Preview

Criminal Acts and Choice Theories

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1201 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Criminal Acts and Choice Theories
Criminal Acts and Choice Theories

CJA 490- Survey of Criminal Justice

Abstract In society, people always want to point a finger as to who did what and why. For centuries, theorists have come up with ideas to try to identify and explain why people commit crimes. What causes them the break the law, even when they know the repercussions for their actions. Many theories have been brought up, but only a few have surpassed time and are approved by society and law enforcement. These choice theories hypothesize on why how and why people commit crimes, they are also accepted through our society and they affect law enforcement as well as the government.

Criminal Acts and Choice Theory It is very easy, now a days with the media, to glamorize crimes and certain cases that have created a spectacle. Many of these famous criminal cases always question the motive of the crime. With this question, come many answers, some leading to theories as to why this particular person would commit the crime they did. Theories try to give an explanation to a cause and link and explain cause and effect. In Criminology, choice theories attempt to explain the reasons a person decided to engage in certain behaviors that caused they to break the law. Some of these theories, such as the rationale theory and sociological theories have a great impact on society as well have affected the criminal justice system. According to Frank Schmalleger, “some theories of human behavior help us understand why certain people engage in acts that society defines as criminal or deviant, while others do not” (78). Once a theory is implemented it must be tested, with some of these trial an error tests come results thus either proving the theory or discrediting it due to the results. Some theories that can be in today’s society and thinking are Classical and Neoclassical theories. Within these theories, the belief is that the offender that committed the crime did so out of his own free will. The

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Choice theories are based on a perspective on crime causation that holds that criminality is the result of…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The two most common models that are used to determine which acts are considered criminal are the consensus model and the conflict model. The consensus model is a model in which the majority of the people within that society share the same basic values and beliefs. If anyone in that society deviates from the established norms of that society and their behavior threatens the well being of the group, than they must be punished. Consensus means majority, so that means that the majority of the people within that group must agree what is considered right and what is considered wrong in order to determine what is to be deemed criminal or not. So when that society’s…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rational choice model sustains that offenders choose crime from other possible courses of action when the reward is in their self-interest. On the other hand, cognitive psychologists, economists and professionals from the criminological mainstream define crime as a choice; they have the assumption that “the decision to commit a criminal act springs from the offender’s assessment of its anticipated net utilities”.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay I will be comparing and contrasting the Rational Choice Theory(s) and the Trait Theory(s). We will start with the history of the two theories and progress toward some of the individual principles in the theories. Next step will be explaining how each theory contributes to criminal behavior. My closing paragraph will conclude the essay as well as give detailed information on how society punishes the crimes committed.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Different choice theories and models exist that relate to crime. Some of the choice theories that mention in the book Criminal Justice Today an introductory text for the 21st Century, 10th edition are as followed: Choice theory, the classical school, biological theory, psychological theory, and the labeling theory. Each has its own way to explain how and why a person commits a crime. Two models in the text are the crime controlled model and the due process model.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    CIS 170

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    They are many Criminal Theories from Psychological theories, social theories, deterrence theories and a few more but let focus on, Choice Theory, known as, rational choice theory. People will engage in delinquents and criminal behavior after weighting consequences and benefits of their actions. According to this review in, motivated people, after consideration, will commit crime if they believe that it will provide immediate benefits without the threat of long-term risk (David, et al, 2006). If people have a choice to do crime or do the right thing, why do they choose crime? What causes a person to choice crime? Poverty, conventional life styles, environment, social life, preexisting physical conditions, genetics or theirs past childhood. Many explanation can be an argument and it cause go on, and on.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. How might you use the strategies for applying creativity to problems and issues in addressing this topic?…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The consensus model and the conflict model are the two ways society use to determine if an act is criminal. The consensus model is saying that society agrees with the views of right and wrong (Schmalleger, 2011). Consensus model is also showing society in agreement that anything that can cause harm to others is a criminal act (Schmalleger, 2011). The conflict model says that groups in power decide what a criminal act is (Schmalleger, 2011). The consensus model works together to make the system work while the conflict model argues whose view is right.…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    For hundreds of years, people have been trying to understand criminals and what causes people to act criminally. Many theories were created and some became more widely accepted than others. In the 1700s, a new perspective into criminality rose; the classical perspective. Father of the classical perspective, Cesare Beccaria, provided theories much different from the previous ideas about why people commit crimes. He and others who believed in the classical perspective focused on the idea of free will, and how people weigh the cost and benefits before committing a crime. Beccaria was also a big promoter of deterrence and how it plays a key role in helping reduce crime in societies. After the age of the classical perspective, the father of a new perspective came about, Cesare Lombroso and the positivist perspective. Backed up by theories posed by Charles Darwin, the positivist perspective quickly became widely popular. This perspective rejected the classical ideas and in turn said people do not have free will and do not rationally decide to commit a crime. Their criminal actions were based off of many outside biological, sociological, and psychological factors. Given these widely different beliefs, it is easy to set apart these two perspectives. The opposing views of free will and rational choice, the ways in which positivists think they can identify criminals, and the method for stopping crime are all major aspects that differ a lot between these viewpoints.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Prison Models

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Theory: Classical, belief that humans operate under free will and an offender makes a choice to engage in criminal behavior believing benefits outweigh the costs.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Social Controls

    • 2967 Words
    • 12 Pages

    This essay will thoroughly examine and evaluate the claim that it is social controls that prevent us from committing crimes by looking at different social control theories. Firstly we must determine what a social control theory consists of, according to Hopkins (2009) ‘social control theory is fundamentally derived from a conception of human nature that proposes that there are no natural limits on elementary human needs and desires. People will always want and seek further economic reward and it is thus not necessary to look for special motives for engaging in criminal activity. Human beings are born free to break the law and will only refrain from doing so under particular circumstances. It is these fundamental assumptions that form the basis of social control theories’ (Hopkins 2009, p.246). Therefore controls set in society are the reason humans do not commit crime, if these controls were to be removed humans would naturally due to their nature commit crime. This also shows that social control theories try and solve the question of ‘why do people not commit crime?’ rather than ‘what causes people to commit crime?’ The reason behind solving the first question rather than the second is because social control theorists believe committing crime is the default position of every human therefore the second question has already been solved.…

    • 2967 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Annotated Outline

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. Cornish, D. B. & Clarke, R.V. (2003). Crime as a Rational Choice. In F.T. Cullen & R. Agnew (Eds.), Criminological Theory: Past to Present (Essential readings) (2nd Ed.) (p. 278). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Crime has existed for as long as human beings have been able to differentiate between actions that are good and actions that are bad. Whether or not an action that is considered bad is a crime is determined by laws set forth by local, state, or federal governments and the severity of the crime is determined by those whose job it is to interpret the laws, such as a police officer or a judge. While differentiating between what is and is not a crime can be as easy as determining whether or not a law had been broken, figuring out the offender’s motivation for committing a crime is a more complex task. Criminology is a multidisciplinary social science that studies the causes, types, and reactions to criminal behavior. Criminologists attempt to explain a person or group of people’s reasons or motivations behind why a crime was committed using criminological theories. One reason this is done is to aid in the creation of policies within the criminal justice system to better understand why crime is committed and find ways to prevent future crimes from occurring.…

    • 2478 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminological Theory

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nonetheless, the ideal criminological theory would also deal with human behavior. In that the ideal criminological theory deals with human behaviors, it is only fair to employ the social science approach in which researchers can deal with probabilities. For example, when conducting research to uncover the causes of criminal behavior, some social science researchers would utter statements such as,”self-control helps dictate the way offenders behave themselves, an offender who has low self control is more likely to use narcotics than an offender who has a higher level of self-control”. For researchers to use this theory to its highest effectiveness the theory must make sense and explain as much criminal behaviors as possible; it must also be as concise as possible. Most important, the theory must be validity (Indiana Courts, 2010).…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Scorcese’s film, The Departed, gives a great depiction of contrasting theories of the origins of crime, and how they may be applied to each character. Each of the four major theories, Choice Theory, Trait Theory, Social Structure Theory, and Social Process Theory can be seen to be accurate at one or more points in the film, but the film ultimately advocates for Choice Theory. Each of the major characters has the opportunity to choose who they ultimately want to be.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays