Preview

Civil Liberties History

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2698 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Civil Liberties History
A History of American Civil Liberties

A History of American Civil Liberties

The United States of America has a colorful history that much like an elaborate tapestry, is formed of events and advancements which make up its past. Each historical incident has contributed to the melting pot of culture and also the future of Americans. The history of civil liberties in the United States has significantly shaped our modern-day society. This paper explores the monumental occurrences of civil liberties before the 1930’s and after, through specific constitutional amendments, and shows the necessity to protect these rights as they are essential to the workings of a democratic government. I argue that civil liberties, while they
…show more content…
For example, habeas corpus has evolved throughout history to become an institution within the civil liberties guaranteed by the Constitution for all Americans. The term habeas corpus is Latin and translates to having the body (Cornell University Law School, 2010). The writ of habeas corpus serves as an important examination on the manner in which state courts pay respect to federal constitutional rights. Habeas corpus is akin to any other civil liberty, which cannot be reduced by the federal government (Levin-Waldman, 2012). The writ of habeas corpus is the fundamental instrument for safeguarding individual freedom against arbitrary and lawless state actions (Cornell University Law School, 2010). Habeas corpus prevents individuals from being arrested and held without cause. Without habeas corpus, political prisoners could be detained indefinitely. Ironically enough while America was attempting to define its own power, the foundation for habeas corpus during wartime was built on English tradition (Levin-Waldman, 2012). Just as the Parliament struggled against the authority of the British Crown, the citizens of the United States likewise struggle against governmental …show more content…
Habeas corpus and the war on terror have only grown increasingly relevant as days pass. One of the more well-known uses of habeas corpus stems from the September 11, 2001 attacks against the United States. It was on the wake of this historical tragedy that President Bush not only launched a war on terrorism, but the USA PATRIOIT Act of 2001 was passed. As a wartime measure, the PATRIOT Act allowed federal authorities to arrest and hold suspected terrorists without filing formal charges. Individuals detained on suspicion of terrorism were not entitled to an attorney (Levin-Waldman, 2012). In Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004), the Supreme Court ruled the prisoners had limited rights at his or her disposal with which to challenge the enemy combatant characterization (Foley, 2007). The debate over habeas corpus has erupted in an emotional time of healing for United States citizens. What is difficult to grasp is that in the midst of tragedy, in the center of emotional turmoil, in the middle of a nation full of questions, habeas corpus is a civil liberty, like many others that desperately required clarification in a changing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The writ of habeas corpus is when you get arrested and you say “writ of habeas corpus” to be brought to a judge so he could tell you why you’ve been arrested. If there is no reason to be arrested, then, you are free to leave. It was made for people who didn’t even know why they were sent to jail. They just got arrested one day and didn’t know what they did wrong.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    POL 201 Entire Course

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page

    POL 201 Week 5 Final Paper Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    POL 201 Final Paper

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will be deliberate on the history of Habeas Corpus and how it has matured over the years. I will describe the beginning of the Habeas Corpus and the position it takes part in the U.S. and what recent act is being used. The United States Constitution must be more effectively unified into the Guantanamo methods to give equal civil rights to inmates despite what their nationality maybe, but to also have more cordial ways of reviewing obstructive servicemen to absolutely verify if they really should be treated as extremists that we should fear.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American Constitution, seen by Americans as guiding light and bedrock of civil rights and democracy is as Robert A. Dahl argues not so democratic and does not guard the rights of individuals. P.18 Dahl places his work asking fundamental questions as to the use and application of the constitution in the modern world, not as an attack as Gordon S. Wood from New York Review of Books clearly states on the front cover. Dahl merely and humbly is asks Americans to deeply reconsider their much loved constitution. P.122 The work is extremely relevant as it delivers an extremely bold insight into this sacredly held text.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The war on terror presents an unpredictable challenge for the United States. Throughout history, the motivation of man’s self-interest has concluded in the domination of those with little or no power. Habeas Corpus is written in the constitution as a right of the people and should be a safeguard to protect all accused persons, but many presidents have found ways not to enforce the right. In history the writ of habeas corpus has been challenged by many president from Lincoln to most recently Bush with abuse of power by the president. I will exam whether the president goes against the constitution to protect the safety of its citizens in a time of war or is it an abuse of power because the president is the commander and chief. Is the president acting on behalf of the people or is it a personal agenda.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper will prove that civil liberties, in America, during times of war, should not be suspended. This paper will prove this point by discussing the impact of the Japanese internment camps in the 1940’s, after the bombing of Pearl Harbor, and more contemporary examples such as the Patriot Act that occurred after the 9/11 attacks. However, the main case examined will be the Japanese internment camps.…

    • 4012 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Habeas corpus is derived from the Latin term “you have the body” which is the opening terms of a legal writ (Merriam-webster.com, 2013). Habeas corpus is a legal writ that a person or prisoner can use when they are being detained by the law illegally. A prisoner has the right to know the charges that he or she is being held for and they also have the right to a trial by a jury of his or her peers (Lobban & Halliday, 2011). Habeas corpus is the actual legal action that commands the law (police or military police) to have a court inquiry as to why the detainee is being detained (The Characters of Freedom, n.d.). If the person is being detained for insufficient or unjustifiable reasons the court can order the release of the prisoner. So basically putting it, Habeas corpus is identified as a legal safeguard that protects people’s individual rights and not being illegally imprisoned (A Constitutional History of Habeas Corpus, 1982).…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    We have heard in high school and news about Habeas Corpus and War on Terror, but what does those terms really mean? Habeas Corpus is an act that was established in 1679 by England’s Parliament to give prisoners a fair trial. The War on Terror was established on 9/2011 to bring war against Afghanistan for terrorizing the U.S. In this paper, I will further discuss Habeas Corpus and War on Terror and how the two came into terms with each other within the United States.…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The English Bill of Rights precedent for other governments led the idea of unalienable rights to become a hot topic. Citizens under the French and British monarchies believed that “The promise of those rights can be denied, suppressed, or just remain unfilled, but it does not die (Hunt, 175).” Therefore, our rights still exist even if our government suppresses them. Those rights will always be there no matter how much the government tries to belittle them. The uprising of peoples’ belief in their own rights spurred the creation of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The quest for freedom was why America was established. However, as the founding fathers began their journey towards freedom from English rule, they realized true freedom was impossible in order to maintain a civilized society. This resulted in the founding fathers creating a government that evenly distributed the power to make and enforce liberty; a realistic form of freedom. This government included three branches; legislative, executive, and judicial. The legislative branch is responsible for making the laws, the executive branch approves them, and the judicial branch enforces them. All of these leaders were chosen by the people to ensure the liberty of the citizens instead of allowing anarchy caused by true freedom.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Within a democratic society citizens obtain a specific set of civil, social, and economic rights which others are not entitled to in others countries. World War II was a significant event in history when the United States went to war for its freedoms. During WWII, American’s feared for their safety and for the continuation of these civil liberties due to Hitler’s fascist minded Nazi regime. In Four Freedoms by Franklin Roosevelt, the importance of why we fight for our U.S. freedoms is discussed. Roosevelt refers to the four freedoms as: freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom from want, and freedom from fear. He also relates these liberties to the idea of democracy and why we must help our allies in the…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Civil Liberties Definition

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Civil Liberties are a negative impression an individual’s freedom. They ensure essential rights and freedoms to the American individuals by confining the administration's power, which is recognized inside the Bill of Rights and the Constitution. For instance, by ensuring American natives the privilege to rehearse their decision of religion. This is found within the First Amendment of the Bill of rights. By ensuring American natives this freedom, it enables Americans to have the liberty from the administration's activities, which averts government experts to meddle with subject's decision of religion.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    citizens “liberty” from restraints/actions enforced by the federal or state government(s). Common examples include the freedom of religion, which means that the government cannot legally interfere with (or dictate) a citizen’s choice of worship/religion, and the right to property, which prevents human beings from acquiring or trading items already owned by another individual (civil liberties). Affairs such as Marbury v. Madison or the Civil Liberties Act of 1988 famously tested our civil liberties by establishing the procedure of “judicial review” and compensation for the violated liberties of lawful citizens from previous events in U.S. history. Even though civil liberties and civil rights have many similarities, history has proven that they are two very different concepts based on the U.S. constitution, legislation, and various landmark court…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Following the 9/11 incident, President Bush established a military order for the imprisonment, management and judgment of noncitizens in the war against terrorism. President Bush’s law contravened some of the most critical national and international human rights acts such as military Courts Martial and the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the Geneva Conventions. Furthermore, the military order denied detainees the right to a speedy trial and habeas corpus. Although the Supreme Court found this move was unconstitutional, it exemplifies the current scenario, in the US, with regard to persons termed as enemy combatants or illegal combatants. Habeas corpus is quite relevant in the current war against terror since it provides a basis for the denial of persons involved in terrorist activities or those facilitating such activities, especially on American soil (Wert,…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Habeas Corpus Limitations

    • 1701 Words
    • 7 Pages

    judicial system. Put simply if someone is imprisoned, they have a right to plead their case before a judge that they have been wrongfully imprisoned by our laws. Many of the American Colonies had a similar form of Habeas Corpus written into their statutes prior to the Constitution so the concept was not completely foreign. The delegates at the Constitutional Convention discussed the need for a provision that assured the availability of Habeas Corpus to all citizens and after much debate, they settled on a provision which prohibited the suspension towards detainees held in federal prison. The assumed intent of the framers of the Constitution was to prevent Congress from suspending the writ of Habeas Corpus as was done by the British Parliament which allowed the colonist to be imprisoned without the legal ability to challenge the charges. After the Civil war, The Congressional Committee on Reconstruction feared that Negros would be the target of many false imprisonments and be held in state prisons which would negate any powers the Federal courts would have to extend the Writ of Habeas Corpus. In order to prevent the southern states from abusing the judicial system by imprisoning the newly freed slaves they added a provision to the Reconstruction Act that allowed the…

    • 1701 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays