Preview

Competition Aspects in Mergers & Acquisitions

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
5317 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Competition Aspects in Mergers & Acquisitions
Research Paper on Competition vis-à-vis Mergers & Acquisitions

Abstract: Combination is a relatively new concept in Indian competition law. Although its roots can be traced to the erstwhile antitrust legislation, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the regulations governing combination control was put into force only in 2011. This paper thus attempts to analyse the combination regulation mechanism operating in India, with special focus on specific provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (“The Act”) and Combination Regulations, 2011 in their recently amended form.

Introduction:
The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (‘MRTP Act’) was India’s first antitrust legislation which established a quasi-judicial body for investigating cases of unfair and restrictive trade practices. The concept of combination control was not explicitly recognized in the MRTP Act, nor was it expanded upon.
Eventually, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs vide its Notification dated August 28, 2009 repealed the MRTP Act. There were primarily two reasons behind the repeal of the MRTP Act and its subsequent replacement by the Act. Firstly, with the growing complexity of industrial structure, it was felt that the interference of the Government through the MRTP Act in the investment decisions of large companies had a deleterious effect on Indian industrial growth. Secondly, antitrust policy was evolving from an anti-monopoly to pro-competition approach worldwide and Indian competition policy needed to mirror this changed dynamic.
The government of India enacted Competition Act, 2002 on 13th January 2003. The Competition Act aims to imbibe the social and economic philosophy enshrined in the Directive Principles of State Policy contained in the Constitution which seeks to prevent the concentration of wealth and means of production to the common detriment. Also the Act seeks to ensure free and fair competition in India by prohibiting trade practices which

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    This cycle repeats itself one or more times during system development and one or more times during procurement (purchase of a major end item previously developed or available commercially). For large systems, procurement follows a highly demanding DOD-funded development process and the prime manufacturer, almost by necessity, is the developer. In such cases, the competitive steps for a given phase of the acquisition process (listed above) would not be repeated during the procurement phase. Some things that I would change would be the misconception of communication within the industry during acquisition processing. The Federal Government has an obligation to conduct procurements in the most effective, responsible and efficient manner possible. Current market information is very vital as they define the requirements, so that the contracting officers can develop the acquisition strategies, seek opportunities for small businesses, and negotiate contract terms. Industry partners are the best source for this information, so productive interactions is very important and should be encouraged. The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prompt 3

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Markets have four different models which are perfect competition market, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and pure monopoly markets. Each market has its own characteristics in terms of barriers, price control, and the kind of products. An oligopoly market can be defined as a market which has a few large producers of homogenous or differentiated products. Moreover each firm is affected by the decisions of its rival and must take those decisions into consideration when setting its own price and quantity. Regulating the merger activity by governments at oligopolies markets could be economically and socially beneficial for them.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the time of 1880’s, the industries following “monopoly” were found to flourish 7 times higher than the national growth. Business leaders who wanted to achieve efficiency, started to join together in the interest of forming trusts. Those who were unable to practice businesses efficiently started blaming the trusts for building monopolies. Lobbying government was also done to hinder the success of trusts. They put allegations on trust for getting richer at the expense of people. They wanted their money made from the business to be seized. It was said that these monopolies were illegally made to increase profits by raising the prices. Keeping aside the facts to be true or not, a decade later in 1890, an act entered to prevent monopoly known as Sherman anti-trust act named on the senator John Sherman. The law was not able to clearly define the terms “monopoly” , “anti-competitive” and “predatory”.…

    • 919 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper will discuss the antitrust law, specifically the Sherman Act of 1870. A claim was filed against the NCAA by the Governor of Pennsylvania for reasons that violate this act. It will also discuss monopolies and oligopolies, given an example of how they can be good and bad for the economy.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Egt 1 Task 309.1.3-06

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Industrial regulation is government imposed regulation of an entire industry in order to monitor prices and products provided to the public. Industrial regulation exists to avoid overpricing, lack of competition and the overall taking advantage of consumers. The intended impact on the markets is to promote competition and economic efficiency. Industrial regulation also intends that monopolies and oligopolies do not control the entire market, charging high prices and providing fewer and inferior products, which in turn “harms consumers and society” (McConnell, Brue, Flynn & et al, 2011, pg. 382). These regulations reduce the market power of monopolies, therefore allowing entry into the market by the competition which then allows for substitute products and price competition. It also reduces the power of oligopolies and increases market competition and prevents collusion. The antitrust laws also help anti competition and price fixing by not allowing monopolies to develop.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shyam Kemani, Merger Policy in Small vs.Large Economies, in CANADIAN COMPETITION POLICY AT THE CENTENARY 205 (R. Shyam Khemani& W.T. Standbury eds., 1991…

    • 3041 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antitrust laws were essentially created to stop businesses that got too large from blocking competition and abusing their power. Mergers and monopolies can limit the choices offered to consumers because smaller businesses are not usually able to compete. Although free and open competition ensures lower prices and new and better products, it has the potential to significantly limit market diversity.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Objective: The objective of the program is to provide technical assistance to the Government of Bangladesh (GoB) to undertake competition advocacy, public awareness and training about competition issues. The competition…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Section 32 of the Competition Act of 2002 confers the powers over the Commission to inquire into the agreement referred in Section 3 that have been entered into outside India which have an appreciable adverse effect on the competition in the relevant market in India. This Section empowers the Commission to take jurisdiction over disputes taking place outside India if it produces an adverse effect within its territory. The mechanism for controlling anti-competitive acts carried on by persons having the location of their operations at some place in India and are, therefore, directly subject to the territorial jurisdiction of Indian courts and tribunals. Thus, it is an evident inference that where there is conduct within the country and such a conduct causes an appreciable adverse effect within the market of that country, then the Commission positively has jurisdiction to decide such cases. Also, Section 14 of the MRTP Act stated that “Where any practice substantially follows within monopolistic, restrictive, or unfair, trade practice relating to the production, storage, supply, distribution or control of goods of any description or the provision of any services and any party to such practice does not carry on business in India, an order may be made under this Act, with respect to that part of the practice which is carried on in…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    mrtp act

    • 2427 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The MRTP Act extends to the whole of India except Jammu and Kashmir. The act amended in 1974, 1980, 1984, 1988 and 1991. The act placed many restrictions on companies having assets of more than Rs. 100 crores in respect of new projects, diversification, mergers, and even in the appointed of directors.…

    • 2427 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Competition Act in India

    • 12476 Words
    • 50 Pages

    “The MRTP Act has become obsolete in certain areas in the light of international economic developments relating to competition laws…

    • 12476 Words
    • 50 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nestle India

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Indian FMCG Market is a perfect example of monopolistic competition. It is a highly crowded market with a large number of national and global players competing on margins…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is competition good for business? Why not? But competition without cooperation is bad for the nation and what’s bad for the nation is bad for the business.( Umi, 2002) “Have you ever thought that marketing your small business would be easier without competitors? The truth is that most of us have thought that way.”( Belonwu, 2013). Competition is an art and the entrepreneur is an artisan. It can create beautiful things. It depends on your concentration and skill.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The objectives of the Act are sought to be achieved through the Competition Commission of India (CCI), which has been established by the Central Government with effect from 14 October 2003. CCI consists of a Chairperson and 6 Members appointed by the Central Government. Ashok Chawla is the current Chairperson of the CCI. It is the duty of the Commission to eliminate practices having adverse effect on competition, promote and sustain competition, protect the interests of consumers and ensure freedom of trade in the markets of India. The Commission is also required to give opinion on competition issues on a reference received from a statutory authority established under any law and to undertake competition advocacy, create public awareness and impart training on competition issues.…

    • 4164 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    | 1. To Frame policyE.g.: Economic policy of socialism, Privatization, etc. Constitution of India mandates socialism. The govt. policy was also socialism. So legislature made act to regulate private persons.E.g.: Foreign exchange regulation Act 1973, Monopolies and Restrictive Practices Prevention Act 1969. But in 1991 Narasimha Rao Govt. adopted new economic policy (NEP); LPG…

    • 4465 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics