Preview

Compare Utilitarian and Deontological Theory

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1830 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare Utilitarian and Deontological Theory
COMPARE UTILITARIAN AND DEONTOLOGICAL THEORIES

Utilitarianism is the idea that the moral worth of an action is determined by its usefulness. In maximizing utility and minimizing negative utility, in short it can be defined as pleasure minus pain. Deontology means duty or obligation. This theory was founded by a German philosopher, Immanuel Kant (1724-1804). According to Kant, it is the only way of making moral decisions. Another definition for deontology is that it is an approach to the justification in which priority is given to the fundamental principles (Thompson et.al 2000;364)

Utilitarianism is an act which is right when it promotes happiness and is wrong when it promotes unhappiness. Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) was the founder of this theory and John Mill (1706-1873) became the advocate. John Bentham (1748-1832) believed that pain and pleasure not only explain our actions but also help us to define what is good and moral. According to Bentham's hedonistic, utilitarianism states that we should always perform the act which leads to great pleasure. In practical how can pleasure be measured in order to be able to compare it with other acts, in order to overcome this problem? Bentham decided to propose the hedonic calcus which focuses on seven features of pleasure. These features are: • Intensity • Duration • Certainty • Proportionality • Fecundity • Purity Extent

In order to calculate the pleasure, according to John Betham, the equation could be total pleasure --> potential pain x number of people affected= strength of moral. John Stuart Mill (1706 -1873) decided to expand on the same thing stating that all pleasures were not equal and that there was a difference between the quantity and quality of pleasure. He illustrated the importance of pleasure to human happiness. Some people found pleasure and happiness in acquiring things and participating in activities.

In this paragragh am going to compare and contrast in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Deontology: A nonconsequentialist ethical theory that claims an act is to be evaluated in terms ofits accordance with a specified set of rules. (Mosser, 2013)Virtue Ethics: An ethical theory that focuses on the character of the agent in evaluating moral behavior, in contrast to utilitarianism or deontology; often associated with Aristotle. (Mosser, 2013)Utilitarianism: A consequentialist ethical theory that evaluates moral claims in terms of their outcomes and to the extent these outcomes generate the greatest benefit for the greatest number. (Mosser, 2013)I was at the grocery store checking out in the self checkout lane, and I noticed that A single mom and her 3 kids were having to take out items because she had reached her limit, I noticed…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deontology is defined by the moral obligation of rules and duties. The rules and duties are based on the correctness or principle of an action without regard to consequences. This compares to utilitarianism where the right action is determined by how the action brings about the greatest utility to the group as a whole (Boylan, 2009). Both theories disregard the consequences of that action. Deontology ignores the all consequences, where utilitarianism ignores the consequences to the individual.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bentham developed the idea of utilitarianism and that we all like pleasure and dislike pain. The idea of utilitarianism is we focused on…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bentham said: ‘the principle of utility aims to promote happiness, which is the supreme ethical value… An act is right if it delivers more pleasure than pain and wrong if it brings about more pain than pleasure.’ To help people choose what would have the best possible consequence, Bentham provided a way of measuring it. This is the ‘hedonic calculus’. There are seven elements: the intensity of the pleasure; the duration of the pleasure; the certainty of the pleasure; the remoteness of the pleasure; the chance of succession of pleasures; the purity of the pleasure and lastly the extent of the pleasure. Bentham invented this to help people weigh up and measure how much pleasure an action will produce. Bentham was interested in the ‘greatest good…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    QUIZ ON MORAL PHILOSOPHY 1. Which moral theory includes the “interests” of sentient animals (other than humans) into the moral landscape as having rights which do not simply depend on what humans assign them? Aristotle Virtue Ethics. 2. In the video on Deontology, what example does Kant use to illustrate a negative duty (which is perfect) and which cannot be modified to suit the situation.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarian Vs Deontology

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nevertheless, there are significant differences between utilitarian and deontology. Utilitarians and deontology sometimes might arrive at variant answers to the question that whether it is ethical to implement a placebo-controlled trial for the purpose of testing whether the new drugs are efficient. Holding all other things constant, utilitarians might conclude that it is correct to conduct the placebo-controlled trial if the benefits outweigh the costs, while a deontologist would argue that it is unacceptable to apply placebo to a set of people instead of efficient drugs since placebo might be harmful to their health. Different from utilitarianism, deontologists are not concerned with the consequences of actions, but rather with the question…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bentham lived in an era of great social and scientific change and unrest; he wanted to produce a modern and rational approach to morality. He was hedonist and believed that humans naturally pursued pleased and tried to avoid pain, he created the hedonic calculus in which happiness is measured with seven different elements including duration of happiness, the intensity of it and the purity of it. His theory is also known as the act utilitarianism – this is the belief that solutions to situations might change depending on the consequences of the act. He says ‘by…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many answers from many different sources for what “the good” actually is. I will be discussing a few theories that I feel have some key concepts which point to what the good ultimately is: egoism, utilitarianism, and deontology. Egoism values the desires of the individual the most, and this is most important to the individual. Utilitarianism, on the other hand, needs to be impartial in order to value each individual’s happiness equally. Deontology also conflicts with both of these other theories because it is not consequentialist like utilitarianism, and does not always benefit the individual or anyone else involved. The best solution for the conflicts between these three theories is to break them down and build a theory that can…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Modern utilitarianists have adapted the theory that you should make the greater number of people happier instead of discarding it which happened to many other theories. Jeremy Bentham is one of the more notable people to adapt utilitarianism as he had an empirical observation of happiness is the equivalent to pleasure and the absence of pain as people desire please and seek to avoid pain. He also thought that we should carefully measure any possible outcomes or consequences of an action before we decide on the choice we will make. His adaptation of the theory also changed many laws because it was thought to be to correct to consider the consequences. Bentham also created the Hedonic calculus which was helpful in determining measurements of pleasure, which can be used with the utiltitarian theory.…

    • 616 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deontology steps in where utilitarianism fails, utilitarianism fails in the idea that there are absolutely morally forbidden actions. But, in reality, even the worst actions are not always wrong, given extreme circumstances. Deontology is all about duty and moral laws. For instance, if a person does a good act, and it has a good outcome, from a utilitarianistic view, this person was right. However, in deontological view, this person is only right if the decision was made or action taken with good intent, in following his or her sense of duty and the moral laws. There is an obvious question that sticks out in this reasoning: what are the moral laws, and where do they come from. According to Immanuel Kant, the man who started…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Deontology is an ethical theory whose name is derived from the Greek word “deon,” meaning duty or obligation. Most ethical theories are concerned with what is right or good, and they often attempt to find this by applying a rule or several rules that seem to fit with outcomes that we most commonly find are "good". Deontology is a non-consequentialist moral theory. While consequentialists, such as a utilitarian, believe the end will always justify the means, a deontologist will assert that the rightness of an action lays in the intent. It is the inherent nature of the act alone that determines its ethical standing. Deontology implies that certain actions are…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Good and Evil in High Noon

    • 1373 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In contrast to this theory is Deontology attributed to philosopher Immanuel Kant. Where a utilitarian focuses on the outcome of an action to determine the ethical choice, Deontology dictates the choice, action, or means themselves must be ethical regardless of the outcome.…

    • 1373 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832), he argued that utilitarianism maximises pleasure for the most people such as pleasure and happiness and minimises suffering for the most people, such as pain and unhappiness. An act should only be done if it fulfils this requirement (Nathanson, 2016). Another aspect of utilitarianism is consequentialism, which holds the consequences of ones conduct. This impacts on the standard for judgement about the rightness or wrongness of that particular conduct (Haines, 2016).…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe Utilitarianism is much better ethical theory compared to deontology when making an ethical decision because ‘the end justifies the means’ instead of ‘the end does not justify the means’. When making moral decisions utilitarians believe each decision must achieve the greatest amount of good and decreasing the amount of bad that could happen. Deontological ethics says otherwise it tends to follow a strict set of moral rules showing an absolute approach to most decisions. These ethical theories can be said to be complete opposites when compared especially when it comes to using someone as a means to an end, consequences of decisions, and the use of the universal code of ethics.…

    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism and deontology are two moral theories that can often pull us in different direction. Utilitarianism is the ethical doctrine that virtue is based on utility, and that conduct should be directed toward promoting the greatest happiness of the greatest number of persons. This can be viewed as a contingent right. Contingent means something that could happen or come up depending on other occurrences. An example of a contingent right is the unexpected need for a bandage on a hike. The bandage is what the hiker needs and it will bring happiness to the person.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays