Preview

Comparing Machiavelli And Prison Break

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1492 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Machiavelli And Prison Break
The media portrays a vast number of archetypes through the animation of characters. Specifically, the archetype of a good leader is continually put on display. The idea of a good leader is ancient, it has been introduced in the past by famous writer, Niccolo Machiavelli. Film adopts these same principles of the good leader from people such as Machiavelli. Characters that are successful at gaining followers and building positive relationships exemplify good leaders, whereas characters that cannot achieve these things exemplify bad leaders. Niccolo Machiavelli’s theme of adaptability to be a good, successful leader is depicted in the popular television series, “Prison Break”, through the protagonist Michael Scofield, who is adaptive: in personality, …show more content…
Precisely, a good leader knows no situation is identical, and to be successful they must adapt to different situations. Machiavelli stresses the importance of the good leader “adapting his methods to the times: a method used today may make a man ruler of the world; the same methods used fifty years from now may lead to disaster” (Machiavelli, N). Machiavelli further explains this by saying “one who governs himself with caution and patience, times and affairs converge in such a way that his administration is successful, his fortune is made; but if times and affairs change, he is ruined if he does not change his course of action” (Machiavelli, N). Machiavelli elucidates the importance of changing the way one handles different situations and being adaptable to not always tackling situations the same. Michael Scofield from Prison Break, demonstrates perfect understanding of this through the way he plans his breakouts. Primarily, in season 1 his break-out from Fox River Penitentiary was completely stealth. Michael chose to break out at midnight by effectively using the element of surprise in every phase of his plan. He carefully conducted research of the prison, so that the guards did not know him and his followers were gone until it was too late (Scheuring, Paul). Michael exhibits the qualities of a good leader in a Machiavellian society by adapting to the times in this scenario to be successful. Furthermore, in season 3 Michael is sent to a different prison where he must break out once again. The producer does an excellent job of deceiving the viewers to think that Michaels’ break out will be like the previous one in season 1 (Scheuring, Paul). However, this is not the case. Michael sticks to the teaching of Machiavelli and uses his ability to adapt to the times to be a good, successful leader. Michael chooses to break out in broad daylight while setting off a fire alarm, sacrificing the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Trying to find who you are and growing up to a young adult is a hard time for many people. Adolescence is a time between when you’re a kid and your transition into a young adult. Sylvia Plath from The Bell Jar and Holden Caulfield from The Catcher In the Rye are just two examples that can be relatable to not only each other, but to many us as well. The main protagonists from both The Catcher in the Rye and The Bell Jar compare to each other in ways some people might not see. They both feel like they are lost from everyone in society and most discernibly towards themselves, they go through appalling failures and hardships, and they also both face some sort of depression.…

    • 127 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato and Niccolo Machiavelli magnificent ideologies for leaders of the world. First Plato’s dialogue Allegory of the Cave described what would happen if prisoners were chained to a wall and could only see the shadows before them. The shadows were visuals on the wall from the fire blazing behind them. Plato stated a quote about what would happen if those prisoners were to be released out of the cave? His reasoning for this was to produce what the human natures method is of gaining knowledge. Then, Niccolo Machiavelli described in The Prince why qualities are essential in succeeding as a prince. He stated that “qualities bring either blame or praise (Machiavelli). Therefore, it is significant to suppress negative qualities and let the positive…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “I close my eyes, and this image floats beside me.A sweaty toothed mad man with a stare that…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consummately antithesis of what Plato says would assist in being a good leader and what a leader should fixate on, Machiavelli verbalizes that there should be nothing on the prince's (leader) mind other than mastering the art of war. A leader should fixate on the mechanics of war. Study it at all times. Know your opponent. War, to Machiavelli, is described as an art which needed the full attention of the designer. The only way to be head of the state and to win is to know this art. Have it thoroughly mastered not just mentally but also physically. Furthermore, prepare your mind, body, and soul. Learn how to be outdoors and the type of toll it would take on one’s body so you will not fall week during the real thing. Build one’s mind up to be vigorous and to be able to stand any additional mental strain and stress that may come during the genuine event of a war so that one could not be broken. Study how your opposing party handles their battles and their aspects of war. Learn and…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The connection between the two passages is that children cannot be trusted with private information, or in general. Children eavesdrop too many things teachers, friends and parents say. This is expressed in the readings 1984, and “The Spy”.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Recognizing Walter’s transition from protagonist to “antagonist” becomes difficult to understand through the content and storyline due to a flood of information and the lack of common knowledge about the process of cooking and selling methamphetamine. Furthermore, Vince Gilligan’s portrayal of the protagonist, Walter White, takes on the role of being an “antagonist” being perceived as a character that gets lost in greed, but Gilligan throws in phrases in episode 6 like “I am doing this for my family” or in episode seven when Walter states how “he only needed enough for his family.” But while nothing seems to go on plan, an antagonist rises out of Walter White as his initial goals derail from his initial moral values. Typically, films and television shows in the 20th and 21st century give a clear depiction of good and evil that provides the audience with a side to choose from. However, in Breaking Bad, the story’s sympathetic portrayal of Walter White uses the audience’s knowledge of his tragic situation in the beginning of the series to influence the pardoning of his crimes. This shows that our moral compass can become secondary towards our initial moral and social benchmark, and going on our own path to accomplish a goal, whether we have to become the antagonist…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ideas on the same topic always seem to differ from person to person. This holds true to the ideas of Machiavelli and Castiglione. The Prince, written by Machiavelli, and The Courtier, written by Castiglione, are both somewhat how-to guides for nobility, royalty, and princes. However, there are many distinct differences among the ideas of Castiglione and Machiavelli. Castiglione's philosophy leads down the path of a well-rounded person; a more peaceful manner. Machiavelli's philosophy is more straightforward and violent, where you should do anything and everything you have to do in order to achieve your goal. Both books and figures were of great importance to society.…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay #15 Machiavelli believed that a leader should possess the ability to heroically and decisively for the good of their country. Machiavelli’s suggestion that a ruler should be like a lion and a fox was fairly true in Europe. Machiavelli uses a lion in comparison to a ruler because he thought a king should be strong and maintain an honest image. He also uses a fox as a symbol to show how a ruler is deceitful.Catherine the Great of Russia and Elizabeth I of England were both like a lion and a fox through their way of handling problems that they confronted during their reign. Elizabeth I of England and Catherine the Great of Russia were both good rulers who had policies against peasants/serfs, foreign countries,and religion. Catherine the Great of Russia had a strong army as well as Elizabeth I of England only difference was that Elizabeth I of England tried to avoid war but secretly encouraged Francis Drake to destroy Spanish fleets. Catherine the Great of Russia used her wisdom to decide when to use her powers to benefit Russia.Catherine the Great of Russia was like a lion because she suppressed the revolt of serfs which made her look strong. Peasants serfs tried to revolt but were not successful due to Catherine the Great of Russia. Another thing that made Catherine very powerful was the Russian military. She gained a large portion of Poland by leaving conquered Danubian area. Catherine the Great of Russia was like a fox because she controlled the nobles. She had earned the nobles loyalty by giving them control of the serfs. Thanks to the support of the nobles Catherine the…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's the Prince

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages

    "The state is the highest achievement of man, a progressive and elaborate creation of his free will. The individual, the leader, the people, cooperate in maintaining it." This idea of state was put forth by Niccolo Machiavelli in The Prince, which was in essence a ruler's handbook to governing and maintaining his land. Machiavelli conjured his theories for government by basing his ideas in his belief that men, especially men in power, tend to follow the same directions, and therefore by looking at past leaders and their follies we can better determine how to run a state. "Men are always the same and are animated by the same passions that lead them fatally to the same decisions, acts, an results…. That one can foresee the course of political development by mediating upon the cycles and phases of historical events, and that essential to a statesman is not only the experience of modern events and constant study of the past. But also the ability to exploit this knowledge in actual political actions."…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philosophy is referred to as a set of beliefs, concepts and attitudes held by an individual or a group of people. It is the study of problems in general and the prescription of solutions to problems based on critical and systemic analyses and the employment of rational argument. Philosophy through the lens of Political Science does so as mentioned above in terms of the state, the governance of the state the ethics of an individual in possession of political power. Political philosophers focus on the issues relating to the state, such as political action that need or need not be taken and the general behavior of a given individual involved in politics. With the focus set on just the state, political action and violence, two philosophers have critically analyzed politics through the three concepts listed above: Niccolo Machiavelli and Max Weber. They each have their own views, opinions and suggestions that both have similarities and differences considering the cultural and temporal inconsistency between the both of them. The fact that some of their ideas intersect is fascinating.…

    • 1933 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli: The Prince

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Throughout my reading of Machiavelli, a particular selection struck me as very interesting. This comes from Chapter 17 when Machiavelli states, “Here a question arises: whether it is better to be loved than feared, or the reverse. The answer is, of course, that it would be best to be both loved and feared. But since the two rarely come together, anyone compelled to choose will find greater security in being feared than in being loved. . . . Love endures by a bond, which men, being scoundrels, may break whenever it serves their advantage to do so; but fear is supported by the dread of pain, which is ever present (Machiavelli 54). I believe this is an interesting question that would be a good topic for debate. Regarding this question, I side with Machiavelli on his reasoning that it is more beneficial to be feared then loved with regards to obedience. Examples of this principle can be seen in our world today. Laws demonstrate this very well. Laws are present to keep society in order, and with disobedience comes penalties. These penalties are what make people obey the law. Without penalties, or using the term pain in an exaggerated sense, most people would continue to break the law being aware that there are no consequences. Fear is what fuels laws to be effective.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Macbeth True Character

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One’s true character traits can be hard to read. In the case of one’s ambition and his or her movement of power in the hierarchy, one’s instinctive choices show their true character traits. Macbeth, written by Shakespeare, and Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith, produced by George Lucas and Rick McCallum, display characters’ who are merciless, savage, and courageous in the case of a shift of power in the hierarchy.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machiavelli: The Prince

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Page 71 What does Machiavelli say it is necessary for a Prince to do to "hold his own?"…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the same way, talking about his second letter that he called The Discourses, where Machiavelli talks about the different Rome empires and takes them as examples in order to a solid government ruled by one individual. He believed that all periods of time are similar, that is why he used Rome as an example to illustrate what is wrong in a government and the good things (Machiavelli 84-85). One good example that Machiavelli gives in chapter seventeen is about “How corrupt people who came to be free can only hold on their freedom with the greatest of difficulties” (Machiavelli 124). Machiavelli explains that if an individual has become corrupted, there is no chance that they could be reformed, but the only way that a person can be healed from corruption is if they use virtu because they acquire liberty to have the intention to be good and change. “[I]t happens because of the skill [virtu] of one individual who is present by chance, not because of the strength…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    political authority because while they are self interested, they are also rational(Hobbes pg. 184). He claims that the state of nature is like a state of war, and should be avoided.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays