Preview

Columbus Dbq

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
637 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Columbus Dbq
In the year 1492, explorer Christopher Columbus sailed from Spain to what he believed to be India. That is a fact which cannot be disputed. However, it is often the case that historians are biased in their writing and add their own personal beliefs and interpretations into accounts of what happened. An example of this is historian Davis E. Stannard’s controversial book, American Holocaust: Columbus and the Conquest of the New World. Stannard uses facts to support his belief that Columbus and the explorers to follow in his footsteps are responsible for a mass genocide of the Indian peoples. Columbus’s captain’s log does much to contradict Stannard’s views. Columbus states that he wishes for “…the natives to develop a friendly attitude toward us [the Spanish explorers and settler].” Columbus wants no harm to come to the Natives and makes sure that trade between the natives and his men is not unfair. He may have been a bit misguided with his attempts to covert the natives to Christianity, but he himself writes that “…they are a people who can be made free and converted to our Holy Faith more buy love than by force.” Columbus does not want to bring any sort of harm to the Natives, and believes “…that in all the world there cannot be better or more gentle people.” The impression one may have of Columbus solely from reading this document starkly differs from the view of Columbus that Stannard emphasizes. Bartolomé de Las Casa’s History of the Indies sheds a light on the cruelties that the Spanish were not just capable of, but committed on a day to day basis. De Las Casa helps support Stannard’s thesis and showcases the horrible deeds performed by the Spaniards often. The Spanish soldiers would slaughter the Natives “…like sheep in a corral.” They would often place bets to measure their strength, such as who could cut a Native in half with a single blow, or slice of their heads the quickest. They has no mercy, and made sure to “…prevent Indians from daring to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    "American Holocaust" by David E Stannard was first published and distributed in 1992, the same year that celebrated the quincentenary of the discovery of America by Christopher Columbus. The release date would not have been decided upon by happenchance, but would have been part of a well thought out marketing strategy to take best advantage of the five hundredth anniversary of American 'civilisation '. The book is highly controversial in its choice of theme, in that it shows the American people of the time as a barbarous, murdering race, which, at its zenith of policy making, instigated a deliberate tactic of extermination and genocide against the native Indian tribes by the leaders of the new United States, such as Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson. Americans of today are taught to revere the leaders of the past, to elevate their memories to almost mythical status, to see them not as mortal men but as nearing the level of demi-gods. For someone to portray their iconic figures of this time in any other way than civilised and beneficent, for a large percentage of the modern day United States, would be as a minimum seen as disrespectful to their memory and for the majority would be seen as bordering on blasphemous and seditious dissertation. It is also shown in this book that the everyday common folk in eighteenth and nineteenth century America, although not necessarily direct advocates of a genocide policy, allowed it to happen, either with the excuse of the soldier when following orders of the slaughter of natives or by the malaise of the man in the street that is seen as guilty by his own inaction. This also would not have pleased 1990s Americans, being told that their direct ancestors were as guilty as the perpetrators of these heinous crimes, even if they had had no direct effect on the outcome. Even one of their favourite authors, L. Frank Baum, author of the Wizard of Oz is shown as being a radical Indian hater and exponent of racial cleansing who urges the…

    • 1126 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Christopher Columbus was terrible man. When he landed in America he captured slaves and made do terrible things. Columbus thought it would be easy to conquer simply because when first encountered the Indians they were naked so he figured it easy to conquer. In the meanwhile during the slave times when…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the moment Columbus was greeted by the natives, he immediately lost all respect towards them. Their nude bodies were defined as a lack of knowledge, skill, and religion (DeWitt). Columbus wanted to spread the word of Christianity among the Native Americans and at the same time he saw a source of easy profit by enslaving the Indians. Not once did it come to Columbus mind that these lands were not his to take but rather began to rename these islands when he sailed back home he had the entitlement of being “the founder”. During his first voyage, Columbus did not do anything incriminating against the Native Americans because he simply analyzed their culture. When he sailed back to Spain, he returned with many new items as well with kidnapped…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Columbus can be looked down upon for multiple reasons. He was welcomed to the land he “discovered” with open arms from the Natives. He managed to repay them for their hospitality by having his men rape, torture, and kill them on his command. The surviving Natives were…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When discussing the importance of Spanish alliances, it is important to discuss Matthew Restall’s interpretation of “the myth of the white conquistador”. A common myth in regards to the Spanish Conquest is that the Aztecs were conquered by a small group of white Spanish men. Within Restall’s book titled “Seven Myths of the Spanish Conquest”, he debunks the myth of the white conquistadors. Restall’s argues that “there is no doubt that the Spanish were consistently outnumbered by native enemies on the battlefield. But what has so often been ignored or forgotten is the fact that Spaniards tended also to be outnumbered by their own native allies. Furthermore, the invisible warriors of this myth took an additional form, that of the Africans, free and enslave, who accompanied Spanish…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The author of the primary source titled “A Short Account of the Destruction of the Indies” is Bartolomé de las Casas, a Spanish colonist, social reformer and Dominican friar from the 16th-century. He became the first resident Bishop of Chiapas, the first officially appointed Protector of the Indians and was also appointed an officer of the King of Spain in the New World. Based on these positions he held, it could be acknowledged that De Las Casas was higher up on the hierarchy than most of the population. After he held his role as an officer for the king, he was given an estate with native laborers who were who were forced to work for him. Casas had a revelation when he listened…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “From the fact that the Indians are barbarians it does not necessarily follow that they are incapable…” (de Las Casas 3). In For the Record, it starts off right away in this section of how the Europeans while not sure of what to make of the Indians they knew that these were not the savages as some had described. De Las Casas goes on to describe of a people that were both loyal and committed to the community and to their fellow man. De Las Casas main adversary, Gines Sepulveda, failed to see the parallel in the fate of the Spaniards at the hands of the Romans and Caesar Augustus. “Now see how he called the Spanish people barbaric and wild” (de Las Casas 3) demonstrates the same philosophy of the thoughts of Europeans as they encountered the Indians. Shall those that are fearful for the loss of all they have worked for not fight back and retain what is rightfully theirs. The Indians, especially the Aztecs had built cities, established political and economic organizations and created richly diverse civilizations. In The Jesuit Relations they recount the gratitude shown to the hospital nuns “The Savages who leave the hospital, and who come to see us again at St. Joseph, or at the three Rivers,…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Columbus was only doing what any other person under the ruling of a king and queen would have done back then, to serve and please them in any way possible. He wanted to show himself to his king in queen. Christopher of course is known for discovering America, but on the way there he did things that are frowned upon now. On his discovering he made the Natives into slaves, forced them to as he please or they would get punished. Columbus should not be bashed upon for his prejudices and brutality, back then it was all around the world and everybody was doing it, it wasn’t a wrong thing at this time.…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The myth is that the conquistadors conquered the America’s relatively quickly in a sovereign effort but Restall explains that the Spaniards had a lot of help from the Natives and African’s and the “completion” of conquest was anything but; as mass portions of the land remained unscathed by the conquest. Restall effortlessly explains how the conquistador myths of superior communication between the Spaniards and Natives were just as fabricated as the modern misconception of inferior communication by historians. The communication between the two, or lack thereof, fell somewhere between both myths. Restall uses his concise writing style to explain the resilience of the Natives, debunking the myth of Native desolation and how the myth of superiority derives from Eurocentric beliefs of racial dominance which lead to racist ideologies that “underpinned colonial expansion from the late fifteenth to early twentieth centuries.”…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    From the aspect of the native Americans that Columbus “discovered,” his arrival started the destruction of the native peoples (Gray 1). This natural world he discovered would soon be corrupted by the European invasion of the New World. What Columbus mistook for ignorance from the indigenous was actually just a different, unpretentious way of living in which the natives were quite comfortable. “’They were well fed and well housed, without poverty or serious disease. They enjoyed considerable leisure… and expressed themselves artistically…They lived in general harmony and peace without greed or covetousness or theft’” (4). From the evidence we can collect, it seems as if the natives were not without fault as the prelapsarian myth suggests, but they were content before Columbus and probably would have lived in prosperity completely satisfied without Columbus (4). It needs to be well understood that Columbus is a historical figure, not a historical…

    • 2522 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The natives once greeting the new comers to their island were very polite. Some of the natives thought of Columbus as a messenger from god, a savior. Soon enough Columbus would realize this and take advantage. He sought to take over all remaining money and recourses from the Native Americans. But not only did he have to take away all of there personal items he had to take their faith. Beyond all of the wealth, Columbus decided to convert all natives into Catholicism. In fact it had turned out to be Columbus’s plan from the beginning. On the day of arrival on October 12, 1492 he wrote, “They should all be good servants…I our lord being pleased, will take hence at the time of my departure” As clearly shown Columbus had a cruel and dictator like mind to turn all natives into his servants or…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Christopher Columbus is a man who is known in society simultaneously as a hero and a villain of his time. What if the world had to pick only one, what would it be? Many new studies and scholars believe that Columbus was the villain of his story not a hero as past information would lead us to believe. Past documents were all written from Europe’s point of view, this lead to extremely biased documents because Europe was the side to profit unlike the Native Americans. Columbus was the antagonist of the new world due to how he forced the natives into slavery, he raped and robbed the natives he found, and how he slaughtered the natives if they could not collect enough gold.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Questions for Ap Us History

    • 3857 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Columbus used Christ as an excuse to continue his cruelty towards the Natives. The only thing that was pure about him was his seamanship.…

    • 3857 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    With the Spanish conquest in Latin America came many accounts from both Spanish and indigenous writers. These primary sources are not only useful because of their content, but also because of their omissions. That is to say that the discrepancies found among writers of different class, race, or political position, are expressive of their individual biases. Analyzing what these variations are and why they exist allows for a deeper understanding of the history of this colonial period. Especially in understanding the opinions and perspectives of one group upon another, and how these perspectives are perpetuated. The contrasting accounts occur not only between the conquistadores and the indigenous people, but also within the ranks of the Spaniards.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When Historians understate the faults of columbus, rather than condemn him, he is given praise for his discovery of America. I agree with the author for saying that “... but an ideological choice. It serves- unwittingly-to justify what was done”, because instead of giving all the facts of what really happened, historians give the facts that serve the common interest of the people.…

    • 63 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays