Preview

Conflicts Between Liberty & Equality in Pre-Civil War America

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1351 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Conflicts Between Liberty & Equality in Pre-Civil War America
The conflicts between liberty and equality in America have ranged between minor disagreements to full-out war. The most obvious contingent in the struggle between liberty and equality is slavery, but there was also friction in the women’s suffrage movement and various other attempts to provide equal rights under the law. While slavery in the United States always had its opponents, it wasn’t until 1787 that these detractors started to cause real obstacles for slave owners. During the Philadelphia Convention of 1787, one of the issues raised was whether slaves would be counted as part of the population in determining representation in the United States Congress or considered property not entitled to representation. In a head-to-head battle for power between the generally abolitionist northern states and the generally pro-slavery southern states, compromises of ½ proposed by Benjamin Harrison and ¾ by several New Englanders were rejected with the consensus finally agreeing on a 3/5 compromise proposed by James Madison. The 3/5 Compromise carried a heavy political toll in early America and gave the southern states a distinct political advantage until the abolition of slavery in 1865 with the ratification of the 13th amendment to the US Constitution. Most northeastern states abolished slavery due to influential local campaigns. The settlement of newer Midwestern states by Yankees and Northerners established abolition in these new states as well. After Pennsylvania abolished slavery in 1781, the Mason-Dixon line became the line of demarcation between the free northern states and the slave states of the south. The invention of the cotton gin in 1793 by Eli Whitney caused the slave trade in the southern US to expand and become a central driving force in the southern economy. Lands acquired after the Mexican-American War ended in 1848 raised the issue of slavery in these new territories. Once again, another compromise was reached whereby the occupants of the new

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Slaves where there were exceptions with the wealthiest slave nation in the Americas, men tended to field work and women worked on the cotton gin. There is a new idea of the role of men and women and the relationship between black and white men. The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 made sure that new states developed in the west would be able to claim full statehood once their population reached the lowest population of older states. Jefferson, American Founding Father wanted to spread ideas around with the opposition of the continuity of the republic. The three fifth's compromise in 1787 determined that each slave should be counted as three-fifths of a person for the purpose of taxation and representation in the state. This agreement allowed unequal…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the 1760s to the 1860s opposition to slavery grew and morphed, culminating in the outbreak of the American Civil War. The writing of the Three-Fifths Clause, in 1787 (Source 1) reveals how, from the birth of the Union, the issue of slavery forced sides to come to uneasy compromises. Slavery at this time was purely a political and economic issue. Throughout the 100 years however, the opposition to slavery evolved. The formation the single issue party, The Free Soil party, in 1848, symbolised a shift towards a moral opposition to slavery. Although the Free Soil Party had an economic incentive to push for the abolition of slavery, they also argued that free men on free soil offered a morally superior system to slavery. Magee depicts the multifaceted…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The three-fifths Compromise: The problem was that the southern states thought the slaves should be counted in population, not for taxation, but the northern states opposed. The south had less free people than the north, so they wanted an equal say in the government. After much deliberation, a compromise was made. The south needed a compromise in order to ratify the constitution for themselves. They decided to make all free people count as a whole, and all non-free people count as 3/5 of a person, but also, the non-free people counted as 3/5 for taxation purposes as well.…

    • 295 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1787 the three-fifths compromise was enacted. It was one of the most controversial topics at the time. The three-fifths compromise was a way for southerners to ensure that they weren’t out-numbered in the House of Representative. James Williams, a northern coincidentally proposed the three-fifths act. It didn’t benefit the north because they…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The three-fifths compromise was system in between the states to determine a person who is enslaved as a three-fifths of a person. The south was overpopulated and continued to grow due to slavery James Wilson proposed this in 1787 and this showed how proslavery was forced during those times. Because the Virginia Plan was denied, the three-fifths compromise was suggested and made the cut for the south to be powerfully represented in the House of Representatives and have too much power when electing presidents. Compared to the northerner states they seemed to disregard slavery. The difference between he northerner states and southern was that the northerner states counted one free man as one vote and one slave not a vote to southern states counting the slaves as a vote as well as one free man as a vote.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conflict derived from the fact that many states had a large population of slaves, counting these slaves would greatly effect a states population. States with large slave populations wanted all of their slaves to count in the population in contrast the states with low to no slaves wanted only the free population counted. The proposal that was adopted was the three-fifths compromise. With this every three out of five slaves would be counted for representation and taxation. The method for counting the population would be by a census every ten…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Northerners opposed slavery, whereas the agriculture dependent Southerners supported it. It was on this issue that the most acerbic debates took place. For the unity and efficiency of the whole country, both sides gave in and made the most famous of the compromises, the Three-Fifth Clause, which won unanimous approval. Not wanting to loose the valuable revenues from the South, the Northerners compromised again in the Constitution by prohibiting Congress from outlawing the slave trade for at least twenty years in order to appeal to the masses. Was this necessarily the right and just decision? No. But it undeniably guaranteed the South as a part of the…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    states. This agreement raised the legislative view of slaves from not being human, to being 3/5…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of the biggest issues contested during the Constitutional Convention was the fate of the slave trade. Northern states wanted it abolished largely because of the negotiated three-fifths rule which allowed slaves to be counted toward the number of delegates the House of Representatives would have. Southern representatives rebuked this idea completely and threatened to walk out of the Convention. Since the cooperation of the Southern states was crucial for the creation of a strong federal government, Northern delegates made considerable compromises. These compromises included extending the slave trade until 1808, the prohibition of taxing slave exports, and the implementation of the Fugitive Slave…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Three-Fifth clause is a compromise that said for every five slaves, three of them would count towards the state’s population. The Three-Fifth clause conference was held at the United States Constitutional Convention in the year 1787 and was enforced in states that allowed slavery. The reason for the Three-Fifth clause is because the states had to figure out a system of representation and didn’t know how to count the slaves. The Northern states didn’t want the slaves to be counted towards the population because the slaves were seen as property in the Southern states and the Northern states were concerned that if the Southern states had too many representatives, they would be able to out vote the North on many issues including slavery and…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three Fifth Compromises

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    ’s right. We know today’s constitution is changed many times, so some way is different with the original constitution. In the original constitution some ways did address slavery but some aspects not mentioned. “Three Fifth compromises” is a clause about the slavery. This clause made slave counted to three fifth human when the voting.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A) The three-fifths compromise made by James Wilson was to help the southern states maintain slavery. This was only as long as the southern states fought for the Northwest Ordinance, and proportional representation. The three-fifths compromise is one of the most well-known compromises. This compromise had the notion that slaves would count as three fifths of a person. This compromise would settle the debated issue over whether slaves were to be considered a human or property. In addition, it allowed the southern states to have a more proportional representation of their population. In The Summer of 1787, it states “Wilson’s new resolution required the allocation of seats in the House of Representatives on the basis of an equitable ratio of representation in proportion to the whole number of white & other free citizens & inhabitants . . . and three-fifths of all other persons not comprehended in the foregoing description, except Indians not paying taxes. . .” (Stewart 78). The compromise created an alliance with the large states and the south. This alliance not only assisted Wilson with his votes, but protected slavery for the south. Lastly, the Northwest Ordinance prohibited slavery in the new western territories. The new western territories were starting to become more popular, and a choice would have to be made on the issue of slavery laws would be. When Congressman Nathan Dane proposed the prohibition of slavery in these territories, many slave states agreed to the…

    • 2289 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Revolutionary Era from 1765-1815, slavery existed in thirteen colonies. Maryland went from white servants to slaves. There was an agricultural economy that existed in the South that was dependent on the labor of slaves. Although slavery did not exist in the North exclusively; New York, Philadelphia, and New England were involved in the trade of slaves; so although the South was exclusively using slaves as an economic gain, the North also had financial benefits as a result of the existence of slavery. In the aftermath of the Revolution, slavery began to cease in the North. In Massachusetts they ruled slavery as not in concordance with the state. Other northern states like New York and New Jersey passed gradual laws saying "when a slave is born July 4th upon reaching the age of 21, they are free." Slavery was thus becoming sectional. The gradual laws were eventually let go cutting slavery more diligently. In the South, there was a discussion of slavery becoming a necessary evil. Manumission also came into process where owners had the ability to free slaves. Jefferson requested that as America expands, slavery not expand in the Southwest, but his request did not pass. The Northwest banned slavery, and in 1787 the Northwest Ordinance and the Constitution began to play a major role in the Constitutionality and legality of banning slavery.…

    • 2142 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Three-Fifths-Compromise”: Determined that each slave would be counted as three-fifths of a person for the purpose of apportioning taxes and representation.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three-Fifths Compromise

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The ratification of the United States Constitution depended on the agreement of the North and the South, and the issue of slavery was a major obstruction to this agreement. Each state’s representation was determined by the number of person’s residing in that state. The North did not want to count the slaves as part of this number because it would mean less representation for them in the government. Their argument was that since slaves were considered property, they should be equated with other chattel property, like cattle and mules. The South, on the other hand, was determined to count slaves into their population due to the high proportion of slaves in the southern region of the country. Without the support of the South, the ratification of the Constitution was doubtful, so the 3/5 Compromise was written. Article 1, section 2 of the Constitution states that “population for the purposes of representation and taxation would be determined by adding the whole number of free people, including indentured servants, plus 3/5 of all slaves”. This was also called The Enumeration Clause.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays