Preview

Corona: Supreme Court of the United States

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2426 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Corona: Supreme Court of the United States
Issues:

1. SALN

2. Which of the two court is superior in the impeachment case the Supreme Court or the Impeachment Court

3. Cold Neutrality of Impartial Judges

Facts:

First and foremost regarding the SALN of Chief Justice Corona the prosecution claims that CJ Corona has 45 properties. However they were able to present only 21 properties which in his account named after him and his family. According to a key member of the President Aquino’s Cabinet the government has evidence to prove that Chief Justice Renato Corona has ill-gotten wealth that could not have been acquired with his salary in the judiciary, and the evidence would be presented by the House prosecution team in the impeachment trial. Followed by the Presidential adviser on political affairs Ronald Llamas saying that “The House prosecution panel obtained documents that would show that Corona may have amassed ill-gotten wealth, including at least four multimillion-peso real estate properties,” . Meanwhile Corona says “Many of those in the list are not ours. They are owned by people I don’t even know; some by parents of our children-in-law,”. Still the House prosecution panel will ask the Senate impeachment court to subpoena Corona’s statement of assets, liabilities and net worth (SALN) for 2010. The prosecution is saying that “They are refusing to release the SALN despite our repeated appeal. We have no option but to ask the impeachment court to subpoena it during the trial,” . IBP reacts on the release of the SALN saying that the prosecution’s matching Corona’s income tax returns (ITRs) with his statements of assets, liabilities and net worth (SALNs) has not established prima facie presumption of guilt to warrant Corona’s conviction. Emphasizing also that 1379, or the law stipulating the handling of properties found to have been unlawfully acquired by public officers or employees. The lawyers’ group said RA 1379 states that prima facie guilt can be established “only if



Bibliography: Philstar dated January 16, 2012 Philstar dated January 17, 2012 Philstar dated January 19, 2012 http://getrealphilippines.com/blog/2012/01/coronas-trial-the-need-to-understand-what-justice-really-is/ http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleId=769689&publicationSubCategoryId=63 http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleId=772005&publicationSubCategoryId=63 http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleId=764944&publicationSubCategoryId=63 http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleId=776646&publicationSubCategoryId=63 http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/142963/sc-senate-impeachment-court-equals-says-fr-bernas http://www.bworldonline.com/content.php?section=9&title=Political-animals-as-judges&id=46437

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Chapters 5-9 Study guide

    • 2328 Words
    • 10 Pages

    8. In the federal court system, which of the following prosecutes the vast majority of criminal cases?…

    • 2328 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One source must be from an approved website (listed above) and the other source from an electronic database (Gale Virtual Reference Library) or resource book.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Article VI of the U.S. Constitution asserts that “This Constitution … shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.” Statutes and ordinances are laws passed by Congress and by state legislatures that make up most of criminal law. Each state has a statutory criminal code as does the federal government.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Us. V. Nixon Court Case

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    c) Does the separation of powers permit that the settlement of this dispute must stay contained in the executive branch or should it be determined by the judicial branch?…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Re-read Act 1 from page 34 (Carol: What do you think?) to the end of page 41. Discuss how Mamet presents the significance and the effects of misunderstanding in this extract and at least one other point in the play.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did the University of California violate the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause, and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, by practicing an affirmative action policy that resulted in the repeated rejection of Bakke's application for admission to its medical school?…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the days of Chief Justice John Marshall, The Supreme Court has been the arbiter of constitutionality among the three branches of government. Through this judicial review, The Supreme Court has become the bastion of The Constitution. In the current case of Zivotofsky v. Kerry, the very checks and balances that hold the triarchy of American government stable are bearing inspection. Fomented in a small passage of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act in 2002 with, “for purposes of the registration of birth, certification of nationality, or issuance of a passport of a United States citizen born in the city of Jerusalem, the Secretary shall, upon the request of the citizen or the citizen’s legal guardian, record the place of birth as Israel”…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The film Twelve Angry Men suggest that The United States Judicial system is very unfair to the person being tried.In this trial, the defendant is being tried for killing his father. Some of the men in the jury are chosen very poorly. One example of them being chosen poorly is their past clouds their judgment. Juror number three had a bad past with his son which lead him to believe that all children are ungrateful and useless. “You're right. It's the kids. The way they are you know? They don't listen. I've got a kid. When he was 8 years old, he ran away from a fight. I saw him. I was so ashamed I told him right out “I'm going to make a man out of you or I'm going to have to bust you up into little pieces trying.” When he was 15 he hit me in the face. He's big, you know. I haven't seen him in three years. Rotten kid! You work your heart out.... All right let's get on with it.” This is unfair to the defendant because he's now seen as ungrateful and rotten to juror number three even before the case. The US should look…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2013, the Colombia Supreme Court chose to upset his sentence, despite the fact that the court still made it clear in their sentiments that flexibility of assessment was not total and that writers could in any case be indicted for criticism. Despite the fact that this choice is just a halfway stride forward, the court's choice says a lot without bounds of the Colombian press. This decision opens the entryway for further decriminalization of defamation and less oversight for the press.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When the U.S. Supreme Court, in its discretion, decides to take a case, it is said that the Court has:…

    • 610 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Supreme Court justices are appointed in the same manner as all Federal Constitutional Judges, by the President with the advise of the U.S. Senate for life terms without a reduction in pay. This is to assure judicial independence. The impact would be enormous if the Supreme Court justices had to be elected to office by the people. If they were elected by the people they would not make every decision fairly, they would not be in office for life and they wouldn't be as well respected.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Identify and describe two limits placed upon the powers of the United States Supreme Court. First, the U.S. Constitution and Supreme Court are at the top of a pyramid with a very wide state and local base of criminal justice administration. So the Supreme Court has to depend on local courts, prosecutors, and police officers to apply its decisions to day-to-day operations. Second, and just as important, U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, and state courts answer constitutional questions the Supreme Court hasn’t answered yet—and often never will (Amsterdam 1970, 785).…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many hoops that a case must jump through in order to reach the federal supreme court, and there are different tracks in which it can get there. The Supreme Court can have original jurisdiction, it can reach the court via the federal system, and it can reach it via the state courts. The Supreme Court receives thousands of cases a year, and will only hear from approximately 80.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Judicial Branch

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Our American judiciary branch of the federal government has contributed and molded our American beliefs in this great nation. This branch of government is respected because of the code of conduct that the judges, no matter how conservative or liberal. The language of the court as well as the uniform of the cloaks that judges wear has most probably contributed towards this widespread respect. Throughout the history of the United States, I noticed a pattern of “cause and effect” that our judiciary branch had practiced. I noticed that the judicial branch usually restrain themselves from involving in critical civil policy, but will be active when the time comes when the general public, in which the case is decided, feels a change is needed. We have enough evidence to see how our judicial branch should act. Should the judicial branch be more active towards shaping American policy or restrain as long as possible before being forced to act upon very critical civil policies? Judicial activism is the view that the Supreme Court should be an active and creative partner with the legislative and executive branches in shaping government policy (Wasserman American Politics 138). The believers of this philosophical view of how our judicial branch should be suggest that the Supreme Court more active and participate in molding the policies of American society. It can be argued that during the end of the Civil War and the “Separate but Equal” era, in cases such as the Brown v. Board of Education, Baker v. Carr, Missouri ex. Rel. Gaines v. Canada, and Sweatt v. Painter. The more recent, Bush v. Gore case is a fine example of judicial activism. Judicial Restraint, on the other hand, is the idea that the Court should not impose its views on other branches of the government or the states unless there is a clear violation of the Constitution (Wasserman American Politics 138). Judges, who believes in this form of our court system, say that a passive role of the court is preferred and that…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bryan Tiu

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Lead defense counsel Serafin Cuevas asked the Senate to subpoena Corona’s bank records from BPI. He wanted to show that Corona’s P12 million was not due to a single deposit but accumulated over several transactions.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays