Christ Of The Gospel Comparison Essay

A Compare and Contrast of the Christ of the Gospels with the Christ of Contemporary Times The Christ of the Gospels has developed into a different image in contemporary society over time. Feminists are among the most prominent group of the contemporaries that views problems with the Christ of the Gospel and has since created their own image of who Jesus Christ is and why He existed. The primary issues with the Christ of the Gospels identified are; the language represented in traditional Christology is difficult to understand and hard to translate into today’s society, the relationship of Christ’s physical being “ontology” and discipleship (Jones), the historical premise behind Christ, the varying views of atonement and the theory of Christus Victor. The Christ of the Gospels is viewed as a model of which humans should wish to emulate (Jones). However, the contemporary critics view this Christ as a suggestion that to be Christ-like, one must become a victim. Language is the cornerstone of comprehension and communication. The language and interpretation used in the Gospels is thought by
However, it is impossible for those disconnected from God to honor Him so God became human. He became human out of his need for fellowship as well. Jesus is fulfills the gap between right and wrong (Jones). The Moral exemplar theory indicates that Jesus’s suffering and resurrection would allow humans to view this as the “perfect love” from God and lead humans to want to be more like Christ (Jones). It also implies the thought of making decisions as Jesus would make them…later developed into “What Would Jesus Do?” Lastly, the Christus Victor theory is an expression of the conflict between God and Satan. Ultimately, God will always when the battle although Jesus is temporarily defeated through the events of the cross, yet is later victorious in his resurrection