“Church at Auvers-sur-Oise”, painted by Vincent Van Gogh from 1853-1890, first drew my eye with its vivid color. The background sky is painted a deep, dark purple that engrossed me. The color makes a great sky, especially in contrast to the normal blue of the opposing image: an actual photograph of the Church at Auvers-sur-Oise, France, from 2002. While I appreciate the beauty of a clear blue sky as much as the next girl, I did not notice it in the image like I did the vibrant purple of Van Gogh’s image.
The next color to pop out at me was …show more content…
Of course, the image of the actual church had a normal cement sidewalk, so my mind didn’t give it a second thought. I marveled at the multi-color sidewalk. How wonderful it would be to walk upon that kind of creativity instead of a plain surface! Van Gogh must have thought the colorful road signified the pathway to a fulfilling worship service in the church. The only time I was drawn to a plain aspect of Van Gogh’s painting rather than a more colorful one of the opposing image was in terms of the grass. I was captivated by the dark, deep black grass, rather than the normal green grass of the real image. Van Gogh’s grass had flecks of a pretty blue and pale green in it; it even faded into a yellow. The actual picture of the church featured your typical grass: dull and mowed and