Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Compare and Contrast the Role of Lay Personell

Good Essays
790 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare and Contrast the Role of Lay Personell
Compare and contrast the role of and function of judges, lawyers and lay people within the English courts

Lay people are individuals with no legal training from a variety of backgrounds which is said to be used to promote an equal society.
The role of Magistrates and Jurors are similar in ways of characteristics needed; for example both must be aged 18-70 and those who are in the police or have previous criminal convictions are ruled out. The selection process is however very different, the Lord Chancellor will appoint lay magistrates on behalf of the queen whereas jurors are selected by an electoral register for the area in which the court is situated and is done by a computer at the Central Summoning Bureau. Lay Magistrates are unpaid, part time volunteers whereas jurors are also unpaid but may be unwilling however failure to attend can result in prosecution or a fine. Magistrates can claim a small allowance and compensation for lost earnings. Both parties make their decision based on facts, such as guilt or innocence in trials whereby the difference is that Magistrates can sentence the defendant whereas jurors cannot. Both are used in the right for a ''trial by our peers'', ordinary people with experience of real life situations. Jurors will serve for a period of usually two weeks as apposed to Magistrates who will serve part time for different periods of time. Although lay magistrates and district judges do a very similar job there are many differences between how they work, their qualifications and employment. Lay magistrates, otherwise known as Justice of the Peace sit in magistrate's courts, generally in groups of three, whereas judges usually sit alone. 1999 there were 90, of whom about 20% were women, whereas there are an almost equal number of men and women magistrates, showing that judges are not a mirror image of trial by ones peers such as lay people. Judges are members of the professional judiciary who are legally qualified and salaried, working full time whereas the lay magistrate and jury are not paid and work part time/ a period of two weeks. Judges have practised for at least 7 years as a barrister or a solicitor. One way to become a solicitor is have 'A' levels and go onto a Law degree then do 1 year on a legal practice course, then do a 2 year training period. One way to be a barrister is to do a Law degree then become a member of an Inn court and dine at the Inn or attend weekend courses, then do a 1 year vocational training course before being called to the bar. No formal qualifications are required for a lay magistrate or jury, but they do need intelligence, common sense, integrity and the capacity to act fairly. Lay magistrates are appointed by the Lord Chancellor (on behalf of the Queen) on the recommendation of the 100 local advisory committee, judges are also appointed by the Lord Chancellor and are appointed from those who have held advocacy qualifications for seven years. Soliciters play a totally different role all together, they tend to work alongside a Legal executive with the Legal executive being the Solicitors assistants, they will deal with the more straight forward cases themselves such as preparing wills or leases and also have limited rights of audience in court, mainly making applications in the County court where cases are not defended.Barristers are the specialists of the court room. However once a barrister receives his/her certificate to practice they undertake a completely different life style. This life requires them to dress in dark black gowns and white woolen wigs whilst they advocate in courts such as the crown court. They also wear this "uniform" whilst they are in their chamber and when they are giving out legal advice on their specialist subject of higher law unlike lay people who do not require a uniform and soliciters must wear a smart suit. Soliciters will instruct a Barrister for their client, and unlike barristers will establish a compelling defence for the barrister to then stand up in court and argue it for the client. However both parties must have a comprehesive understanding of law and soliciters can also give Barristers law advice on cases of law. E.g. negligence, wills, conveyancing etc. Unlike lay people and soliciters practicing Barristers are usually self-employed but usually work from sets of chambers with approximately 20 members in order to share administration costs and a clerk. More recent access to Justice act gives solicitors the right to do advocacy so they can also appear in court as advocates but need to gain an advocacy certificate before they can do so, unlike barristers.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Scottish Legal System

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages

    * Your final task is to investigate the roles of the Lord Advocate and the…

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The work of lay magistrates includes hearing applications for bail (bail act 1976) and for legal aid. Magistrates also sit in benches of three and hear all summary offences and the majority of either-way offences as a court of first instance, that’s over 96% of all criminal cases. The majority of either-way offenders opt for a magistrates hearing as they hope for a shorter sentence because the magistrates sentencing powers are limited to 6 months imprisonment or 12months for 2 offences, and a maximum fine of £5000.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nsw Law Reform Essay

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages

    * Outline the roles of courts and parliaments in law reform and describe their limitations.…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Unit 23

    • 6999 Words
    • 28 Pages

    This court deals with mainly criminal cases but rarely civil cases. All criminal cases start off in the Magistrates’ Court and are heard by either lay magistrates or district judges. District judges are legally trained but lay magistrates are not, they do however have to be assisted by a legally trained clerk. Magistrate Courts will only hear cases that have happened in their area and can only administer punishment of up to £5,000 or 6 months imprisonment. If the crime requires more than what the magistrate can administer than the case will be passed on to the Crown Court. Jury can also move up the case to the Crown Court if the defendant asks for trial.…

    • 6999 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Koopmans, Tim. Courts and Political Institutions- A Comparative View. (2005). (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge). [24 April 2007].…

    • 2886 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law M1

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are two types of judges, superior judges and inferior judges in the UK. The superior judges are entitled to work in the higher courts such as, the court of Appeal, and the House of Lords. Whereas, inferior judges work in the lower courts in the hierarchy such as crown courts and supreme courts. Superior judges are called district judges and inferior judges are called circuit judges. District judges are full-time judges who deal with the majority of cases in the county courts. These judges are appointed by the queen and mainly deal with claims and other matters within the court. However, Circuit judges are appointed to one of seven regions of England and Wales, and sit in the crown and county courts within their particular region. The difference between both judges is that, superior judges are more experienced as compared to the inferior judges, they have a minimum experience of 20 years but inferior judge has less experience so therefore, they have to do some training. Superior judges wear long wigs and extravagant gowns; however, inferior judges also wear the same but a bit shorter. For superior judges their salaries are a lot higher compared to inferior judges.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The study proves to be a reliable and useful resource and therefore this has provided the opportunity to strongly assert to the reader, the role of legal practitioners in the litigation process and portrays how their absence can hugely impact on the outcome of the hearing. However, she needs to investigate more precisely how much lawyers differ in their level of substantive and relational expertise and the impact this can have on the litigation…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judges represent an important central role in adjudicating disputes in a fair, unbiased manner by applying legal rules and play a vital role in controlling the exercise of power by the state. Judges may leave their position by the termination of an appointment: Dismissal due to breaching judicial disciplines, resignation of their own choice or suggestion by the Lord Chancellor for misbehaviour, removal due to disability by permanent infirmity from performance of duties and retirement at the age of 70 under the Judicial Pensions and Retirement Act 1993.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, the Jury Act 1977 (NSW) also enables certain groups of citizens to be exempt from jury service such as members of the clergy and those in full time care of a sick, infirm or disabled person, meaning that often, a jury is composed mainly of senior and unemployed citizens, which is not a true representation of the different demographics of the community, as well as it’s standards. Therefore, the law greatly reflects moral and ethical standards in relation to the use of juries, as it allows an accused to be judged by their peers, however, these standards may also be narrowed down due to the ability of certain citizens to opt…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The judge’s role in the justice system is complex. This is because there are a number of tasks that must be performed…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this Essay we are going to look at the American court system. I am going to describe a court and its purpose. We are going to look at the dual court system. I will define the role of the courts in the criminal justice today. We are going to look at the early legal codes, the common law, and precedent played in the development of the courts.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some of the different types of courts in the Middle Ages were Church courts, Manor courts and Royal courts. Now all of these courts are different and have different rules. For example Church courts are lighter in sentences than Royal courts also Church courts cannot sentence death. Manor courts are dealt with charges of assault, petty theft, public drunkenness and other small crimes. Also Royal courts deal with serious crimes such as rape, murder, cutting trees etc. The way we know there were different types of courts are by artifacts, scriptures and more. Based on this it is clear that there are three types of courts and they are Church courts, Manor courts…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juries consist of a collection of residents brought together to form a decision on a case. Seating arrangements are either in a criminal or civil case, in which the assessment of evidence is present and decisions made are from facts provided. Juries aid solely at trial court level, and because they are truth locators, there is no position in appellate court since the decision established from facts formulated at trial level. Furthermore, judges listen and decide the final word of every appeal (Ehow.com, 2012).…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many may think that by watching tv shows like, Judge Judy, are an easy way to learn how the court system works. However, there is much information that can be gained from serving on a jury. For example, there are two types of trials, criminal and civil. A criminal trial is a trial held when an individual has been accused of committing a crime that is against society. A jury held in a criminal case is made up of 12 people who work together to make a unanimous decision of “guilty or not guilty” and the government must prove that the crime was committed “beyond a reasonable doubt.” A civil trial jury is a jury made up of at least six people who come up with a decision based on proof that is “more true than not.” There are also three different types of juries. A grand jury, a petit jury, and a civil jury. Needless to say, it is actually the jury that makes a decision rather than the…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Criminal Trial Process

    • 3916 Words
    • 13 Pages

    1. Describe the role of the courts in the Criminal Justice Process: (300 – 400 Words)…

    • 3916 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics