Preview

Cola Wars Continue

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
915 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cola Wars Continue
1. Is the soft drink industry profitable? If so, how much & why?
The soft drink industry is very profitable. It is more profitable for the concentrate producers than for the bottlers. Exhibit 3 clearly indicates how much this industry is profitable to the concentrate producer as compared to the bottlers. This industry as a whole generates positive economic profits. The other reason why the soft drink industry is profitable is: * Bottling Network: Coke and Pepsi have agreements with existing bottlers which prevents it from taking on new competing brands. So no scope for future competitors due to high capital costs in setting up a new plant. * Advertising: Huge advertising costs by Pepsi and Coke which cannot be matched up to. * Brand Image/Loyalty: It is virtually impossible for a new entrant to match this scale in the market. * Retail Distribution: Significant margins of 15-20% for the shelf space. New entrant finds it hard to convince the retails for this space. * Price Wars: New entrant does not stand a chance due to the large scale production of Pepsi and Coke. * Commodity Ingredients: Basic commodities are Sugar,Additives,Colour,Flavour.The producers have no say over the pricing hence the suppliers are weak in this industry due to alternative such as HFCS in sugar prices go up.
Soft drink industry diversifies itself by offering substitutes to shield them from competition.

2. Compare the concentrate business to the bottling business in terms of profitability and level of vertical or horizontal integration?
The concentrate business is highly profitable as compared to the bottling business. Firstly, there are a higher number of bottler’s as compared to the concentrate producer’s which leads to competition of the bottler’s to get a contract with the big 2 of the industry. This leads to reduced margins in the bottling section. Secondly, huge capital cost to set up a bottling plant whereas the capital costs required in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my view concentrated products are more profitable then the bottle products or bottle business is because of the reason that high quality material is used in it. The concentrated products are considered to have less superior material as compared to the bottled one, which means that there is less quantity mixed with water which gives nearly the similar taste but still you can easily differentiate. A lot of restaurants promote the fountain pops or concentrated products and bottled have high quality material and less mixture.…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    cola wars continue

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The soft drink concentrate industry has been very profitable for over 100 years. The reason can easily be found by analyzing the concentrate industry using the 5-forces model.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pepsi Co. and Coca Cola, both are very well known multinational companies. They are so famous that they perhaps don’t need any introduction since almost everyone knows basic info about these companies and their widely used products. Both of these companies have been dealing in the production of flavored waters, plain drinking water and soft drinks for decades now and have always been each other’s competitors in almost all the mainstream products they have been producing.…

    • 1930 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Essentially the case discusses about the rivalry of Coca-Cola and Pepsi throughout the years from the beginning, and how they manage to come up with a more lucrative way to establish more market share. The case mentioned the reasons profitability of the soft drinks industry. The reasons for this profitability are:…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The barriers are high. They can be up-front advertising, R&D cost, bottling lines equipment, and brand awareness. Firstly, megabrands such as Coke and Pepsi already take about 60% market share, left fierce competition to the other brands. Secondly, On supply-side economies of scale, the megabrands such as Coke and Pepsi already take about 60% market share and the larger volumes of products to spread fixed cost over more units. Thirdly, on demand-side benefits of scale, the impact of brand reputation is huge, for customers are more willing to buy products of megabrands. Coke and Pepsi spent $244,000 and $140,000 on average each year in 2008 and 2009,which could be an unaffordable up-front cost for new entrant.…

    • 504 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Five Forces (Coke Wars)

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The soft drink industry can be described as a Duopoly since Pepsi and Coke are the two firms competing. The market share of the rest of the industry is too small to be a factor. The competition between the companies has never…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Want to maintain exclusivity with pepsi and coke so would want to engage in price war…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Coke and Pepsi

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Threat to entry is low because Coca-Cola Company, PepsiCo, and Cadbury Schweppes control 90.1% of the market share; 44.1%, 31.4%, and 14.7% respectively.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cola Wars

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are great barriers to entry when trying to dive into the soft drink industry, and because of this companies who have a competitive advantage will make it rather difficult for a new competitor to enter the market. Brand Equity is the first of many barriers, because large companies like…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cola Wars

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are some barriers for new entering concentrate producers. First, existing bottlers in the soft drink industry may not agree to bottle the new entrants especially if they have contracts or partnership with other companies. Second, the brand recognition among consumers requires investment in advertising and other promotional activities. Create a brand image takes years and the potential returns may be earned in long term. New entrant needs to have financial stability to stand in the market over a long period of time.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The competition within the $74 billion carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry has been remarkable ever since Coca-Cola was formulated in 1886, and further intensified when Pepsi was introduced in 1893. Ever since then, the CSD industry has been dominated by these two companies, with Coke taking the lead in the early stage, followed by Pepsi doubled its market share between 1950 and 1970 by offering its concentrate at a lower price than its competitor. The CSD industry has been profitable historically due to numerous reasons. Firstly, in the world’s largest market for CSD products, consumption had been growing at a steady rate of 3% annually from 1970 to 2000 in the U.S., marking a high growth stage in the industry life cycle (Appendix B). This allowed both Coke and Pepsi (C&P) to achieve annual sales growth of around 10%, while competing head-to-head against each other and other smaller CSD producers. Competition between C&P reinforced their brand image, as the increase in marketing efforts could be transferred into profit and sales growth when the overall demand was increasing in a growing industry. However, the increasing industry volume was largely obtained by C&P, leaving other smaller firms vulnerable with stagnated growth opportunity. Secondly, according to Porter’s Five Forces analysis in Appendix A, high barrier for new entrants, low bargaining power of suppliers of both concentrate producers and bottlers, moderate buyer’s bargaining power and low degree of threats of substitutes prior to 2000, have been favorable to the high profitability and growth of the CSD industry. In terms of concentrate producers, the manufacture process involves little fixed costs and capital investments. This ensures high level of gross margin for them and frees up funds for marketing related expenditures. As the industry became more consolidated, large firms such as C&P gained pricing power over bottlers through master price contracts. For bottlers, even though heavy capital…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cola Wars Continue

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Soft drink industry is profitable because the industry has concentrated revenues between 2 major players and it is virtually impossible for a new player to compete with the key players. The industry giant's wield power over the retail outlets. Convenience stores, vending machines, fountains are widely distributed and hence they don't have the power to bargain over pricing issues and they also contribute to about 80 of the sales. This ensures that the companies quote a maximum price and still have the final say in the matter.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cola Wars Case

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Threat of new entrants is low and there are multiple high barriers to entry. Despite the low cost of establishing a concentrate production plant, the producers have to develop exclusive relations with bottling plants and support them in marketing research, advertising and setting up distribution channels which is difficult for new entrants and require huge capital infusion.…

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The concentration producing industry has one buyer and through its value chain. Instead, costs for advertising, promotion, market research, and bottler relations were significant. On the other hand, bottling industry is the mid-way player in the soft drink industry. There are two suppliers and one buyer involved in its value chain (Exhibit 1).…

    • 1931 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    5. Strong barriers to new entrants: - Amount of capital investment require - Exclusive territories in distribution channel - The access to retail channel s…

    • 5634 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays