Preview

Compare And Contrast The Health Care System And The United Kingdom

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
595 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast The Health Care System And The United Kingdom
United States and United Kingdom Health Care Systems
The United States health care system has changed drastically within the last two generations, and continues to evolve. Factors that influence these changes are; growth in the population including the increase in elderly people in the population and an increase in health care technologies, and growth of allied health care professions and rising cost of individual and family health care insurances. In the United Kingdom, people started coming in for work but eventually the jobs were taken over by machine. People began experiencing exploitation, long working hours or unemployment, and poverty. The country had poor sewage systems and increased in disease. These epidemics caught the governments attention. The Public health act developed in 1848, following the second Public Health Act of 1875. After World War I, the National Health Service decided that a health care system needed to be created that had free medical treatment for everyone. The NHS had several difficulties, but over the years new technologies developed, which created better treatment for its people.
The structure of The United States health care systems are Medicare and Medicaid; these are the largest public health insurance programs. AICGS explains that
…show more content…
The United States offers fully-private systems, where the United Kingdom offers a socialized health care system. In the United Kingdom everyone has full availability to health care, regardless of how much money they have, although it is paid through taxation. “A central tax completely funds the NHS, which equates to an annual contribution of roughly $2,950 for every British citizen” (Dougherty). There is also no fee at the point of service whereas in the United States there could be. The United Kingdom has one of the best health care systems in the world and the health expenditures per capita is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The national assistance act helped reduce poverty because it gave anybody in need benefits, this was the last defence for extreme poverty. For disease the national health service was introduced. This was to improve health care in Britain. In 1948 despite opposition of some health care professionals, that insisted on working privately still, Aneurin Bevan brought in the NHS. This made doctors, hospitals, dentists, opticians, ambulances, midwives and health visitors available and free to anybody.…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Beforehand, only less than half the population were covered by existing health insurance set by the Liberals in 1911. Those who were not covered still had to pay for a doctor at a great expense. In addition, hospitals still relied on voluntary efforts and therefore suffered as a result – these reforms were successful as they completely revolutionised this old system. The NHS Act was passed in 1946 but came into practise by 1948. It offered a full range of help; free treatment from GPs, specialists, free hospital treatments, free eye and dental treatments, spectacles and hearing facilities – this would have greatly increased the overall health of the nation which boosts its success as a reform. However, on the other hand it is important to remember that this health care reform was of an enormous expense, to the point that National Insurance funds did not cover it. This therefore meant that they had to backtrack on “free for all” and even had to place charges on prescriptions, spectacles and dental treatment which acts as its biggest limitation as it slightly contradicts its original intention. However, even though this was the case millions of people continued to be treated and their health improved nonetheless which illustrates its success Right wing historians argue that the NHS was too generous in allowing to get free dentures and prescriptions, that there were too wasteful of resources. Furthermore, there still remains great historical debate that it seemed overgenerous for a country so recently battered economically by the world war. Critics similarly argue that the Labour government should have concentrated on the rebuilding of shattered industries than reforming the healthcare system so radically - Cornelli Bernett argues that the NHS was too expensive, and the government should have got the economy…

    • 3424 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two sources differ in the way they view the NHS system. Source A, which comes from a concerned Bitish citizen, criticizes the NHS system while source C, which comes from the NHS website, states that their system is an efficient one. Source C stated that the NHS system is an efficient system, probably even the most efficient system in Europe. Source C also stated that the main reason why NHS received so many bad criticism is because people’s expectation on NHS is too high, as this can be seen from the sentence “Because people’s expectation on what they should get ‘free’ on the NHS far exceeded the growth in available funding.” Source C also stated that the NHS system is actually making progress in their healhcare services throughout the years, as stated in “... the NHS is actually performing far better than it was 20 or even 10…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the reasons why death rates have decreased in the last 100 years or so is largely because of medical improvements that have been a consequence of technological advancements. These advancements in technology have allowed new treatments to be found to cure diseases that were previously incurable and deadly beforehand. This has also paved the way to new illnesses being discovered and cures being found for them, which also ties to medical improvements and the decrease in death rates. The introduction of the NHS in 1945 by the Labour government gave people, who previously were unable to access treatment for illnesses, free access to medical care when they needed it. By it being funded by the government, rather than private businesses, this has increased the quality of care for all citizens because private investors and big businesses that may have owned it previously would have only focused on a profit being fetched in through treatment, rather than actually caring for their patients to a good standard. Through this huge development, death rates would decrease as the trend shows because free accessible healthcare and treatments would be available to all that required…

    • 1237 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business BTEC, unit 1, P1

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The NHS is a public organisation, owned by the government to help people with health care, injuries, infection, disease etc. The NHS are a health care system/organisation put together to help the residents living in the U.K. They are owned by the government and the government fund them with equipment, facilities, staff etc. Also, the NHS doesn’t charge us for health care that we need. For example, they do not charge us for being diagnosed with illness by doctors, for cancer treatment etc.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Great Britain there has been a regular health plan and budget in place for years. Over the years they progress thru research as America does. They are in the high income group which is the countries that are wealthy and essentially in the GREEN, they have the funds to provide surplus of care for their citizens. This is a great example of european health care and social systems using their…

    • 772 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before reading the book The Healing of America by T.R. Reid, I was completely uneducated and unaware of the health care systems that other countries use all over the world. I had never really taken into consideration the millions of people in who have little or no health insurance at all and how much it effective them. Every country in the world devises its own set of arrangements for meeting the three basic goals of a health care system. These include keeping people healthy, treating the sick and protecting families against financial ruin from medical bills. There are four main models of health care systems that Reid describes in the book that include, the Bismarck model, Beveridge model,…

    • 1719 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hsm 310 Midterm

    • 1841 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Student Answer: The healthcare system has progressed through numerous phases, change and challenges over the past century. Before the twentieth century the healthcare system faced the challenge of a predominance of acute infectious diseases, epidemics and unhealthy work and living environment. The federal government has provided college loans to students for tuition assistance. Today more than half of the students receive federal financial aid under the Great Society program. These educated individuals provide the human resources for economic prosperity. The impact of Great Society health has been enormous. In 1963 most elderly Americans had no health insurance and there were few retirement plans that provided such coverage. The low income families had little to no access to any medical treatment unless they were in critical condition. Today everybody has some sort of access to healthcare, whether is through a private insurance or government funded.…

    • 1841 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Health care has become significant news recently, especially in the US with passing of Obamacare and costs have escalated dramatically over the recent years. Examining two health care systems, the United States and Australia’s, shows how they compare to each other. The United States and Australia share some similarities, but one considerable contrast: Australia has had a universal national health care system since 1984. Looking at the two systems strengths and weaknesses will show how each health care system benefits the citizens of each country. Showing how…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The NHS believe that good healthcare should be provided to everybody who needs it no matter how much or little money they have. All the treatment on the NHS is free to those that live in the UK however…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Britain, the Health Care System is controlled by the government. The drugstores charge different medicines for the same price, which is 6.65 pounds. Also, medicine is free for people who are under 18 and over 60. In the state-run hospital operated by National Health Service, people do not pay for seeing a doctor because they are nationally insuranced. Additionally, in the cashier's office, patients can even get their transportation fees from the hospital (government).…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the video Sick Around the World, we saw how different countries have very different health care systems than our own here in the US. What I found so surprising is that the other countries pay so little for their health care and still get the same, if not better, health care coverage that we get here. In some cases, in the U.S. people go bankrupt while trying to pay medical bills and in every other country in the video they all stated that no one has ever gone bankrupt while paying off medical bills. In the U.K. they have a government run NHS which is funded through taxes. Health care in the U.K. is also becoming more competitive as people are now able to pick where they choose to receive their health care which is now making hospitals…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Single Payer System

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Whereas; the United States has a multi payer system. Health care plan has assigned restriction on which hospital and doctors individuals in the United States can visit for medical assistance. At least 40 million people are not insured; many Americans are living in fear of losing whatever care they have, cost-savings are driving patients out of bed early, administration costs are approaching…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The major facts that will be discussed in this paper are: The cost of healthcare in the U.S. versus the U.K., the access to healthcare, health and well-being, responsiveness, fairness in financing, attainment and performance, and the satisfaction with the healthcare system. In addition to the major facts being discussed are the major problems.…

    • 1924 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a country we are facing currently facing a problem based on health care. Every country has their own way of doing things, but which way makes the most sense? Statistics show that Canada’s health care system is working for them, but will it work for the United States? Ezekial J. Emanuel, Holly Dressel, and together, Karen Davis, Cathy Shoen, Katharine Shea, and Kristine Haran, all address possible solutions to this problem. While Emanuel feels that America’s system is sufficient, Dressel, Davis, Shoen, Shea, and Haran believe there are better options. These authors evaluate the different systems based on quality, cost, and accessibility.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays