Preview

Company Contracts and Doctrine of Ultra Vires, a Comparison of Uk and Pakistani Company Lawa

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
53815 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Company Contracts and Doctrine of Ultra Vires, a Comparison of Uk and Pakistani Company Lawa
PART I

AN INTRODUCTION OF THE TERM

Chapter No.1 The Term Ultra Vires

1. Derivation:

Ultra vires is a Latin phrase. It is derived from two distinct words, i.e., ‘ultra’ and ‘vires’, which means ‘beyond’ and ‘power’ respectively[1].

2. Meaning:

Ultra vires means unauthorised; beyond the scope of power allowed or granted by a corporate charter or by law[2]. It means an act which is beyond the powers[3].

3. Definition:

“The term ultra vires simply means beyond powers or lack of power. An act is said to be ultra vires, when it is in excess of the power of the person or authority doing it[4].”

1.3.1 As per law dealing with companies:

The term ultra vires in connection with law regarding companies is defined in the following way;

“A company incorporated under the Companies Act had legal personality only for the purposes laid down in its object clause. From this it was deduced that an act done by the company outside its object clause (an ultra vires act) was null and void. Neither the company nor the other contracting party (if the ultra vires act was the entering into of a contract) could sue upon the contract, nor could the ultra vires act be ratified by the shareholders, even unanimously.”[5]

“Ultra vires describes acts attempted by a corporation that are beyond the scope of powers granted by the corporation 's Articles of Incorporation or in a clause in its by-laws; in the laws authorizing its formation, or similar founding documents. Acts attempted by a corporation that are beyond the scope of its charter are void or voidable[6].”

“It is an act of a company through which the company goes out of the way to cross its limits as stipulated in the Memorandum of Association or the Article of Association of the Company. The company is not legally bound, nor can it find anyone else, with the provisions or the results of such acts[7]”.

“By ultra vires is meant an act or transaction of a company, which, though it



Bibliography: 2. Morse, Geoffrey and others, Palmer’s Company Law:Annoted Guide to the Companies Act, 2006, London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1st ed., Vol.1, 2007. 6. Hamilton, Robert W. The Law of Corporation 4th Ed, 1996 West Group Extract from JC Smith, Smith & Thomas: A Casebook on Contract, Eleventh Edition, 2000. 2. The Companies Act, 2006 (UK) 3 6. Land Acquisition Act, 1894 7 8. Representation of People Act, 1976 Websites 2. Abdul Hameed v. Punjab Bar Council, 2008 ClC 1309. At page 5 of the thesis. 3. Ashbury Ry. Carriage Company v. Richie, (1875) LR 7 HL 653. At page 3 of the thesis. 4. Dr. Lakshmanaswami Mudaliar v. LIC, (1963) 33 Com Cases 420. At page 3 of the thesis. 5. Stockport District Waterworks Co. v. Mayor etc., of Manchester, (1863) Jur. N.S.266. At page 5 of the thesis. 6. Pickering v. Stephenson, (1872), LR Eq. 340. At page 5 of the thesis. 10. Lee Behrens & Co. Ltd., (1932) 2 Ch 46: (1932) 2 Com Cases 588. At page 10 of the thesis. 11. Parke v. Daily News Ltd., (1962) 2 All ER 929: Wand M. Roith Ltd., (1967) 1 All ER 427 (Ch D). At page 10 of the thesis. 12. Horsley and Weight Ltd., (1982) 3 All ER 1045. At page 10 of the thesis. 13. Deuchar v. Gas Lights & Coke Co., (1925) A.C. 691. At page 12 of the thesis. 26. International Sales v Marcus, (1992) 13 Co Law 124. At page 30 of the thesis. 34. Nazar Abbas Jaffri v. Secy: Government of the Punjab, 2006 SCMR 606. At page 42 of the thesis. 40. Messrs Electric Lamp Manufacturers of Pakistan Ltd. v. The Government of Pakistan, 1989 PTD 42. At page 55 of the thesis. 41. Collector of Customs and others v. Sheikh Spinning Mills, 1999 SCMR 1402. At page 55 of the thesis. 44. National Engineering Services Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Steel Mill Corporation, 2004 YLR 1696. At page 74 of the thesis. 2. Official Report, 1989, Col 1245.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    company law

    • 1675 Words
    • 6 Pages

    125 (2): if a company has a constitution, it may set out the company’s object. An act of the company is not invalid merely because it is contrary to or beyond any objects in the company’s constitution.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Tony, C. & Christopher, S. 2009, Corporations Law in Principle, 8th edn, Thompson Reuters, Australia…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hanrahan, P., Ramsay I., Stapledon G., Commercial Applications of Company Law. CCH 11th edition 2010…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plaintiff brought suit under the Kansas Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) to recover damages resulting from the breach of an express warranty by the defendant. A jury in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas found in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant appealed the decision.…

    • 1693 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Australian Corporations Law

    • 2995 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Ciro, Tony, Chris Symes, Ann O 'Connell and Ted Woodward, Corporations Law: In Principle, (2009, 8th edn, Lawbook Co, Australia)…

    • 2995 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Company Law

    • 3683 Words
    • 15 Pages

    [ 28 ]. U.P. Mathur, ‘Emerging International Laws: corporate Law’ Chartered Secretary Vol. XXXIV, no.4, Oct. 2008: 891.…

    • 3683 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Case Study

    • 2274 Words
    • 10 Pages

    [ 11 ]. Evans & Son (Portsmouth) Ltd v Merzario Ltd (1976) 2 ALL ER 930, [1976] 1 WLR 1078…

    • 2274 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    LIS PENDENS

    • 2113 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Cited: f. Minakshi Saini v. Gurucharan Singh Sharma (2002) 2 Punj LR 439, 441 (HC).…

    • 2113 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The identification doctrine is the traditional method by which companies are held liable under the principles of the common law. According to this theory, the solution for the problem of attributing the unlawful acts to a corporation for offences that require intention was to merge the identified individual with the corporation. For the purpose of establishing corporate liability, a company may be responsible for the wrongful acts of living persons although it is an artificial entity which cannot act and think by itself. And by what Viscount Haldane noted: “A corporation is an abstraction. It has no mind of its own any more than it has a body of its own; its active and directing will must consequently be sought in the person of somebody who for some purposes may be called an agent, but who is really the directing mind and will of the corporation, the very ego and centre of the personality of the corporation.”1 , the attribution then has depended on the “directing mind and will”.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Salomon Casestudy

    • 3718 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22 is a landmark UK company law case. The effect of the Lords' unanimous ruling was to uphold firmly the doctrine of corporate personality, as set out in the Companies Act 1862, so that creditors of an insolvent company could not sue the company's shareholders to pay up outstanding debts.…

    • 3718 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Under common law, ultra vires describes acts attempted by a corporation that are beyond the scope of powers granted by the corporation's objects clause. Company may only enter into transactions to the extent that it is permitted to do so by its objects clause which is specified in its Memorandum of Association. Any action not in accordance with these objects is ultra vires. Any contracts that are ultra vires are void and unenforceable against the company.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Constance

    • 10101 Words
    • 30 Pages

    All of these elements are import to the formation of a valid contract as if one of the elements was missing; the court can render the contract void ab initio. In order words the contract would be considered not valid from the very beginning when…

    • 10101 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2012IndlawSC461

    • 19573 Words
    • 52 Pages

    R. K. Sabharwal and Others Vs State of Punjab and Others (Referred) 1995 Indlaw SC 1756…

    • 19573 Words
    • 52 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Food Corporation of India

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Industrial Tribunal, Asansol dated 9th June, 1999 whereby the Tribunal answered the reference under Section…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The theory of lifting of corporate veil cannot be ignored in the circumstance wherein fraud, oppression and misconduct etc. required to be detected by the court. These are the circumstances when the court will lift the corporate veil of a company with the view to examine the actual persons who stand behind it. However, it is at the discretion of the court whether to lift the corporate veil of incorporation or not, because it depends upon the circumstances, but in some situations it is highly desirable for the court to pierce the corporate veil.…

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics