Preview

Comparing Cardinal Richelieu's Practice of Ruler Ship to Niccòlo Machiavelli's Ideas About the Effective Exercise of Power

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2031 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Cardinal Richelieu's Practice of Ruler Ship to Niccòlo Machiavelli's Ideas About the Effective Exercise of Power
Some regard nineteenth century France to be the France of Napoléon Bonaparte and, in the same respect, it can be argued that ancien régime France was the France of Armand-Jean du Plessis de Richelieu. Upon entering the French political arena, Richelieu was thrown amidst the struggles of international diplomacy, the devious schemes of the nobility, and the disgruntlement of the common people. Similarly, the unstable Florentine Italy which Niccòlo Machiavelli familiarized himself with led both these prominent men to publish their respective works: The Prince by Machiavelli and The Political Testament of Cardinal Richelieu by Richelieu himself. By rejecting conventional morals, disregarding haughty ideals, and promoting ruthless tactics, The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli and The Political Testament became fundamental works in understanding realpolitik.# "L'etat - c'est moi,"# spoken by French king Louis XIV is an embodiment of Cardinal Richelieu's practice of ruler ship, as well as Machiavelli's theory on the necessity of centralizing power in order to establish a stable and secure state.# To achieve this great ascendancy and rule France in an effective manner, Richelieu focused on his foreign policy of challenging the Habsburg dynasty and domestically, centralizing power in France (and ultimately, laying the foundation for Absolutism in the early modern era.) Starting early in his political career, Richelieu's dealings with international statecraft highlight both the type of issues plaguing France in the early seventeenth century and the resources of determination and shrewdness which he organized to his advantage . His foreign policy of using diplomacy, backed by force only when necessary can be understood specifically through his dealings with the increasingly powerful Spanish-Austrian Habsburg family and furthermore, can be paralleled to Machiavelli's ideas on international diplomacy during times of war.# Prior to Richelieu's ascent to power, France was engaged


Bibliography: Bergin, Joseph. Cardinal Richelieu: Power and Pursuit of Wealth, (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985). Machiavelli, Niccòlo. The Prince, trans. By George Bull (London: Penguin Books, 1961). Midlarsky, Manus. Terror to Genocide: Dimensions of International Influence. 2002: http://www.isanet.org/noarchive/midlarsky.html. Richelieu, Armand Jean du Plessis. The Political Testament of Cardinal Richelieu, trans. by Henry Bertram Hill (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1964). Treasure, G. R. R. Cardinal Richelieu and the Development of Absolutism (London: A and C. Black Ltd, 1972).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli believes that a government should be very structured, controlled, and powerful. He makes it known that the only priorities of a prince are war, the institutions, and discipline. His writings describes how it is more important for a prince to be practical than moral. This is shown where he writes, "in order to maintain the state he is often obliged to act against his promise, against charity, against humanity, and against religion" (47). In addition, Machiavelli argues that a prince may have to be cunning and deceitful in order to maintain political power. He takes the stance that it is better for the prince to be feared than loved. His view of how a government should run and his unethical conduct are both early signs of dictatorship.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the mid-eighteenth century, the European was struggling to spread its power in the whole world, especially in Americas and Asia, experiencing various regional issues in economy, diplomacy, and territory with local people. Document 1 6, and 9 are dealing with the business, smuggling and taxes in Plassey, and Carribean. Document 3, 5, 7, and 8 are involving several negotiations and diplomatic techniques during the Seven Year’s war period for gaining more benefits. Document 2 and 4 are about the territory issues connecting with local people and European.…

    • 819 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's suggestion that a ruler should rule like both a lion and a fox is exemplified to very different degrees with the monarchs Isabella and Ferdinand of Spain, and Louis XI of France. Isabella and Ferdinand were strong, ferocious leaders who implemented local and state level authority impressively. They also cleverly established a guilded appearance as religious figures connected through diplomatic alliance to the Catholic church. They follow Machiavelli's suggestion to the T. Louis XI of France, tells a different tale. Although he was known as the “Spider King”, infamous of his scheming, he was cleverly created footholds in the capitalistic realm of his country. His greatest downfall was his lack of foresight, and sheepish tendencies toward reclusiveness and isolation.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the movie he was portrayed as a villain, and unfortunately that portrayal may not be too far from the truth. Cardinal Richelieu was a controversial political leader. Cardinal Richelieu was noted for his political accomplishments to include gaining control over territories in Italy, which put pressure on Spain's properties in Milan during the Spanish War. Richelieu also developed relationships with other countries in order to support France's war effort. As Osiander states, "In a 1632 memorandum, for example, Richelieu spells out his what he saw as the point of direct French intervention in the war: to make is possible to ruin the house of Austria completely, to profit from its dismemberment and to make the French kind the head of all the catholic princes of Christendom and thus the most powerful in Europe" (Osiander…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One event that made the people of France dislike Cardinal Richelieu, was the attack on the Huguenots. The Huguenots were French Protestants who were threatening France’s safety. In an attempt to raise France’s international status, Richelieu was at first willing to tolerate the Huguenots if they were loyal to France. However, the Huguenots would often rebel and show no loyalty to France. Richelieu…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Louis XIV famously declared, “I am the state,” and there is no question that he identified himself as the sole ruler of France. During the so-called Sun King’s absolute monarchy, the nobility had little or no role in or control over the French government. Instead, King Louis built the glamorous palace at Versailles and invited members of the nobility to live on the palace grounds. Most didn’t pay taxes and led an indulgent lifestyle but with no political influence. Most of King Louis’s reign was spent fighting foreign wars that also kept the nobles occupied as soldiers. The French nobility retained their status in high society under King Louis XIV but were never given the powerful political titles that were reserved for men of great intelligence.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli was an author and an aspiring political figure who had a strong influence on several aspects of Europe’s government. Due to his critical writings in The Prince, many historians see Machiavelli as a cruel and diabolical political figure whose true intentions were to gain power for himself. However, after looking further into Machiavelli’s political past, one can see that Machiavelli is in fact an intelligent man who possesses a hidden motive to write his novel. In his work, he covered several topics that were used by future city-state leaders to help them become successful. Machiavelli proves to be an astute political mind who used his political experience to assess the actions of famous princes and to write The Prince as a noteworthy…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machiavelli was a Florentine man of many skills. He was a renowned politician, author, and philosopher during the Renaissance, whose views and opinions affect the way people still think today. The Prince is his most famous work and in it he essentially states that humans are “ungrateful, fickle, deceptive and deceiving”. For that reason, a leader should rule through fear rather than love. However, what Europeans needed during the 14th, 15th, and 16th centuries were compassionate rulers. They were already frightened and disunited during the middle ages, thus adding a fearful leader to the mix would not help citizens feel safer.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Prince was written in the 1500’s by Niccolo Machiavelli, whom name became a synonym for crafty plotting. As noted, it is a political and social document, as relevant today as when it first appeared. Machiavelli’s work became thought of as a blueprint for dictators instead of a guide for efficient democratic government. The Prince does not give us all of Machiavelli’s political thinking; however, he devised this reading for the man who seeks power. It treated the most severe problem of Italy, its inferiority in political organization and military strength to nearby states like Spain and France and was addressed to princes like the Lorenzo “The Magnificent” Medici, to whom it was dedicated. As difficult as it was to read, I did not find…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism Dbq Analysis

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For instance, monarchs such as King James I and King Louis XIV believed that they had the right to decide things as their pleasure and that they were superior to others. King James I claimed that kings are god-like and are the “supremest thing upon earth”, and also “exercise a divine power on earth.” He believes in the Divine Right Principle and claims that kings can do anything they want because they are god-like. His purpose was to show how powerful kings were to the people of England. Along with King James’ opinion on autocracy, King Louis XIV claims that kings have the right to decide the country’s fate and give orders to members of the government for them to carry out. He indicates that the monarch makes decisions only and he asserts his power to the government. Furthermore, Machiavelli also idealized the concept of absolutism. He wrote The Prince, as a guide for the effective way to rule, for rulers of Italian city-states. He believed that all men were evil and would betray a ruler, therefore he claims that ruling by fear instead of love is a best way to rule and assert you superiority as a ruler. He created this guide based on his past experience as a government official dealing with the ruler of Florence, and later being kick out of the city-state. Many idealized absolutism because one can assert their power over others and control the country as they…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Prince was written by Niccolò Machiavelli while he was in exile. In his efforts to return to politics, Machiavelli wrote the Prince in order to exert the true nature of a successful leader, and once again be in the good graces of the Medici’s who were rising to power in Italy. The Prince reveals what Machiavelli views to be a successful leader. The Prince also reveals how Machiavelli views the nature of humans and how that effects how a dictator/leader should rule. Machiavelli believes human beings are selfish, greedy, easily manipulated, and incapable of self-governing as it often ends in their own demise. “[F]or men change their rulers willingly, hoping to better themselves, and this hope induces them to take up arms against him who rules: wherein they are deceived, because they afterwards find by experience they have gone from bad to worse” (Machiavelli 201). Human selfishness inhibits the individual’s ability to make rational long-term decisions thus deeming them incapable of self-governing. If given the people the right to make their own decisions, their greed ill cloud their judgment and cause them to make decisions that may not be in their best interest. If the society is not capable of self-governing they will need a strong leader and Machiavelli has the recipe for the perfect…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Louis Xiv

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Louis XIV is a selfish and greedy tyrant. He hoarded all of the authority in the country, for his personal gain. This is known as absolutism. (Popkin Par.4) He replaced many of the nobility with commoners and aristocrats who feared the king and would not object to his demands. He stated that the country revolved around him and his country. He would do anything for more power.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    General Assembly Awards

    • 2258 Words
    • 10 Pages

    FINALIZED COUNTRY ASSIGNMENTS Crestwood – 9 Israel – DISEC – Cassie Wasserman Israel – WHO – Victor Minkov Israel - World Summit – Jake Pascoe Sweden – DISEC – Adam Tytel Iran – UN Women – Sabrina Wasserman Iran – Bandung – Akib Shahjahan Antonious – Spartacus 0 Antony Cook Cato the Younger – Romans – Shawky Abdelrazzak Cardinal Ercole Consalvi – The Papal States – Congress of Vienna – Zach Brown Etobicoke – 17 North Korea – DISEC – Sophie Sutcliffe North Korea – WHO – Lexi Dnieper North Korea - World Summit – Lorina Hoxha Russia – UN Women – Caitlin Ladd Russia – UNHRC – Alice Santilli Russia - World Summit – Eric Sheppard Russia – UNSC – Vilde Bentzen Gabon – UNHRC­ – Laura Conway Djibouti – WHO – Maria Granich Ethiopia – Bandung – Hanna Nes Portugal – NATO – Natasha Matar White House Chief of Staff – Hamilton Jordon – Iran Hostage – Phoebe Price Secretary of Energy – James R. Schlesinger – Reeve Kako Martin McGuiness – Belfast – Angela Milivojevic John Hume – Belfast – Nawinda Pelling Varys – Game of Thrones – Rosiland Sweeney-McCabe Togo – WHO Clarkson - 14 Brazil – DISEC – Greg McPhedran Brazil - UN Women – Kamraan Mirza Tomkiewicz Brazil – UNHRC – Della Giguere Brazil – WHO – Norbert Villeneuve Brazil - World Summit – Akul Agarwal Netherlands – DISEC – Joseph Leslie Netherlands – WHO – Alana Rizos Norway – DISEC – Mohammed Samah Norway – WHO – Mohammed Mustafa Kenya – UN Women – Cyrus Nagra Kenya – UNHRC – Brianne Laverty Senegal – WHO – Aysha Akhtar Ceylon – Bandung – Daylan Matthews East Timor – World Summit – Iman Yousuf White Oaks – 15 Nigeria – DISEC – Hadhy Ayaz Nigeria – UN Women – Ahad Minhas Nigeria – WHO – Jacob Crawford Nigeria – UNSC – Mohamed El-Sewedy UK – DISEC – Sean Chung UK – UN Women – Ammar Haque UK – UNHRC – Alaa Akbik UK – WHO – Yusra Hassan UK – World Summit 0 Anirudh Nathan Austria – UNHRC – Aishwarya Moothan Austria – World Summit Algeria –…

    • 2258 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli: The Prince

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Throughout my reading of Machiavelli, a particular selection struck me as very interesting. This comes from Chapter 17 when Machiavelli states, “Here a question arises: whether it is better to be loved than feared, or the reverse. The answer is, of course, that it would be best to be both loved and feared. But since the two rarely come together, anyone compelled to choose will find greater security in being feared than in being loved. . . . Love endures by a bond, which men, being scoundrels, may break whenever it serves their advantage to do so; but fear is supported by the dread of pain, which is ever present (Machiavelli 54). I believe this is an interesting question that would be a good topic for debate. Regarding this question, I side with Machiavelli on his reasoning that it is more beneficial to be feared then loved with regards to obedience. Examples of this principle can be seen in our world today. Laws demonstrate this very well. Laws are present to keep society in order, and with disobedience comes penalties. These penalties are what make people obey the law. Without penalties, or using the term pain in an exaggerated sense, most people would continue to break the law being aware that there are no consequences. Fear is what fuels laws to be effective.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with the view that English successes in foreign policy outweighed the failures in the years 1511-27 to a certain extent. England managed to successfully pursue a policy of peace making in the years 1514-21 and wolsey was flexible in his diplomacy. However, it could also be argued that Henry’s chief aim, the invasion of France, was unpopular with people at the time and that Henry’s foreign policy was too costly given how little of long term value it brought to England. His allies also often let him down and put their own aims before those of England. In this essay I will be looking at three sources and weighing up the two sides of the argument.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays