Preview

Company Law

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1492 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Company Law
AC208 Company Law Assignment

Name : Wong Kai Jun
Tutorial Group : T14
Tutor : Assoc/P Gan Lay Hong, Pauline

Company Law Assignment The law requires that directors not take corporate opportunities without the permission of the company. The first part of the essay will touch on the ambit of this duty, and then I will go on to discuss whether the law imposes too harsh a burden on directors in this regard.

First of all, "corporate opportunity" refers to a business opportunity which the company is considering or one which the company might be reasonably expected to be interested, given its current line of business. An example of a director breaching her duty by taking a corporate opportunity is given in the Compaq case. Compaq had arranged to engage Personal Automation Mart for its "GEMS" project. However, an internal dispute arose between Tan - Compaq's managing director - and the majority shareholder. This dispute prompted Tan to resign, and she brought along some of the Compaq's employees who assisted in the GEMS project to set up another company Newstead. Personal Automation Mart later transferred the project to Newstead. The court held that Tan breached her fiduciary duties by setting up a competing firm to take advantage of a contract that should have gone to the company. The above case also leads one to ponder, since directors are not allowed to take corporate opportunities without the permission of the company, can the director resign from the company to take up a corporate opportunity? Will his liability be absolved then?

The courts have held that when directors resign from a company to take up a corporate opportunity, he will breach his duty by taking up the opportunity without the permission of the company where:
1. The resignation was prompted or influenced by a desire to acquire the opportunity sought by the company or
2. it was the director's position with the company rather than a new initiative

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    596b Case Study

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The rule of s 596AB illustrates that: first of all, if the director intend to harm the employee’s entitlements, this director is definitely not allowed to engage in a relevant transaction. In addition, if the director has a plan to reduce what entitlements the employees have or entitlements recovered by a company, this director is significantly prohibited to join in any relevant transaction.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hanrahan, Ramsay and Stapledon showed that “In Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Clark, the court considered the meaning of the words “some other good reason”. The court said “ a core, irreducible requirement of involvement in the management of the company” and “every director is expected to participate in the management of company.” (Hanrahan, Ramsay and Stapledon 2014).…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Answear

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A) A shareholder could commence an action on behalf of the corporation against the director if he gets the court's permission to do so.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Youme

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages

    consequences of contravention of the following statutory provisions in this case and its related penalties imposed against Roberta: 1. Disclosure of interest. If a director contravenes the requirement in s 191 to disclose a material personal interest in a matter that relates to the affairs of the company, the court can order the director to pay a fine of up to $1100, or be sent to prison for up to three months, or both: see Schedule 3 to the Corporations Act. court can impose these penalties. 2. Improper use of position or information…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whistle Blower Case Study

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages

    54) Unless the Defendant can produce a valid resignation that meets the requirements of the Contract the contract has been breached.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages

    References: Miller, R. L., & Jentz, G. A. (2010, 2007). Fundamentals of Business Law (8th ed.). Mason, Ohio, United States of America: South-Western Cengage Learning.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Economics Quiz

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to the Delaware Supreme Court, when does the role of a director shift from being a “protector of the corporate bastion” to being an “auctioneer” charged with obtaining the highest realizable short-term value for the shareholders?…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The legal issues in this particular case are relied on the ASIC Act where a person becomes automatically disqualified from managing a corporation if the person is convicted of an offence that “involves dishonesty”. Accordingly, Mr. Schwartz has committed an offence by making (participating) decisions on behalf of the business. Moreover, he has communicated instructions to the director of the company Mr. Goodman, who was accustomed to act in accordance…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In our case, Don use his director’s power given by company constitution to nominate a majority of the board. This helps Don easier to control the company and gain voting power in the director’s meeting. Don can make his decision as the company’s decision in order to dominance of board proceedings. And Don rewarded MYCO Company (which Don own 20 percent share) a three-year contract to supply COCO, without discuss the transaction with the board. Don has breached the fiduciary duty that is to avoid conflict interest, and also didn 't disclose the transaction to the board. So Don’s conduct of breaching director’s duty is contrary to the interest of the members as a…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Study on Sears

    • 9017 Words
    • 37 Pages

    message to management, I agree with Edward Jay Epstein, who said that "just the exchange of one powerless shareholder for another in a corporation, while it may lessen the market price of shares, will not dislodge management--or even threaten it. On the contrary, if dissident shareholders leave, it may even bring about the further entrenchment of…

    • 9017 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    13. Directors of a company can be held personally liable for its actions and those of its officers.…

    • 3558 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law

    • 2193 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Facts: Mick, Keith, Charlie, Bill and Brian were directors and equal shareholder of Big Lips Music Pty Ltd. Brian resigned his directorship as a result of differences with Mick, Keith, Bill and Charlie. The others wanted to get rid of Brian as a shareholder. However, Brian told them that he would never sell his shares in Big Lips Music. A general meeting of Big Lips Music’s shareholders is called at which there is a motion to insert a new clause in the company’s constitution that gives Mick, Keith, Bill and Charlie the right to compulsorily acquire Brian’s shares for their issue price. What is the process for inserting a new clause in the company’s constitution? Can Brian prevent the new clause being inserted even thought the others shareholders passed a special resolution that that effect? Required:  Student 1 ‐ Advise the other shareholders of Big Lips Music (the Plaintiffs) what is the process for inserting this new clause in the company’s constitution. If they insert this new clause can they acquire Brian’s shares for the issue price?  Student 2 ‐ Advise Brian (the Defendant) whether he can prevent the new clause being inserted by the other shareholders and if so how? If he can not prevent it will he have to sell his shares for their issue price? Parties The Majority  Mick – Director and shareholder  Keith – Director and shareholder  Charlie – Director and shareholder  Bill – Director and shareholder The Minority  Brian – Shareholder Issues…

    • 2193 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Derivative Suit

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages

    no benefit to the company, acting in own interests, therefore, breach of fiduciary duty; consequently , acting oppressively…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages

    (a) The legal issue is can Delusions of Grandeur Ltd increases the dividend rate for preference shareholders from 7 per cent to 10 per cent immediately?…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    BEC case

    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages

    most recent foray into the realm of directors’ duties – its decision in the Peoples case –…

    • 2284 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays