential elements, to which served as prominent factors throughout the investigative and judicial process. I should hope to illustrate a vivid structure of facts, history, and testimony, which invokes the notion that Danny Rolling had to have been psychologically ill. Upon that notion, Rolling should not have been executed.…

    • 2737 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper will locate two cases that discuss various types of criminal defenses. The two choices are: (1) The Jeffrey Dahmer Case, and (2) State v. Fisher Involuntary Manslaughter Case. The two cases analysis in which this paper identifies and examines the types of criminal defenses that were used. This paper will also explain the nature and types of defenses used in the cases and what evidence was used to demonstrate the defense. This paper will describe how justification and excuse play a role in the cases. This paper will also describe the outcome of each case.…

    • 2165 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mr. Welch Case

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The purpose of this essay is to review and analyze a case of criminal law to make a determination of the possible homicide offense(s) that the defendant may be charged with. The case at hand is dealing with an estranged husband, Mr. William Welch, who gets into a verbal altercation with his wife, Mrs. Renee Welch, and her friend, Mr. Ben Powers. This verbal altercation starts with the verbal altercation and later leads to Mr. Welch shooting and killing Mr. Powers. At the trial, Mr. Welch claims that the killing was an act of self-defense, but the jury does not agree and finds him guilty of a homicide offense. The job at hand today is to break this case down into the facts, issue, and rules to properly analyze and conclude what offense(s)…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On January 13th 1999, a girl named Hae Min Lee was killed and buried in Leakin Park. Her ex-boyfriend, Adnan Syed, was convicted of this murder case and there are still holes and facts that don’t add up to help the situation. This case was so interesting that a podcast was made to research and try to find an answer. The woman, Sarah, made this podcast and worked on years of research but was unable to come to a final saying on whether or not Adnan was truly innocent or guilty. In my opinion, I feel there is not enough evidence to tell if he is innocent or guilty because of Jay’s story, the call records, and the Nisha call.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Defense Analysis

    • 881 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the greatest right’s we have in America is the right to be innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. It is ultimately the job of the prosecutor to prove to the people, the jury and to the court that the accused is in fact guilty of a crime. The accused either has his own or appointed attorney to present his various defenses to argue why he acted the way he did during the crime. According to Criminal Law Today, “A defense consists of evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorneys to show why that person should not be held liable for a criminal charge” (Schmalleger 2010, pg. 114). This paper will discuss various forms of criminal defenses and how they are used in court.…

    • 881 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This paper will talk about the meaning of the insanity defense. It will also include the definition of the words not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI) and guilty but mentally ill (GBMI). Will answer question how insanity and psychology’s role in the definition. As well as how frequently is the insanity defense is used and how successful it is. In addition to the common beliefs about the insanity defense and their accuracy. For example, it will discuss some of the concerns or major criticisms about the insanity defense and the legitimacy to those concerns.…

    • 99 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this Phase 4 research paper we are asked to read a case scenario about a prominent member of the community being robbed and assaulted with a deadly weapon, and form an opinion, setting up an outline for further in depth study. The case scenario we were given is this: Around 2:30 p.m. on the afternoon of September 18, the victim, a prominent citizen in the…

    • 3172 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Insanity as a Defense Views

    • 2905 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Each year the number of murders increases. Do you ever wonder if these murders would stop if the “criminals” were not given the verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI)? In order to be eligible for this an individual must not be in a correct state of mind when the murder took place. Oftentimes, people feel that lawyers misrepresent clients as insane; when in actuality the client is competent to decipher right from wrong. In the following text, we will analyze our research of what effects Texas A&M students’ views on using insanity defense in murder trials, focusing on political views, number of sociology or psychology classes taken, and hometown population size.…

    • 2905 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Hartley, R. D., & Rabe, G. A. (2008). Criminal Courts: Structures, Process, and Issues (2nd ed.).…

    • 1585 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Today in our legal system, there are numerous amounts of defense tactics that are designed to protect the rights of the accused, and to further the process of justice. However, in many cases this augmentation of justice has been taken too far, and as a result, pleas such as “Temporary insanity” are born. Indeed, the insanity defense in itself has been stretched nearly to its breaking point. In this analytical examination of the insanity plea, I will illustrate how, in some cases the insanity plea is necessary while in other cases, the use of the insanity plea is illegitimate.…

    • 2382 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    department was already a rising issue (Siegal and Senna 154). It is now becoming a major issue that continues to worsen. As we all know police officers are very closely involved with the citizens of our community, but I ask myself how close is to close? Police officers are now…

    • 3664 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Legal Defenses Checkpoint

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Three legal defenses that could be used in court to excuse behavior are insanity, self-defense, and entrapment. Insanity is when the defendant did not know what he or she was doing at the time of the crime, or did not know that it was wrong. It is when the individual is not in their right mind because of mental illness or such. Usually they are sent to psychiatric facilities for treatment and if treated, they are transferred to prisons to complete their terms. Self-defense is when the victim of a potentially deadly attack kills another because it is the only reasonable thing to do to protect them from bodily harm and they are unable to get away. Those who use the self-defense plea are saying that they acted appropriately for the situation and not doing so would have resulted in their own death or serious injury. “Entrapment is a situation in which the government takes actions that lead to or ‘create an opportunity’ for crime to happen” (Meyer & Grant, 2003, p. 41). For example, a government agent convincing someone to commit a crime, who would otherwise not commit a crime. Entrapment is rarely a successful defense and not valid unless it was a government agent persuading or planting the idea in an individual. Meyer & Grant (2003) state that, “to be a crime, an act requires three important elements: actus reus, mens rea, and concordance between the two” (p. 28). The act must be a guilty act or omission (actus reus), meaning voluntary and breaking an existing criminal statute, and have a guilty state of mind (mens rea). However, there is an exception, say when one is convicted of a crime like vehicular homicides with no intend to harm anyone.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays