Comparing Utilitarianism, Deontology And Virtue

Out of the three theories that we looked at the second half of the semester, utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue, I think the virtue theory is the most accurate of them all. The theory says a person is determined good or bad based on their character. I think that is most accurate because if a person is constantly acting badly, then they would be considered a bad person. If a person is constantly acting good, then they will be considered a good person. Looking at the other two theories, utilitarianism doesn’t seem wrong to me, but it isn’t very accurate. Deontology theory does not seem accurate to me at all. It doesn’t sound like it makes sense when I think about it. Therefore, of the three theories, the virtue theory seems most accurate
We should not be judging people at all before getting to know them. We could be judging someone and be deciding that we do not what them in our life, and that shouldn’t have happened because we judged them too early. We also cannot only judge people based on their intentions because intentions are not always what happen in the end. Intentions are important, but actions are important also. We cannot judge a person only on their intentions because their actions might not end up being what they intended to
This seems most accurate to me because if I see a person almost always acting badly, then I would consider them a bad person. If they are almost always acting good, then I would consider them a good person. This theory seems most logical to me from the three. There is no way to view a person good if their actions are bad. It is like saying a bully is still a nice person. No, the bully is not a good person and nobody would view them that way. If the person was a true good person, then they wouldn’t be acting badly. If the person was a true bad person, then they wouldn’t act good a very much. Although, one bad act does not make a good person bad and one good act does not make a bad person good.
My thoughts on judging a person’s character are we should wait until we know the person. We cannot judge a person before meeting and getting to know them because then we would be judging them prematurely. If we wait until we know the person, then we will know how they normally act and why they do what they do. Then we can judge them based on the things they do. The way a person acts can say a lot about their character. If they are acting badly most of the time, then we can judge their character as bad. If they are acting in a good way most of the time, then we can judge them as a good