Preview

Controversy On Euthanasia

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
948 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Controversy On Euthanasia
Carrie Shell
Mrs. Arnold
English 111-03
31 October 2014 Euthanasia
For several years, euthanasia has been a subject of controversy. Euthanasia is a fairly new problem for the United States and has gained a horrible reputation from negative media publicity surrounding the issue. According to a website:
Euthanasia also known as mercy killing is a way of painlessly terminating one’s life with the “humane” motive of ending suffering. Euthanasia came into the public eye recently during the Terri Schiavo controversy where her husband appealed for euthanasia while Terri’s family claimed differently.
This is a classical case, shedding light on the pros and cons of mercy killing. (“Pros and Cons”)
Many claim the betrayal of God’s right to control
…show more content…
Doctors now have the technology and the skills to anticipate natural death almost indefinitely. A website article states, “In an attempt to provide medical and emotional care, a doctor does and should prescribe medicines that will relieve suffering even if the medications cause side effects. Euthanasia follows the same theory of dealing with suffering in a way to help one die peacefully” (“Pros and Cons”). There is a distinctive difference between euthanasia and assisted suicide. Euthanasia is the ability to die with dignity, while assisted suicide is assisting one to commit suicide. Euthanasia happens when a physician or other healthcare provider does something, such as administering a known lethal dose of a drug with the patient’s consent. Physician-Assisted Suicide is where the terminally ill patient's request a prescription for a fatal dose of a drug which they can administer to themselves at a time of their choosing. Ernst and Mennie had stated in an article that “both euthanasia and assisted suicide force someone else to end your life. The job of the health care professional is to maintain and enhance life, not end it” (Ernst and Mennie). However, when one thinks of the job of the health care professional it is to add quality and meaning to one’s life. In some situations, when there is a terminally ill patient that will never be able to have quality or meaning in their life wouldn’t it be the duty of the physician to suggest euthanasia so one may die with

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    With that being said, there are two main types of euthanasia called active euthanasia and passive euthanasia. Active euthanasia describes actively attempting to end a patient’s life by means of drugs or a lethal injection. Passive euthanasia is defined as removing or withholding a medicine or treatment that could have prolonged the patient’s life. Recently, there has been much debate on whether or not passive euthanasia is as morally wrong as active euthanasia. Some claim that passive euthanasia is not a direct violation of the basic good of human life, therefore it is morally permissible. They declare active euthanasia, on the other hand, is a direct violation, and therefore is not morally permissible. I will concede that this statement is technically true in a few rare situations, but in the majority of passive euthanasia cases, the patient is being taken off life support because he is tired of living and simply wants to die. And if that is the case, who’s to tell some terminally ill patient that he’s just going to have to live out his remaining days off treatment in pain and without hope. If a terminal patient wants to die, he should be accommodated not simply ignored. If some patients would like to refuse treatment, and live out the rest of their days naturally, that’s their decision too. It’s the patient’s life. Doctors should act on the requests of their patients, not what…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Robert Latimer case, as in many other cases of euthanasia, it can never…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Physicians and patients debate over whether or not physician assisted suicide is okay to do in any circumstances, because there are pros and cons to every side. One might say that if a physician assists in the suicide it may help someone not suffer through a slow painful death. Another person might argue that if a physician does assist even by just prescribing the medicine is morally wrong and against the oath the physician takes at the beginning of his or her career. Understanding some people are terminally ill and want to just die versus putting up the fight is a hard situation to understand, but some physicians do “understand”. Even though they understand does not mean that they will agree to assist in taking the pain away from someone. On the other hand a patient may want to live as long as possible and prosper every bit of their life even if it means being in a vegetative state.…

    • 1256 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Voluntary and assisted euthanasia is not a new phenomenon. End of life care for long term, short term, and terminal illnesses has always occurred. However, with advances in medicine, patients’ lives may be lengthened. For many individuals, end of life care is paired with pain and suffering. Does it have to be this way? If an individual has the capacity to make their own medical decisions, and wants to end their life, should we as health care providers deny them this? We can consider suicide as self-determined…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The simple principles of medical ethics are “to avoid harm”, “to do well”, “the right to act freely”, and “acting fairly towards the patient”. Doctors should try to save patient’s life instead of ending it. They have the responsibility not to kill the trusting patients, but give all their best to secure the life of their patients. Even if the patients are hard to cure, they should still try and not make euthanasia an option. Therefore, doctors do not have the right to decide whether their patients would live or die as long as their patients are alive, there is always a hope for curing. For instance, many European countries are legalizing euthanasia. Unfortunately, not only doctors, but also nurses are favoring euthanasia in the extreme…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    involves life and death issues. For over 2000 years it has been a prohibited medical…

    • 5176 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to James Rachels, in his essay “The Morality of Euthanasia,” the American Medical Association’s Conventional Doctrine in Euthanasia is false. The Conventional Doctrine states that there are certain situations in which letting someone die or passive euthanasia is morally permissible, but killing a patient or active euthanasia is not. For instance, in many circumstances a doctor can withhold treatment and will do nothing wrong if the patient were to die, but if the doctor were to provoke the death of the patient then it would be morally wrong. Rachels’ final goal is not to take a stand on the rightness or wrongness of euthanasia but instead show that if passive euthanasia is morally permissible then active euthanasia is also morally permissible. (define euthanasia)…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Widely publicized stories in the popular media have recently brought the issue of vegetative state and mercy killing to the forefronts of our national discussions. The excruciating ordeals that Terri…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia contradicts the main reason of being a physician. Doctors are known to be healers not killers and this could cause ethical issues. In Kirk Johnson’s letter on behalf of the American Medical Association (AMA) he addresses how euthanasia would make a negative impact. “The involvement of physicians in euthanasia heightens the significance of its ethical prohibition. The physician who performs euthanasia assumes unique responsibility for the act of ending the patient's life. Euthanasia could also readily be extended to incompetent patients and other vulnerable populations. Instead of engaging in euthanasia, physicians must aggressively respond to the needs of patients at the end of life. Patients should not be abandoned once it is determined that cure is impossible. Patients near the end of life must continue to receive emotional support, comfort care, adequate pain control, respect for patient autonomy, and good communication.” He stated an alternative to the suicide, which was that physicians should get the patient ready for his death and make him feel comfortable rather than just ending his…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The concept and practice of physician assisted suicide is a highly debated topic in today’s news. People often question the morals of the physicians who practice euthanasia and there are some who believe that they should not even be considered doctors. Euthanasia is the ending of someone's life through a doctor's help and is still illegal in most countries. One of the most well known advocates for the practice of euthanasia is Jack Kevorkian, who has also been referred to as Dr. Death. He was tried and convicted of second degree murder, however his practice gained a lot of support from the publicity of his trials. Although he is responsible for over 130 deaths, Kevorkian is a hero in today’s standards because of his involvement in the practice…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    activist who tried to legalize assisted suicide under the argument that everyone deserves a humane death. There had been much debate on the issue,…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Physician assisted suicide is similar to euthanasia in many ways but physician assisted suicide may involve prescribing lethal medication, offering advice on various suicidal methods, or helping a patient use a killing device to take their life (Griswold, 2009). Physician assisted suicide differs from euthanasia by the doctor prescribes lethal medication that the patient consumes on their own time instead of killing the patient personally (Newton, 2009). Assisted suicide, like euthanasia, puts the patient in control of the time of their death, the place of their death, and how their death will occur (Walter, 2009). Many laws ban the use of both of these forms of suicide, but many advocates for euthanasia are fighting for the right to use it (Supreme Court upholds right to die, 2003). Much debate is up about the quality of life versus the length of life, which one is more important? (Supreme Court upholds right to die,…

    • 3356 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia which is a term that derives from the Greek word meaning ‘mercy killing or good death’. Although euthanasia is usually seen as a killing that is done for the better of the patient suffering, it is still a controversial subject to this day and age.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doctors around the world use euthanasia to end a patient's life when a doctor feels it's time to end a severely sick patient’s life. Euthanasia is the painless killing of a person suffering from pain physically or mentally, this practice is illegal in most countries. Doctor’s usually turn to assisted suicide when the patient’s body is refusing to get better and not taking any of the treatments in. Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide should be legal in our country because if people want to die peacefully and calmly in the right way, they should. If a person is thinking about ending their life, assisted suicide is the more better option because the patient gets assistance from a doctor and it's in a more calm matter…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A current event or contemporary social issue that involves ethical values would be the debate about Euthanasia and weather it is ethically right or wrong. “The term Euthanasia originated from the Greek word ‘good death’ (Dictionary).” It is the act or practice of ending the life of a person either by lethal injection or the suspension of medical treatment. There are three different types of Euthanasia, voluntary Euthanasia, involuntary Euthanasia, and active Euthanasia. Some of the different types may seem more ethical and socially acceptable than the others.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays