Preview

Compare and Contrast the structure of "Waiting for Godot" with the structure of any traditional play.

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
952 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare and Contrast the structure of "Waiting for Godot" with the structure of any traditional play.
Traditional drama, like in "Oedipus the King" by Sophocles, reflects a world view composed of a rational, well-ordered universe, a comforting system of beliefs (faith in something, someone), a stable scale of values, an ethical system in working condition. (Johnson, 2006). Beckett, in "Waiting for Godot", has turned away from the traditional drama and has an entirely different world view. This world view is marked by chaos instead of order. The universe is void - nothing to believe in but nothingness. There is no moral ethical code. There are just people existing, being only for themselves, and sometimes by themselves. (Gordon, 2002)"Waiting for Godot", is part of the Theatre of the Absurd. This implies that it is meant to be irrational. Absurd theatre does away with the concepts of drama, chronological plot, logical language, themes, and recognizable settings. There is also a split between the intellect and the body within the work. Thus Vladimir represents the intellect and Estragon the body, both of whom cannot exist without the other. (GradeSaver, 1999)When comparing the structure of "Waiting for Godot" with the structure of a traditional play, like "Oedipus the King", the following can be noted:"Oedipus the King" is a story with a clearly defined beginning, middle and end. It has linear progression. There is firstly an exposition, followed by rising action, climax, falling action and lastly resolution. In the beginning, Thebes is suffering and Oedipus is trying to save it. In the middle, he searches diligently for the truth that will save it and at the end, he discovers the truth, and Thebes is saved. (GradeSaver, 1999). In "Waiting for Godot", the story seems meaningless or absurd. The progression is circular rather than linear. The two characters, Estragon and Vladimir, arrive to stand around waiting for Godot. They keep waiting, although Godot never comes. Act two repeats the same action as Act one. The play ends in the middle and the characters are still


Bibliography: radeSaver. 1999. Waiting for Godot. [Online]. Available at: . Accessed on 15 September, 2007. GradeSaver. 1999. Oedipus the King. [Online]. Available at: . Accessed on 15 September, 2007. Gordon, L. G. 2002. Reading Godot. Yale University Press. USA. Johnson, I. 2006. Dramatic Structure: Comedy and Tragedy. [Online]. Available at: . Accessed on 15 September, 2007. SparkNotes. 2003. Waiting for Godot. [Online]. Available at: . Accessed on 15 September, 2007. SparkNotes. 2006. Oedipus the King. [Online]. Available at: . Accessed on 15 September, 2007.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A short play is usually filled with a theatrical energy of diverse anthologies. The time allotted may be only ten or fifteen minutes, so it must be able to capture and engage the audience with some dramatic tension, exciting action, or witty humor. Just as in a short story, a great deal of the explanation and background is left for the reader or viewer to discover on their own. Because all the details are not explicitly stated, each viewer interprets the action in their own way and each experience is unique from someone else viewing the same play. Conflict is the main aspect that drives any work of literature, and plays usually consist of some form of conflict. In “Playwriting 101: The Rooftop Lesson,” Rich Orloff explores these common elements of plays and creates an original by “gathering all clichés into one story and satirizing them” (Orloff as cited by Meyer, 2009, p. 1352).…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Humor is simply defined as “The quality of being amusing or comic, esp. as expressed in literature or speech.” In this paper a comparison of works one The Secret Life of Walter Mitty by James Thurber and the other is the play I’m Going a Comedy in One Act by Tristan Bernard. Both of these readings provide humor in to an audience but they are given in completely different fashion, in James Thurber’s work the most dominating of the literary elements that was used was imagination while Tristan Bernard in his work predominately used farce, although these are not the only aspects used in their work but these are the strongest in use in these stories. Humor is and always will be a well-known form literature that has successfully passed the test of time while earning many laughs from audiences along the way.…

    • 2771 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drama and Writing. Ed. X.J. Kennedy and Dana Gioia. 7th Ed. New York: Longman. 2013.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Godspell Play Analysis

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Godspell, by Stephen Schwartz, is a musical that depicts counterculturalists from all walks of life coming together to learn from a Jesus figure. The play directly quotes the stories and parables found in the book of Matthew. While the play’s parables can be explored to find their overall message of love and redemption, the play can also be observed as an artifact of the countercultural movement.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Greasy Lake

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    and Drama. Fourth Compact Edition. Ed. X.J. Kennedy and Dana Gioia. New York: Pearson Longman, 2005. 124-131.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drama, and Writing, Part 3: Drama. 10th Edition. Vol. Part 3: Drama. New York: Longman, 2007.…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    yellow wallpaper

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Drama, and writing. Eds. X.J.Kennedy and Dana Gioia. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2012. 46-46. Print.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the plays Oedipus the King and Antigone Sophocles portrays two characters, Oedipus and Creon, as rulers of Thebes. After the murder of Laius, former King of Thebes, Oedipus became leader when he successfully solved the riddle of the Sphinx. Some time later, Creon became King of Thebes as the result of his nephews deaths. "Oedipus is a good ruler in spite of his defects. Creon is a bad ruler in spite of his virtues." This essay will discuss Oedipus and Creon as rulers of Thebes.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: -Haseman, Brad, and John O 'Toole. Dramawise: an Introduction to the Elements of Drama. Richmond, Vic.: Heinemann Educational Australia, 1988. Print.…

    • 2246 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Waiting for Godot

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Playwright, Samuel Beckett, uses a play as his text type to illustrate the idea that Estragon and Vladimir are sustained but also destroyed by what sustains them. By using a play, Beckett has the ability to visually and vocally depict his message to us as an audience. By only having two acts in his play, Beckett can turn the focus toward his characters. We, as the audience can visually see Estragon and Vladimir being destroyed because they are forever waiting on stage. “Be reasonable, you haven’t yet tried” and “let’s hang ourselves immediately!” show the destroying of the two characters in their hope to have a life. However, they still wait for a chance, “I’m curious to hear what he has to offer. Then we’ll take it or leave it”, “we’re waiting for Godot,” They are waiting for the man, Godot, to give them their chance, hence the title of the play, Waiting for Godot. The playwright uses a play so that he can use both visual and vocal techniques to portray his message to us as the audience.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Literary Analysis Essay

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When the drama attains a characterization which makes the play a revelation of human conduct and dialogue which characterizes yet pleases for itself, we reach dramatic literature. – George P. Baker.…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many English teachers today pair older, canonical works with recent films that strongly allude to those earlier works--Mrs. Dalloway and The Hours, for example, or Heart of Darkness and Apocalypse Now. One pairing teachers might consider is Sophocles 's Oedipus the King with Steven Spielberg 's 2002 film Minority Report. While it would be an exaggeration to call Minority Report a futuristic retelling of the Oedipus story, the film does borrow most of the central elements of Sophocles 's play. In particular, the play and the film share an emphasis on literal and symbolic vision and blindness, a plot device in which a protagonist is told he will commit a murder in the future, and a thematic concern with fate and free will.…

    • 1827 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Oedipus the King

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cited: Sophocles. “Oedipus the King” Trans. Dudley Fitts and Robert Fitzgerald. Drama: A Pocket Anthology. Ed. R.S. Gwynn and Wanda Campbell. Toronto: Pearson, 2004. 39-89.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some of the first forms of drama come from ancient Greece. “Oedipus the King” by Sophocles is a great example of ancient Greek tragedy, “Hamlet” by Shakespeare is the example of drama of Elizabethan period and Samuel Beckett’s “Waiting for Godot “ represents the drama of the 20th century and belongs to so called “Theatre of the Absurd”. Because all these dramas come from different period of time, it's natural that they differ from each other in many aspects.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Waiting for Godot, Samuel Beckett produces a truly cryptic work. On first analyzing the play, one is not sure of what, if anything, happens or of the title character's significance. In attempting to unravel the themes of the play, interpreters have extracted a wide variety symbolism from the Godot's name. Some, taking an obvious hint, have proposed that Godot represents God and that the play is centered on religious symbolism. Others have taken the name as deriving from the French word for a boot, godillot. Still, others have suggested a connection between Godot and Godeau, a character who never appears in Honore de Balzac's Mercadet; Ou, le faiseur. Through all these efforts, there is still no definitive answer as to whom or what Godot represents, and the writer has denied that Godot represents a specific thing, despite a certain ambiguity in the name. Upon study, however, one realizes that this ambiguity in meaning is the exact meaning of Godot. Though he seems to create greater symbolism and significance in the name Godot, Beckett actually rejects the notion of truth in language through the insignificance of the title character's name. By creating a false impression of religious symbolism in the name Godot Beckett leads the interpreter to a dead end.…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays