Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

In the Wake of Vaccines by Barbara Loe Fisher

Good Essays
795 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
In the Wake of Vaccines by Barbara Loe Fisher
Childhood Vaccinations
According to Barbara Loe Fisher, since 1990, around fourteen thousand reports of hospitalizations, injuries, and deaths following vaccination are made to the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting Systems (VAERS), but, it is estimated that the actual number of vaccine-related health problems occurring in the U.S. every year can be more than one million. (“Parents Should Be Allowed to Opt Out of Vaccinating Their Children”, 536.) Barbara Loe Fisher and Steven P. Shelov both wrote articles about the effects of immunizations on children and the community, taking opposite sides on the argument. Fisher argues against indiscriminate mass vaccinations, and parents should have the right to decide whether or not they want to vaccinate their children. However, Shelov believes that allowing parents to opt out of vaccinating their children would open the door to epidemics of several deadly childhood diseases such as polio, measles, mumps, rubella, and diphtheria. The biggest concern in the past decade is that whether or not vaccines in general are safe. Vaccines have been shown to cause lasting damage to children. For instance, Fisher argues that vaccinations can cause mental retardation, epilepsy, learning disorders, diabetes, autism and asthma in children. Vaccinations have gotten rid of polio, but have doubled cases of attention-deficit disorder. Fisher also states that parents should have the right to decide which vaccination their children receive. She said that the government sees the children as sacrifices to learn the effect out of vaccination. She argues that parents are the one that have to deal with the burden of what happens to the child and not the government. On the other hand, Shelov believes that vaccinations are safe and necessary. He said if you don’t vaccinate a child, it would increase the risk of catching dangerous diseases. Shelov also said there is no evidence linking vaccine to autism, SIDS, or asthma. He said that vaccinations are the safest type of medication ever developed. He states children should be immunized in order to prevent exposure to the hazards of infectious diseases. He argues that without immunization, the children of the United States would be expose to deadly diseases that occur throughout the world. Given the effects of vaccines, it is understandable why so many parents may still vacillate as to whether or not to get their children vaccinated. My own belief is that parents should be able to choose whether or not to get their children immunized. I agree with Shelov that immunizations are necessary to stop diseases, but, I still believe parents should have the right to decide what is best for their children. For example, infants should not be required to get an immunization if they are at risk of catching the disease. Fisher states that children are required to get thirty-three doses of ten different immunizations before they turn five, including diseases most children are not at risk for such as hepatitis B, and drug companies are even developing vaccinations for gonorrhea and herpes, and making exposing children to these diseases a requirement is excessive and unsafe. In addition, Fisher states that some children are forced to re-immunize even after suffering adverse effects from their first immunization of the vaccine, or they will not be allowed to enroll in school. Furthermore, the state can use electronic vaccine-tracking system to tag and track children without their parents’ permission. Fisher asks, in her conclusion, if the state can tag and track people down, what freedoms will the government take next. Although some might object that allowing parents to choose whether or not their children have to receive certain immunizations might put the children in danger, I reply that the government should not have the power to intrude into peoples lives and force them to inject something into their children’s bodies that they do not want there. Another argument is that vaccines are safe, and while it is true that most vaccines are safe, when there is a bad effect from a vaccination they are sometimes very severe, and have lasting effects on people. Also, the government may say that immunizing children is a public health issue and affects the public, but they do not have to personally deal with or grieve over the reactions that affect the children. This issue is important because it can affect anyone anywhere. All of America’s children are required to get immunized, and it is not known what causes adverse reactions to most vaccines. A child can go from perfectly healthy to sick in a blink of an eye after an adverse effect from an immunization. Parents should be able to decide whether or not to put their child at risk of both the adverse reactions to the immunizations and the diseases that they are designed to protect against.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The article by Kate Thayer, is an obvious push to persuade the idea of child vaccinations and the role that parents and doctors play in them. It follows the story of a family, who was against the idea of getting vaccinated until they developed the rotavirus and their school system started kicking out unvaccinated children. The mother states that doctors were not doing their role to inform parents and reduce their fears on vaccinations. Many health facilities have even started turning away patients who refuse to vaccinate, which is a divided issue. On one side, people say that turning away patients is okay because they are protecting their other patients. However, doctors have a better chance of convincing parents to vaccinate if they keep the…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Throughout the United States, infant vaccination continues to be a highly controversial and pressured decision that parents must face upon their child’s birth. In order to maintain complete objectivity, multiple viewpoints must be critically analyzed and explored in an unbiased manner; therefore, I will examine the positives and negatives regarding adolescent vaccinations, provide general viewpoints and solutions to the debate about which infants should receive vaccinations, and supply the data required to support the arguments relevant to each side. The first viewpoint suggests that infant vaccinations should be heavily regulated due to alleged medical ramifications and adverse side effects. Many Americans support this ideology, including parents and various physicians who firmly believe that infant vaccinations induce medical complications instead of preventing them. The second viewpoint is known as selective vaccination, which is a supported by most American parents and various doctors, who affirm that parents deserve the right of authority over their child because the child’s best interest trumps obligatory immunization. The third viewpoint suggests that some U.S. parents and medical professionals advocate mandatory vaccination in order to protect infants from illnesses; thus, ultimately striving for widespread public health.…

    • 2276 Words
    • 66 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did you know that some childhood diseases, such as polio, whooping cough, and especially the measles, have nearly been eliminated in the United States due to the implementation of vaccination (“Lode Tot, Other Cases Prompt Call for Vaccinations” 1)? Unfortunately, these diseases and others like them are now making a comeback thanks to parents who are reluctant to have their children vaccinated. I believe children should be vaccinated because vaccination protects them against sickness, reduces the spread of common ailments, and can protect individuals who cannot be vaccinated.…

    • 546 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This article discusses the controversy of vaccines in American society. From the source of the ideas that caused the issues to the discredit of the person who “poisoned the well”, this article was very thorough. Ms. Lemmons has experience as a freelance writer on well documented topics and has provided her work to several well known publishers. This article was intended for the educated person exploring the rumors of vaccinations benefit being outweighed by the risk. The author is very neutral in her writing. I appreciate her stance and use of fact to support her claims. Stating only the fact that can be documented…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Because not all individuals are able to receive vaccinations due to medical reasons, vaccination programs are extremely important. It is also important to remember that some people who have been vaccinated will not fully respond. Some may believe that a few non-vaccinating parents will have no appreciable impact on outbreak likelihood or management and for this reason, a bioethical issue is created. Other reasons parents refuse vaccines include religious reasons, skepticism about science, the side effects the vaccination may contain, personal beliefs, and that parents believe vaccinations are unnecessary (Anderson 2015). Ethical considerations include whether the parents of these children bear a responsibility to consider that their immunization…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of the controversial/hot topics or issues nowadays in health care in the US and the world as a whole is vaccination. The main purpose of vaccines is to control and prevent communicable diseases. The target is to vaccinate about 99 percent of the population. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), “about 1.5 million children under age 5 years continue to die annually from diseases that are preventable via the administration of vaccines, making up approximately 20 percent of overall childhood mortality” (Maternal and Child Health, n.d). The WHO continues to argue with evidence that vaccination can prevent death from pneumonia and diarrhea which are the leading cost of death among children under five years old. Although vaccination…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Almost everyone has heard of the issue between the benefits and dangers of childhood vaccines. As a parent you want to do what is best for your child and protect them. Some people have different opinions on what that specifically entails when it comes to childhood vaccines. Vaccinations are a controversial topic that many people talk about, whether it should be mandatory or optional is mainly questioned by parents who feel that the Cons outweigh the Pros. The government says that it is the right thing to do in order for you and your family to be safe from illnesses and diseases. But there have also been some opposed opinions about whether or not it’s worth the risk of being sick once getting vaccinated and if it actually works. The argument on both sides range from first amendment right issues all the way to disabling health concerns. In this essay I plan to enlighten and elaborate on both the positive and negative outlook on vaccinations in infants and children and why parents are so hesitant in vaccinating their children.…

    • 1723 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People are current taking action against vaccinations and joining the anti-vaccination movement. Although research proves anti-immunization increases disease rates, parents stand firm in their believe that their children should not be vaccinated. This paper briefly discusses the reasoning behind their notion and the substantial fact about vaccinations. It then provides facts behind their judgment and consequences of…

    • 58 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Certain things that we encounter in life, have hidden dangers, while others only look scary at first glance and turn out to be quite positive. It is because of these types of things that many people become confused when it comes to making life altering decisions, such as being vaccinated. While many think of vaccines as harmful and dangerous, they are in fact safe and essential for stopping the spread of life threatening diseases, and therefore should be mandatory.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2010 PBS aired a one hour Frontline documentary about the vaccine war in the United States. This documentary pitted scientists and parents against each other, scientist’s back up their claims with scientific evidence while the parent’s arguments are solely based on opinion. The parents introduced throughout the film who were against vaccines made claims that the vaccines given to children in today’s world are the cause of many issues, like the rise in autism, ADHD, and learning disabilities. These parents also feel there is no need to vaccinate because the diseases that their children are being vaccinated for are no longer an issue in the united states. While the scientists stress the importance of vaccines because they have decreased the issues of these diseases that cause so many problems when infected. A lot of these scientists are older and were children when these diseases had outbreaks and may have even gotten the disease themselves. In the films conclusion Arthur Caplan is quoted saying “Do good in the name of children. Do good in the name of public health”. This quote leaves the viewers with the decision on who to side with. I feel like the documentary was in favor of the scientists and were in support of vaccinating children.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Vaccines teach the immune system by mimicking a natural infection. Vaccination has a long history, from the early harassment of smallpox, to the establishment of vaccination mandates, to the effects of war and social unrest on vaccine-preventable diseases. Vaccination has saved millions of lives and protected generations since the early Chinese were vaccinated in the 11th century. As technology evolves and vaccine delivery changes by time, vaccination will play an important role to protect the future generation. Although someone might argue that they have freedom to accept the vaccination or to not accept, vaccination is essential and necessary for children’s safety in the future’s society, and children should be required to be vaccinated in the future.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The general public needs to be aware of radical political ideologies that oppose vaccinations without clinical studies or proof of the dangers of vaccination. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services wants to inform you of the clinical trails and the content of vaccines, which will dispel any subjective arguments against the vaccination process. The citizen must be aware of the dangers of subjective or misinformed political ideology that strays from scientific fact and clinical studies that are available to the general public in reference to vaccination.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fight against vaccines has become controversial however arguments against mass immunization should be evaluated so that a good understanding of this controversy can be had. There are three main arguments against the mass immunization of children and babies. Firstly, It is argued that vaccinations can have harmful side effects on children. Secondly, it is argued that laws requiring mandatory vaccinations infringe upon an individual’s liberty and freedom of choice; and finally, mass immunizations a law, violates religious freedom. According to Omer et al (2009) approximately 69% of parents are more concerned that vaccines could cause harm to the health of their young children than they are with the other issues. The CDC does, in fact, publish that vaccines may have side effects for example a reaction to the varicella vaccine can range from a rash to a severe infection (CDC, 2010). No specific evidence exist, however, to support the claim that vaccines predispose children to other disease such as type 1…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The modern medicine really made a significant contribution to our society. Vaccines can prevent a disease from occurring in the first place, rather than attempt to cure it after the fact. The invention of the vaccines prevents people from being infected. There are three benefits of vaccines, prevent the diseases in the childhood, protect the community and much cheaper than getting the treatment.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Vaccines Research Paper

    • 2470 Words
    • 10 Pages

    There are many arguments against vaccinating, but three of the main causes for not vaccinating a child are religious beliefs, the fear of autism, and the side effects vaccines can cause; however, the effects are horrendous, the loss of herd immunity, risk of outbreaks, cost to the patient’s family and taxpayers to fight a preventable disease, and tragic unnecessary death. There have been many cases of babies who have gotten whooping cough, rubella, and other diseases, which they caught from another child at daycare, because the child’s parents did not vaccinate them. Many babies have died from this because they were too young to receive the vaccination. Lack of vaccination can have very deadly consequences. There are several solutions to helping parents get their kids vaccinated. These solutions are making all vaccines mandatory, educating parents on vaccines, help parents, doctors, and schools, keep an accurate recording of vaccination…

    • 2470 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays