Preview

Comparing Mccarthy's Shooting The Elephant And Dog Lab

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
155 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Mccarthy's Shooting The Elephant And Dog Lab
People make many decisions in life such as, should I go to college, what college should I attend, what am I majoring in, which people should I hang out with, etc. All of these question is very important that we make every day. In making decisions there is a process that happens on how we make our final decisions. In Orwell’s essay “Shooting the elephant” and McCarthy’s essay “Dog Lab,” they went through the same process on making their decisions. Orwell’s essay was about a police officer that went through a tough time deciding if he should kill the innocent elephant that go out of his cage. McCarthy’s essay was about a medical student that studies a lot and had to decide if she should participate on a class experiment. The process is first
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Of Mice And Men Movie And Book Comparison Essay
    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Of Mice And Men Movie And Book Comparison Essay

    Typically, people these days prefer watching movies over reading books. However, it can be interesting to read a book as well as watch the movie to find similarities and differences. The novel Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck, consists of two main characters: George Milton and Lennie Small. The movie, released in 1992, focuses on the same characters’ adventures working on a ranch during the Great Depression. There are several similarities between Lennie in the movie and the book, including him liking to touch anything soft and him acting like George's child. However, there are also differences between the two, such as Lennie’s size and his mental abilities.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Of Mice And Men Movie And Book Analysis
    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Of Mice And Men Movie And Book Analysis

    The movie and book Of Mice and Men are rather similar, however there are major differences. For example, in the beginning of the book John Steinbeck starts by describing the scenic pond where the exposition begins, and the movie opens up with the scene of a girl in a red dress frantically running while Lennie and George are trying to elude men with guns. On the other hand, when George is describing their dream of owning their very own farm, the description in both the book and movie are the same. For instance, “An’ it’d be our own, an’ nobody could can us.” (Source A) is rather similar to what was said in the movie. Another example of a similarity, “ We're gonna have a cow, and some pigs, and we're gonna have, maybe, maybe, a chicken. Down…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    George Orwell Shooting An Elephant Summary
    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages

    George Orwell Shooting An Elephant Summary

    George Orwell writes Shooting an Elephant with his experiences in Burma; so story is in Burma, Myanmar. Both Orwell uses his own experiences in past and he lives in the significant era of British in history, we see high rise at historical background in the story. Orwell prefers to indirect way to express his emotions using symbols. One of the main symbols is an elephant. The elephant symbolizes British Empire. The reason that Orwell chooses the elephant, the empire is powerful like an elephant. When it dies, Orwell makes narrative sentences about the elephant. These sentences help us the elephant is the British Empire.” One could have imagined him thousands of years old. (5)” “He was dying, very slowly and in great agony, but in some world…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Comparing The Curious Incident Of The Dog In The Night-Time
    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Comparing The Curious Incident Of The Dog In The Night-Time

    The novel "The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time" isn 't just a young autistic boy 's story. Whilst it does describe the protagonist Christopher Boone 's "reality", the narrative is much deeper. The issues that surround Christopher are vital to the storyline, providing a complexity that suggests the "The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time" is far from simple. While a major part of the novel, autism is not the only theme explored. In addition to autism itself, the effects of this disorder are central to the characters involved in Christopher 's life, and is the root cause of many dramatic events. The break-up of Christopher 's parents Ed and Judy can partially be attributed to their son 's behavioural problems, which leads to more problems. In "The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time" there are two authors; writer Mark Haddon and Christopher Boone, a sufferer of the disorder autism. Haddon uses Christopher as a means of expressing the human condition - that we all struggle, all achieve and all fail…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Charles Siebert's The Elephant Crackup
    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Charles Siebert's The Elephant Crackup

    An Elephantine Analysis In Charles Siebert's article The Elephant Crackup, the author employs a nuanced and compelling rhetorical strategy that seamlessly integrates firsthand narratives, expert opinions, and emotional appeals to shed light on the profound consequences of human exploitation on elephants. Through the deliberate use of linguistic choices, comparisons to human tragedies, and a careful balance of ethos, pathos, and logos, Siebert effectively engages the reader, emphasising the urgent need for compassionate rehabilitation practices and fostering a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between human actions and elephant behaviour. Charles Siebert establishes his credibility as a firsthand narration (Kairos) using an anecdote,…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Of Shooting An Elephant By George Orwell
    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis Of Shooting An Elephant By George Orwell

    George Orwell is well known, even though he died in 1950. He was British and an ex-cop. George Orwell is a very prominent author. He is known for a few of his books, written for a variety of purposes. However, this specific essay, “Shooting an Elephant”, is written to inform of us. He phrases this essay more as a narrative, which makes it not rhetorically effective. George Orwell uses great imagery and his syntax makes it simple for even high schoolers to read through his works.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Of Mice And Men Comparison Essay
    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Of Mice And Men Comparison Essay

    Of Mice and Men is a popular short novel that was written in 1937 by the author John Steinbeck. The novella is about the story of two farmhands, George Milton and Lennie Small, who have dreams of one day owning their own farm. The motion-picture adaptation of Of Mice and Men, released in 1992, is very similar in most aspects; however, the endings of the book and movie differ from each other in a significant way. The ending of the novel Of Mice and Men includes a scene where George, after killing Lennie, is comforted by Slim, a kind man at George’s ranch; be that as it may, the motion picture does not include this scene, and this obscures the intention of the original work because the movie’s exclusion of the scene where Slim offers his friendship…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis of Shooting an Elephant
    • 796 Words
    • 23 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis of Shooting an Elephant

    Orwell succeeds greatly in telling one of his remarkable experiences in Burma. While working for the British Empire as a police officer in Burma, he comes across a elephant gone mad that in his judgment he shouldn’t shoot because the handler was on his way and there was no need to kill the expensive piece of property anymore. But in the end he felt that he needed to do a service for the mob of people that had congregated. Orwell wrote this essay 10 or so years after the events that took place in the essay. The British Empire at the time of writing was going through major changes and its imperial power was declining. So he was telling his incredible story as a way of informing the British citizens at the time of exposing the injustices and dark side of imperialism that he felt he had to right. The whole world when he was writing this essay was enduring a economic depression and were facing another possible world war. So it was a dark time not only for the British empire but the whole world.…

    • 796 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Of Mice And Men Comparison
    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Of Mice And Men Comparison

    The term friendship, as defined by Merriam-Webster, is the relationship between those who help, support, and care for one another. John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men, written in 1937, and the 1992 MGM film adaptation directed by Gary Sinise follows the story of an uncommon companionship. Set in the 1900’s, Lennie, a mentally disabled person, and his friend, George, strive to achieve a dream of living free from the bondage of others. Some argue that the movie is more appealing; others point out that the book is more engaging. Although both pieces portray a similar storyline, Steinbeck’s perspective offers a more intricate appeal.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of Shooting An Elephant By George Orwell
    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page

    Analysis Of Shooting An Elephant By George Orwell

    The thesis of George Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant” is, “When the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroys.” This sentence is found in paragraph 7, line 14. This is the thesis of the essay because it reflects on the fact that Orwell feels reluctant at first to shoot the elephant, because he sees how peaceful and harmless it is. But as the crowd behind him pressures him with their laughter and screams, he finally pulls the trigger, with out actually thinking, and he repeatedly shoots the elephant trying to kill it, in mad rampage. This scene reflects back to the part of the thesis, “it is his own freedom he destroys” because Orwell demonstrates losing his freedom to behave intelligently and morally. He doesn’t want to kill…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    "Shooting an Elephant" Synthesis Essay
    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    "Shooting an Elephant" Synthesis Essay

    Cited: Orwell, George. “Shooting an Elephant.” 50 Essays: A Portable Anthology. Ed. Samuel Cohen. Boston:…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    George Orwell Shooting An Elephant Analysis
    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages

    George Orwell Shooting An Elephant Analysis

    In 1936, author George Orwell wrote an essay titled “Shooting an Elephant”. In the essay Orwell describes a scene of a British police officer who is stuck between having to shoot an elephant. The story takes place in Burma, India where then, they were under British imperialism. Imperialism is a policy of extending a country's power and influence through diplomacy or military force. It humiliates the occupied people, reducing them to an inferior status in their own country. Analyzing Orwell’s work, I realize that Orwell feels Imperialism is not good for both the people subject to and the people of the imperial power. The fact that the main character of the story is an officer of the imperial government, but also in opposition to imperialism…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Shooting an Elephant
    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Shooting an Elephant

    Nevertheless, Orwell was deeply disturbed, as he was in a postion he did not like, and was caught in the middle where he ought to make the decision of killing the mad elephant. He was indirectly force to do this in front thousands who hated him not knowing or care that he did not want to kill the elphant but the imperialism was evil. He seem to have become a hypocrite to himself, not liking treatment of his prisoners or the smelly cages, he was uneducated felt he could do nothing even in the position he held.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Critical Response- George Orwell's Shooting and Elephant
    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Critical Response- George Orwell's Shooting and Elephant

    I class, we read a short story by George Orwell called Shooting an Elephant. It was a story about courage, judgment, and the pressure of peers. I personally did not like this story. I found it boring, pointless, and just another "hasn't -this -happened -to -you" story about nothing. However, it was very well written, and if I had to critically respond to this story, I would praise the author on a number of things.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    George Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant”
    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    George Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant”

    1. On page 517 of The Norton Reader, Shorter Edition, the first question asks, “Why did Orwell shoot the elephant? Account for the motives that led him to shoot. Then categorize them as personal motives, circumstantial motives, social motives, or political motives. Is it easy to assign his motives to categories? Why or why not…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics