Corruption In Animal Farm
Animal Farm Essay
Imagine a world where no one has any personal freedoms. In Animal Farm, George Orwell depicts a society failing to create the true communist ideals in order to address the topic of corruption. This allegorical novel can be compared to Cambodia’s politically corrupt communist party, the Khmer rouge. Although existing generations apart, Orwell’s work and the Khmer Rouge both send the message that society often fails to bring ideals into reality.
The corruption of the pigs shows that the imperfection of modern society doesn’t allow for communism to employ its real intentions. As the pigs morph into the new humans, Mr. Pilkington remarks, “that the lower animals on the farm did more work and receive less food than any other animal in the country” (Orwell 94). One of the core ideas of animalism was that without the greedy humans, animals would have more food for themselves, but the corrupt control of the pigs has lead to exact problem. Towards the end of the book the pigs change the commandments to say: “All animals are …show more content…
The khmer Rouge wanted to turn the land into a, “ communist agrarian utopia. In reality, they emptied cities and evacuated millions of people to labor camps” (United to End Genocide- “The Cambodian Genocide”). They took the idea of shared farms and polluted it until it became labor camps, killing fields, and mass graves. The Khmer Rouge targeted the well educated when Pol Pot, the leader himself, and many other high-ranking members were university-educated and relatively affluent (United to End Genocide- “The Cambodian Genocide”). The Khmer Rouge wanted to eradicate the well educated and wealthy, possibly to limit the Cambodians free thinking, when they were murdering people just like them. The privileges and double standards that the Khmer Rouge had resemble that of the pigs in Animal
Imagine a world where no one has any personal freedoms. In Animal Farm, George Orwell depicts a society failing to create the true communist ideals in order to address the topic of corruption. This allegorical novel can be compared to Cambodia’s politically corrupt communist party, the Khmer rouge. Although existing generations apart, Orwell’s work and the Khmer Rouge both send the message that society often fails to bring ideals into reality.
The corruption of the pigs shows that the imperfection of modern society doesn’t allow for communism to employ its real intentions. As the pigs morph into the new humans, Mr. Pilkington remarks, “that the lower animals on the farm did more work and receive less food than any other animal in the country” (Orwell 94). One of the core ideas of animalism was that without the greedy humans, animals would have more food for themselves, but the corrupt control of the pigs has lead to exact problem. Towards the end of the book the pigs change the commandments to say: “All animals are …show more content…
The khmer Rouge wanted to turn the land into a, “ communist agrarian utopia. In reality, they emptied cities and evacuated millions of people to labor camps” (United to End Genocide- “The Cambodian Genocide”). They took the idea of shared farms and polluted it until it became labor camps, killing fields, and mass graves. The Khmer Rouge targeted the well educated when Pol Pot, the leader himself, and many other high-ranking members were university-educated and relatively affluent (United to End Genocide- “The Cambodian Genocide”). The Khmer Rouge wanted to eradicate the well educated and wealthy, possibly to limit the Cambodians free thinking, when they were murdering people just like them. The privileges and double standards that the Khmer Rouge had resemble that of the pigs in Animal